similar to: Strange WINS entries with samba 3.07 running as PDC

hi, Postmaster wrote: > Hello, > > hope one can give me a hint. > > I am trying to setup secured connections for > wavelan clients with no success. > > On the windows side, the eventviewer is saying: > Bogus data reveived from 010010050001. ups, my falt. i broke one priv key. Now the connection is working. I still can not route default taffic through tincd. The

Hi, I am having an issue browsing my work group, i have made the samba server the master browser and it wins the elections. As far as i can tell from the nmbd.logs it is also collecting hosts for the workgroup but when you try to list the workgroup this error is recorded in the messages log : nss_wins[7417]: [2004/09/14 09:54:23, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(570) nss_wins[7417]:

Hi everyone, I want to convert some 50 new machines that an organization is getting into Fedora Linux workstations. This is the current setup: The organization currently has one Primary Windows 2000 ADS and 2 numbers of Windows 2000 servers acting as Backup domain servers. There are currently some 50 workstations already in the network and these are all Windows 2000 professional machines.

Hi Henrik, You don't have the latest C/C++ Front End Source code. Please update from CVS to get the fix for the 2005-06-15-ExpandGotoInternalProblem.c test. Note the date of the test (5 days ago). Reid. On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 18:42 +0200, Henrik Bach wrote: > Hi, > > Now, I've build the tools and the cfe. However, 'make check' gave me the > attached results.

Hi, Just got Fedora FC1 vanilla 2.4.25kernel+libata8patch booting problems, FC1 complains that it can not automatically find&found partitions specified with "LABEL=" in /etc/fstab, and then falls me into repair mode. In the repair mode I can mount it manually without any problems. More interesting are: 1) I have several partitions specified with "LABEL=*" in

Moved samba (acting as a standalone system) from a RH9 system to a FC1 system. It wont authenticate the users. Here is more of the specifics: 1. Users log into a Samba PDC. 2. Login scripts setup their mappings 3. Some mappings are on the PDC (these still work) 4. Some mappings are on the standalone server. 5. The version of samba on RH9 is 2.2.7 6. The version of samba on FC1 is 3.0.4 I

Hi, Now, I've build the tools and the cfe. However, 'make check' gave me the attached results. Summarized as follows: # of expected passes 1081 # of unexpected failures 26 # of expected failures 32 I configured llvm with following options: '--prefix=/home/hb/llvm/ --enable-targets=host-only'. I used gcc version 3.4.2 to build the tools and cfe. The cfe is version:

Hi Reid, Now, I've removed the file and updated the source tree with this command: cvs -z3 -d :pserver:anon at llvm-cvs.cs.uiuc.edu:/var/cvs/llvm update -PdR llvm However, the file still exits. Henrik. >From: Reid Spencer >Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 10:57:54 -0700 > >Hi Henrik, > >You don't have the latest C/C++ Front End Source code. Please update >from CVS to get

I'm trying to do some quick backups from a Win2K laptop to a Fedora Core 1 desktop but it ain't working. The backups are just a bunch of xcopy's. Most of them run fine but two fail and I don't understand why. It appears that xcopy is attempting to create directories in both cases. When I run the backup targeting a Win98 desktop there is no problem. Here are two examples of

Hi all, I couldn't access win2k3 server shares from my FC2 box. It's got default Fedora Core 2 installation. Kernel: 2.6.5-1.358 Samba: samba-3.0.3-5 I've tried with both smbfs and cifs options. This is what happens, With smbfs: $ mount -t smbfs -o username=admin //ServerIP/sharename /mnt/sharename password: $ $ ls /mnt/sharename ls: /mnt/sharename: Permission denied $ $ ls -l

Hi group, I am a newbie to Taffic contol. I came across many new terms and technical documantation and technology along with this new intrest of mine. After 2 weeks i am unable to find a good starting point. there are cbq, HTB, classifies MARK and all sorts of things The apge at by MAB given me a introduction to all sorts of Terms. I am now reading LARTC How to as any Linux traffic doc. points

On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Ron Shannon wrote: > All points agreed. > > As you suggest, the docs are better if they''re a well-integrated set. If > a choice is made to exclude an advanced subject or level of detail from > the QSG, they should be covered elsewhere. As noted before, the docs as > a whole are exceptionally good. Your extra effort on the docs certainly > shows

Hi everybody. I know that we can normally install source rpms designed for RH9 and FC1, but can we also install the binary RPMs for RH9 and/or FC1 on a CentOS 3 system ?

Where I work, we have an application that has been merrily running away (and being built) on FC1 (yes, you read that right). One of my assignments is to bring this up to CentOS, but on my first effort, I ran into this interesting "feature." The original build process (FC1) uses mkdep to generate the dependency files that are subsequently used by the makes to build the app. mkdep does

Recently, I had some experiences that raises the question as to how compatible (how safe) it is to mount and then read/write a partition using a system such as FC1 or debian where the partition was created under FC3. 1. I recently attempted to run e2fsck running on a FC1 system against a FC3 ext3 partition ... the program refused to run. When I took the e2fsprogs package from FC3 and

mkumar@mantragroup.com wrote: > Hi All, > > I am a newbie and trying to install Asterisk from instructions given > in http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+RPM. We have > Centos 3.3 so > I downloaded rpm's from > ftp://ftp.linuxsys.com/pub/LSE/packages/CentOS-3.4/asterisk-1.0.9/ and > tried installing one by one but I get the following errors

Yes it is all the reason why we want to change to Centos (longer EOL), and we think the stability in RHE should be worth something. It's not always the best to run the newest and the best especially on a production server. So is there anyway to do it other than from yum or to manually force install all the rpm downloaded in the cache? Thanks. regards -----Original Message----- From:

Another little problem I am now having on CentOS 5.2 that I was not seeing on FC8: [mrichter at sushi lane]$ cvs update poll: protocol failure in circuit setup cvs [update aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) I could understand if there was something that had changed from FC1 to CentOS 5.2, but if it works in FC8, why not here? Here's what's in the CVS

Hi, I am having an issue browsing my work group, i have made the samba server the master browser and it wins the elections. As far as i can tell from the nmbd.logs it is also collecting hosts for the workgroup but when you try to list the workgroup this error is recorded in the messages log : nss_wins[7417]: [2004/09/14 09:54:23, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(570) nss_wins[7417]:

Hi stef and all I want measure the policy perfomance for video traffic on mpls diffserv network. there are two different polices for video packet 1. Video packets that are marked that are over the limit are to be rejected at the edge router. 2. Video packets that are marked that are over the limit are to be downgraded as best effort and are sent through. Before video enter my mpls