similar to: FreeBSD kerberos for AD integration: MIT or Heimdal?

Hi, I am trying to get samba 3.0.7 working with our win2k DC. I installed samba from the ports collection, so the kerberos library looks to be the heimdel version. I can use kinit to create a ticket and it authenticates against the DC just fine. However when I attempt to use "net ads join" it fails with the following response: [2004/11/09 16:32:30, 0] utils/net_ads.c:ads_startup(183)

I am attempting to setup Samba 3.0.10 on a Windows 2000 Active Directory domain. The problem I'm having is getting Samba to configure correctly to get the Kerberos library. I've gone through previous posts and have tried doing what others suggested but I still keep getting the error of: "configure: error: libkrb5 is needed for Active Directory support" The current configure

Yes, until now it works well : I had written a mistake in the smb.conf ! Sorry Thanks a lot -----Message d'origine----- De : samba-bounces+albert.hervo=sydel.fr@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces+albert.hervo=sydel.fr@lists.samba.org]De la part de Albert HERVO Envoy? : vendredi 5 novembre 2004 13:25 ? : Samba Objet : TR: [Samba] Configuration with Windows clients It doesn't

All, First off I would like to say the book "The Official Samba-3 HowTO and Reference Guide" is awesome I purchased it off Amazon a couple of weeks ago. Ok now on to my problem. I have samba installed and configured and joined the domain no problem. When I run wbinfo -u I can see my domain users, when I run wbinfo -g I can see all my domain groups, BUT if I run

Hey this group uses exchange for the mailing list? This can't be true what is with all the virus warnings saying it came from exchange. But not only that it said it was deleted and that is not true when the mail reached me it still had the virus attached and my virus scanner deleted it. When these messages are sent to the group aren't they scanned before being sent to the list? Just

FreeBSD 4.10 Latest version of Samba Domain Member WinXP machines with SP2 Why do these errors continue to come up, it does not seem to be hurting a thing as the box is working perfectly no complaints other than these errors in my log file. Oct 14 16:07:00 ns1 smbd[82463]: getpeername failed. Error was Socket is not connected Oct 14 16:07:00 ns1 smbd[82463]: [2004/10/14 16:07:00, 0]

The owner of a folder (userid gdunn01) is unable to make any changes to it (rename / delete) through Samba despite being listed as having read/write perms. I'm using winbind for username mapping. I feel like I'm missing something simple. ma21cab5# wbinfo -t checking the trust secret via RPC calls succeeded ma21cab5# ls -ld asdfas/ drwxr-xr-x 2 gdunn01 Domain Users 512 Jun 22 08:50

Hi, I'm running OpenSSH 3.8 & 3.9, compiled against Heimdal 0.6.3 for it's GSSAPI & AFS integration. A couple weeks ago, we upgraded our MIT KDC from (ugh) Kerberos 5 1.0.6 to the lastest and greatest 1.3.5. However, it seems that as part of the upgrade, our GSSAPI credentials passing in OpenSSH stopped working. Actually, didn't completely stop... You can still do a

Dear All, Would like some know the answer on the above question. What is the different between compiling using internal heimdal library vs mit-krb5. I'm on gentoo and thus like other distro having issue on the system-wide mit-krb and removing it is not that convenient (But still possible) I've try to compile samba 4.1.2 with internal heimdal library to work as a Domain controller But

On Mon, 2023-03-20 at 10:39 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > Indeed. For the record, current set of tests not supported by > > --with-system-mitkrb5 build: > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > $ cat selftest/skip_mit_kdc > > # We do not support RODC yet > > .*rodc > > .*RODC > > ^samba4.ntvfs.cifs.ntlm.base.unlink >

I have been pulling my hairs out about this for a while now. Running the latest version of SuSE with all patches applied, I have my machine joined to the domain no problem. But when I go to use mount -t smbfs I get this error. Mounting share failed, smbmnt must be installed suid root for direct user mounts (1000,1000) smbmnt failed:1 Of course I hit Google and the list archives first before

I have a freshly installed FreeBSD 6.0-BETA1 system, which comes with Heimdal & OpenSSH w/GSSAPI enabled (version 4.1p1 FreeBSD-20050605) Most of the servers I connect to have OpenSSH w/GSSAPI enabled but they use MIT Kerberos (1,3.x and 1.4.x) Now, I can use ticket authentication between all systems where the libraries are all the same (Heimdal or MIT), but trying to use, for example,

My college is kerberized, and so in many situations authentication is both faster and more secure using kerberos tickets. Sadly I have run into a problem. The Heimdal included in FreeBSD seems to be incompatible with my school's servers running MIT kerberos when authenticating over gssapi. For example ssh in verbose mode returns: debug2: we sent a gssapi-with-mic packet, wait for reply

What is the difference between Heimdal and MIT as far usability goes? MIT seems to be the default on major linux distrobutions, but I here a lot about people preferring Heimdal, but I can't find any reasons why. Is one generally more stable/faster/reliable than the other? There is already a blank wiki page at http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_%26_Kerberos so if anyone has any good

I have some problem whit Kerberos. OS: FreeBSD 5.3 Domain: W2k3 native mode. 1)I am Installing Heimdal 0.6.1 over port. Config /etc/krb5.conf %/usr/local/bin/kinit ivan ivan@NKMK.RU's Password: kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP 2)Compile and install Heimdal 0.6.4 over source %/usr/local/bin/kinit ivan ivan@NKMK.RU's Password: kinit:

On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 09:29 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy via samba- technical wrote: > Hi, > > > I would be against a blended build against both MIT Kerberos and > Heimdal > Kerberos in a distribution. It is not going to bring you anything > good, > support wise. > > Andreas and I have submitted a talk to SambaXP about MIT > Kerberos/Heimdal Kerberos-based Samba AD

Hi! I already asked a similar question before, but it keeps popping up in different contexts and forms, and the more I use samba myself, the more often it comes to me too, especially in context of using various security tokens for auth. And the more I think about all this, the more sane it looks to me. The thing is: mit-krb5 has much better user-level support than heimdal. But samba does not

While I haven't gotten to the part that necessarily pertains to samba, I figured people on here may have tried to set this up before I'm trying to connect my freebsd 5.x server to a windows 2003 server. I have been using this tutorial http://oslabs.mikro-net.com/fbsd_samba.html I've gotten down to the part where I run ldapsearch using SSL/TLS and I get this minubian# ldapsearch

Thank you for your help! I gave you an example, you could run it in R . Maybe you will understand my meaning clearly. x <- data.frame(main.name="AAA", x.name=rep(c("Apply","Watermelon","Lemon","Banana",

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635 ------- Additional Comments From mmokrejs at natur.cuni.cz 2003-10-17 21:13 ------- Please commit the patch http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=396&action=view and close this bug. KRB5 does not work, but I don't care anymore as there's krb4 patch from ftp://ftp.mcc.ac.uk/pub/misc/ssh/ . :) Thanks! ------- You are