Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Samba and Active Directory"
2013 May 24
0
Problem After adding Bricks
Hello, I have run into some performance issues after adding bricks to
a 3.3.1 volume. Basically I am seeing very high CPU usage and
extremely degraded performance. I started a re-balance but stopped it
after a couple days. The logs have a lot of entries for split-brain as
well as "Non Blocking entrylks failed for". For some of the
directories on the client doing an ls will show multiple
2006 Mar 08
3
how to manage 3000 Samba Connection
Hi All,
Give Me some good idea, about.. how to manage 3000 Samba Connection.
in my network i have 6 Samba File Server..
Volumes Are common in all Samba servers (GPFS Volume + 6 GPFS Nodes)
(so 6 Servers are there to share this connection. 500 X 6 )
at a time.. i am getting maximum 3000 samba connection
and almost all connection is opening 150MB to 300MB file (3D Animation
Files)
total opened
2012 Apr 17
4
Destination share larger than windows source
Hi,
I'm running Samba 3.6.3 on Ubuntu 12.04 (beta). Like many before me,
I'm trying to migrate data from a Windows file server.
I copied over a share as a test and was a bit surprised when the amount
of space allocated in the file system was over 100GB larger than the
Windows source. I am running on ext4 with "strict allocate = yes"
because I want to be sure that when I turn
2008 Jun 06
1
Asterisk not picking up incoming calls from TDM400P
Hi,
I am having some issues with a new server install in Singapore.
Outbound calls work fine.
Inbound calls are not picked up by Asterisk.
Zaptel 1.2.25 and Asterisk 1.2.28 both built from source.
libpri installed
wctdm and zaptel load without error
Jun 6 23:34:03 fs01 kernel: [211138.372933] Zapata Telephony Interface
Registered on major 196
Jun 6 23:34:03 fs01 kernel: [211138.372937]
2014 Sep 24
3
Samba not working with sssd on CentOS 6.5
Hello everyone.
I joined this list because I cannot find an answer to my problem. The
setup is this:
I installed CentOS release 6.5 (Final) minimal version
Updated all packages
Added the server to the Active Directory domain as a member server
using the method described here (using adcli, kerberos and sssd):
http://jhrozek.livejournal.com/3581.html
It worked, I tested by trying to connect through
2018 Apr 06
4
LDAP getent issues
Hi,
We are having some issues with LDAP authentication. Here is our setup
PDC and LDAP(samba classic) = dc01
SambaClassic domain = stdom
Member server = fs01
We migrated from TDB to LDAP. The old TDB users are able to login to the domain and access file shares without issues. Any new user created in LDAP is not able to access the shares. When trying to create shared drives for the new users
2008 Jul 30
1
Mounting File Share Using CIFS ?'s
I have been trying to mount a windows file share so I can use it for
remote storage particularly for my Deki Wiki attachments.
Anyway, I seem to have a mount established by doing the following.
1. Added following line to /etc/fstab
//fs01/wikidata /var/www/dekiwiki/attachments cifs
user,uid=500,rw,suid,username=wikisvcacct,password=testpwd,domain=corporate
2. Then ran following command to
2016 Nov 16
2
Multiple location DC's with same hostnames
Hi,
Not sure exactly how I would word the subject line so appologies in advanced.
We are trying to accomplish the following scenario:
Location 1:
PDC: fs01.loc1.example.com
IP: 10.0.0.1
Location 2:
SDC: fs01.loc2.example.com
IP: 10.0.1.1
Clearly when we join the SDC to the PDC there is a naming conflict. The end result would be to have clients at each site resolve the fs01 name to
2018 Apr 23
2
canonicalize_connect_path failed for service
Hi,
Our setup:
Samba (classic) DC: cdr-dc01
Samba (classic) member server: cdr-fs01. This is also a file server
AD realm: CDR.internal
We migrated to AD and came across an issue with accessing shares. The
shares in question worked pre-migrated. i.e using a windows machine a user
was able to access that share. The share in question was locked down to
just that user
Post migration, we are able
2018 Sep 25
2
Samba 4.7.9 dbcheck error
Am 25.09.2018 um 12:37 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 12:08:00 +0200
> Daniel Jordan <d.jordan at gfd.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 25.09.2018 um 11:35 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>>> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:18:03 +0200
>>> Daniel Jordan via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 24.09.2018 um 19:33
2020 Feb 24
3
Client station file permission behavior changes after a week or so
Sorry, but I didn't really know how to word this.
