similar to: automatically authenticate domain logged-on users ina pache with AD/NTDOM?

Hi! I don't use MS products at all, so I have very little knowledge with them, but I believe Microsoft has as protocol where Internet Explorer can automatically authenticate against an IIS server, and given that the server and client are on the same NT domain, and the client user is logged in to that domain, the user is automatically logged in without the need to give away the password

Hello! I have a problem with samba. I run the freebsd samba-des port (samba-des-1.9.17.4) in a pretty much vanilla setting; home dir, a few shared dirs, no printing (yet). The problem is performance. While Samba is not terribly slow it's still too slow. Copying large files takes about half a minute/meg on an Ethernet LAN with no other activity. Trying to read a file using netscape

On Thu, 5 Jun 2003, Shaun Jurrens wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 06:32:46PM +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > #> Hi Shaun, > #> > #> Thanks for the input! Glad to hear I'm not the only one > #> > #> In my case, both the SCSI and NIC are integrated on the motherboard, so I > #> cannot really move them around... :) > #> > #> Also, as I

Hi! Even with 2.0.4, I'm still seeing a lot of oplock break failures (clients failing, see log further down). The client hangs for approx 30 secs (sometimes more) and then gets back online. At least one user can't use the file shares at all; it hangs whatever he does, and on any computer he uses (NT or 98, laptop, desktop...) Other users have less problems, but maybe they are less

On Thu, 2020-02-06 at 16:21 +0200, Palle Kuling via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I did a git bisect between 4.10.0rc1 and 4.11.0. The result is as > follows: > b6b5b5fe355fee2a4096e9214831cb88c7a2a4c6 is the first bad commit > Date: Wed Mar 6 15:28:45 2019 +1300 > > lib ldb key value: fix index buffering > > Is there anything else I should check? Thanks, that

Hi! updated to p4 the other day, and now the "character set = iso8859-1" option doesn't work anymore. I didn't change anything in the smb.conf file but this: unix password sync = True time server = yes and it worked in 1.9.18p3 :/ Has anyone else seen this? Samba runs on FreeBSD 2.2.6 from the ports collection. (I don't think that password sync works for this

On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 18:17 +0200, Palle Kuling via samba wrote: > Hello, > > I did some detective work here, stepping through all the versions > from > the old 4.9.4 database onwards, building them from source on an > isolated > system and doing ldapsearch against them. It is the change from > 4.10.13 > to 4.11.0 (or maybe in general from pre-4.11 to 4.11?) that

siamo a venerd?, anche questa settimana ? passata e devo ammettere che questo pensiero mi fa stare molto bene visto che da oggi fino a luned? passer? sicuramente dei giorni stupendi e lascier? dietro quelli appena passati che devo essere sincera mi hanno fatto girare parecchio le palle..tra lavoro e universit? poche notizie buone purtroppo....quello che mi salva sempre ? che porto una gran luce

On 01/02/2020 09:54, Palle Kuling via samba wrote: > Hello, > > Ldbsearch returns the correct result. However this particular query is > performed by an external system (that does not have access to the LDB > files), to check whether a certain user belongs to a specific OU or > not. The query is performed over LDAP against Samba, so it is not a > ldapsearch-only problem. I

Hi! My suggestion: Use Amanda (www.amanda.org, cd /usr/ports/misc/amanda24 && make install with FreeBSD). It has support for smbtar. Haven't tried it myself, but I hear it's working fine. (I think I have seen a patch for gnu tar, that fixes the path length limit. I'm sure, though...) /Palle -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr?n: Tony Jones <tony@rtd.com> Till:

Hi! I'm having problems with a newly setup samba-2.0 (migrating from 1.9.18p10, which has served us extremely well). I'm running the server as PDC. Too often, saving files (possibly other actions, I'm not sure) takes forever and finally gives a timeout. The server's child process dies signal 8 (see below). Also, the processes die (same error messages and signal 8) during the

On Sat, 2020-02-01 at 17:22 +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 01/02/2020 16:29, Palle Kuling via samba wrote: > > > > Queried against Samba 4.11.4 (query is for OU=Business but response is > > from OU=Test): > > $ldapsearch -D username at internal.xxx.yy -w password -H > > ldaps://192.168.1.1 -s one -b ou=business,dc=internal,dc=xxx,dc=yy > >

Hello all, I just tried this on our setup and it ist the same there. I get results from other OUs. Using sub instead of one I get the "right" results. Regards Christian Am 01.02.20 um 20:26 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba: > On Sat, 2020-02-01 at 17:22 +0000, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 01/02/2020 16:29, Palle Kuling via samba wrote: >>> >>>

On 01/02/2020 16:29, Palle Kuling via samba wrote: > > > Queried against Samba 4.11.4 (query is for OU=Business but response is > from OU=Test): > $ldapsearch -D username at internal.xxx.yy -w password -H > ldaps://192.168.1.1 -s one -b ou=business,dc=internal,dc=xxx,dc=yy > "(&(objectCategory=person)(objectClass=user)(sAMAccountName=testadmin))" > #

Hello, I did a git bisect between 4.10.0rc1 and 4.11.0. The result is as follows: b6b5b5fe355fee2a4096e9214831cb88c7a2a4c6 is the first bad commit Date: Wed Mar 6 15:28:45 2019 +1300 lib ldb key value: fix index buffering Is there anything else I should check? Regards, -P On 2020-02-04 00:08, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 18:17 +0200, Palle Kuling via

I hope you can help with what might be an easy query. I am doing some simple simulations where I am generating series of data from a normal distribution using rnorm. I am then treating these as a time series. I want to know how I can incorporate correlation in the series (autocorrelation) i.e. make the observations non-independent, with a known (but simple) correlation structure. In other words I

Hello, Is it not Samba that is listening to the LDAP ports and is serving me the answer to my query? This problem does not only happen when the LDAP database is searched using ldapsearch, it happens also using other tools that connect to the LDAP ports. I still don't fully grasp what this has to do with the uniqueness of the sAMAccountNames - they are unique throughout my directory and I

On Fri, 2020-01-31 at 15:50 +0200, Palle Kuling via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed the following problem with records returned outside the search > base when the query is run against a Samba DC, but when the same query > is run against a Windows 2008 or 2012 DC it does not happen. I'm pretty > sure it worked correctly in the past. I updated from Samba 4.9.4 to >

Hello, Ldbsearch returns the correct result. However this particular query is performed by an external system (that does not have access to the LDB files), to check whether a certain user belongs to a specific OU or not. The query is performed over LDAP against Samba, so it is not a ldapsearch-only problem. I only used ldapsearch to verify the behavior. Regardless of if the query is wrong or

Hi I'm becoming a bit confused. I have been trying out the Samba PDC code from BRANCH_NTDOM on Solaris 2.5.1 (with great success !). I now want to download the latest version and messages on the samba-ntdom list say to download from the main branch. What exactly do I put in my cvs command ? The NTDOM FAQ says 'cvs -d :pserver:cvs@samba.anu.edu.au:/cvsroot co samba '. When I do