similar to: Winbind success BUT blank root password

On Thu, April 13, 2017 1:38 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like eclipse, that needs 2GB to run... for an editor. >>>> mark "my

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:29:29PM +0200, Martin Kletzander wrote: >On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:55:45PM -0400, TomK wrote: >>On 4/12/2016 3:40 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >>> [ I would be way easier to reply if you didn't top-post ] >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:07:50PM -0400, TomK wrote: >>>> On 4/12/2016 11:45 AM, John Ferlan wrote:

On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 03:55:45PM -0400, TomK wrote: >On 4/12/2016 3:40 PM, Martin Kletzander wrote: >> [ I would be way easier to reply if you didn't top-post ] >> >> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 12:07:50PM -0400, TomK wrote: >>> On 4/12/2016 11:45 AM, John Ferlan wrote: >>>> What got my attention was the error message "initializing FS storage

On 10/1/18 8:40 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:28:29 +0200 > Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi Louis and Rowland, >> >> I'm just reporting back on this, in case it may help somebody else. >> >> Getting a working getent (or id) under the current version of CentOS >> with winbind just

> x86 will be worse than PPC, too: the special case needed to support > QEMU 2.2 with IOMMU and virtio enabled with a Xen guest will be fairly > large and disgusting and will only exist to support something that IMO > should never have existed in the first place. <scratches his head> I don't follow. > > PPC at least avoids *that* problem by virtue of not having Xen

I guess I'm sort of surprised and I expected better performance I have a new server set up with RAID 10 drives (6) Repeated a number of times and though I am clumsy with stop watch timing, these numbers appear to be close enough for government work... Server, CentOS 5.2 and updated earlier today, just installed a week ago. Client, Macintosh G4, OS X 10.4.11 NFS Mount is done with the

. > > Sorry if I offended you, but Volker was telling you what you needed to > do. You were coming over as if you didn't want to do what you were > being advised to do. No, that is just not the case. I just wanted to be sure of the implications of what I was doing and what areas of the operation of Samba and CTDB might be affected given the confusing results of my ping_pong tests.

Dear all, I try to use read.table to get the data from a tab delimited file, and some of the data is shown below: 3185 heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein F 3187 heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H1 (H) 3188 heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H2 (H') 3189 heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H3 (2H9) 3190 heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein K ///

On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:28:29 +0200 Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Louis and Rowland, > > I'm just reporting back on this, in case it may help somebody else. > > Getting a working getent (or id) under the current version of CentOS > with winbind just doesn't seems possible. I haven't got a clue where > the problem is. I have

Dear all I'm not too sure where to start here - possibly a feature request. I am getting great results with using Winbind to manage Kerberos tickets for Linux workstations "joined" to an AD. Fixed machines work beautifully - I have Raspberry Pis and PCs (running Arch and Gentoo) and servers running Ubuntu LTS , all doing Kerberos against AD KDCs with local logins via AD and local

Hi, all! I've a huge problem on my home network and I suspect it is samba to blame: Machine A: Fileserver running on FreeBSD 4.5 + Samba 2.2.4 Has 2 discs: 1 UFS partition and other is 80GB FAT32 partition Machine B: Win2K Pro, with maped discs to shares both to \\A\UFS and \\A\FAT32 Whenever I write files B -> A using samba, the files are beeing corrupted, but only on the shared FAT32

Hello, I'm doing a research on the impulse responses in VAR models and I'm having troubles in interpretation of R results. My question is what is the shock of impulse variable that is produced to obtain the response? Is it one-standard-deviation positive shock? If it is so how can I obtain the responses on other types of shocks, say, 10% negative shock? Thanks a lot, Marion

I have been trying for the past couple of week to get copernic agent professional and system shock 2 to run successfully under wine. But with no success. Every time I install copernic agent and it almost finish installing I get an error message unable to initialize folder. Now as for system shock I just will not start and I have tried reinstalling system shock 2 but that did not help at all. It

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > I thought hard about this, I think we are better off waiting till the > next release: there's a chance QEMU will have IOMMU support for KVM x86 > then, and this will make it easier to judge which way does the wind > blow. > > It seems that we lose nothing substantial keeping the status quo

On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > I thought hard about this, I think we are better off waiting till the > next release: there's a chance QEMU will have IOMMU support for KVM x86 > then, and this will make it easier to judge which way does the wind > blow. > > It seems that we lose nothing substantial keeping the status quo

Dear all: Greetings! I am trying to replicate a simple state space model in R, using the package 'dlm'. This model has two observation equations and three state equations. Each observation equation represents structural shocks based on SVAR for country i, where i=1 to 2. The structural shocks (S1 and S2) are to be decomposed into common (sv1) and country-specific (sv2, sv3) shocks. We

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:12:31PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote: > I did not "put it" like anything. I just saw an problem in my setup, > read some documents on the samba wiki, followed some advice and saw some > unexpected behaviour. Perhaps I imagined the wiki to be more moderated > that it really is, so my trust was misplaced. I don't blame anyone, all > I'm trying to

From: Dag Wieers <dag at wieers.com> > I have a real problem with this thread. It seems as if, according to some, > someone can only be with or against Red Hat. Yes, that was my major complaint too. > I'm sure Red Hat has made stupid decisions, has adopted buggy software and > are responsible for some of the headaches people have had. And I'm sure > even Red Hat

On 10/2/18 1:07 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Tue, 2 Oct 2018 12:40:19 +0200 > Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> On 10/1/18 8:40 PM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 19:28:29 +0200 >>> Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Louis and

Hello, I have an LG GSA-4163B drive. Recently I had many problems with the drive not recognizing correct writing speed, and locking up hard on many DVD-RW media. When I bought the drive, the latest firmware was at version A100, and it was available bundled with a DOS flasher. Unfortunately LG dropped DOS support, and now all the firmware updates are Windows only. As the drive was barely usable