I have Univention Corporate server running as AD DC, with a UCS running
as a member fileserver.
One win10 client has file permission issues after lack of reboot or
logout/login
in roughly a weeks time. Symptom = can't write to shares even though
permissions
are correct. Sometimes files are created without honoring default ACL.
Could this
2018 Sep 26
2
Samba 4.7.9 dbcheck error
Am 25.09.18 um 14:26 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 13:12:18 +0200
> Daniel Jordan <d.jordan at gfd.de> wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> dc01:~# samba-tool dbcheck --cross-ncs
>>>>>>>> Checking 4503 objects
>>>>>>>> SID S-1-5-21-3258148492-1502286889-3538134041-1601 for
>>>>>>>>
2014 Jul 24
2
Samba 4 AD share: Access denied
I have been using Samba4 for ages and love it as a DC and a
print-server. I just setup my first member-server designed solely to
host file shares, and have hit an issue. Group policy is mapping it
correctly for the users in the group, but those users are getting an
access denied message from their Windows 7 Pro 64bit clients when
accessing the share. I have configured ACLs and the box
2020 Sep 06
2
Make new server the "master"
Thank you everyone for your help. I corrected my resolv.conf files as Peter
Milesson suggested and then had to take a number of extra steps so now
things are looking a little better. In case it helps anyone else in the
future, here's what I found (plus I am now having problems resolving
internal addresses).
As far as I can see, the setup on both servers is identical (except they
use their own
2006 Aug 30
1
Domain SID does not match built in domain groups' SIDs...
Hello,
I'm having a few problems, but I'm thinking this should be fixed first.
It may solve my other issues.
It appears that the built in domain groups' SIDs do not match the
domain's SID. I used the IDEALX scripts to create these accounts and I
obviously thought everything was fine before proceeding to add users and
groups.
Any suggestions on how I can correct this without
2018 Sep 25
2
Samba 4.7.9 dbcheck error
Am 25.09.2018 um 11:35 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 11:18:03 +0200
> Daniel Jordan via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 24.09.2018 um 19:33 schrieb Andrew Bartlett via samba:
>>> On Mon, 2018-09-24 at 13:51 +0200, Daniel Jordan via samba wrote:
>>>> Hello list,
>>>>
>>>> I'm
2018 Apr 12
3
Issues post AD migration
Hi ,
We ran the classic upgrade and migrated the domain . We were then able to add a Windows Server 2008R2 and dcpromo it.
Here are some of the issues we are seeing post migration
- Pre the migration, the password backend was LDAP. We had some groups that we had migrated into LDAP from TBD. These groups doesn't seem to have come up in AD.
- Any groups that were created in
2012 Jan 16
6
Prevent smbd from consulting winbindd
Colleagues,
I am running smbd in a setup described in
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/idmapper.html#id2604553
under "Winbind is not used; users and groups are local". Samba is
running in the security=domain mode, but all Windows users are being
mapped to Unix users in /etc/passwd.
Now I need to run winbindd for Squid authentication. The problem is,
as soon as
2018 Apr 23
2
canonicalize_connect_path failed for service
Hi Rowland,
We did the classicupgrade. Post the classicupgrade, we added a Windows
2008R2 server and dcpomo'd it. The original Samba box (classic DC) was
where we did the classicupgrade. Did you mean that we need to shut that
box down? Leaving a Windows DC (FSMO?) and Samba member server? Sorry I
was not aware of this step. What if we hadn't added a Windows 08 box?
Here is the
2008 Nov 22
4
Mount point problem
I just had to deal with a situation where a glusterfs filesystem would
not mount because someone had managed to create some files and
directories under the mount point. Perhaps this behavior is
intentional, but I would prefer that it work like NFS and just
overmount. When bringing a cluster down and back up, it is quite
possible for overeager users to log in and start working before