similar to: ads_connect: Connection refused

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "ads_connect: Connection refused"

2008 Aug 12
1
Sendmail is not putting the full information in the received header anymore
Previously, when our server received an email it would slap the rcpt to in the received headers by adding a for <...> any ideas what has changed? Any pointers would be grateful. Headers received today: Return-Path: <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx220.postini.com [64.18.3.120]) by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id
2004 Oct 08
1
something
Hello , I write this letter 'cas i have a problem and I dont know how to fix It! I can share folder without problem, but if they are on the linux file system. If I try to share something whitch is on a fat partition, this share want root account to connect in ! How to change this .. Is there a option that can aply share like guest ok even the filesystem ! I will be very happy if you answer
2016 Sep 22
3
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement
Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted? Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources -Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpyeron at pdinc.us] > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08 > To: 'centos-devel at centos.org' > Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement >
2014 Dec 04
3
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil > sites with New DoDCAC > > I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved > DADEMS recently? DADMS is a Navy system, but yes Centos is approved for use by DISA. You would
2005 May 16
1
Re: nazi spam in German over list address
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpyeron@pdinc.us] > And add the reply-to samba@samba.org, there is too much > accidental off > list traffic. I disagree. Changing it will create accidental on-list traffic, which inconveniences far more people. It's not like replying to the list is hard now, if it's what you want to do. I'm stuck using
2016 Sep 22
2
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliancestatement
Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ? Regards On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org >> [mailto:centos-docs-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39
2010 Dec 09
4
5.5 x86_64 live cd
In the bang head and repeat mode here. The live usb partition is /dev/sda1 Reboot / power on It auto mounts the /dev/sda2 as ext4 on /mnt/disc/sda2 $ umount /mnt/disc/sda2 $ mkdir /root/foo $ mke2fs /dev/sda2 $ mount /dev/sda2 /root/foo Kernel panic Snip from the kernel panic: ?????? list_del+0xb/0x71 cache_alloc_refill+0xf1/0x186 ext2_fill_super+0x0/0xa37 .... system_call+0x7e/0x83 --
2014 Dec 04
1
DoD approval of Centos Was RE: Firefox fails to authenticate .mil sites with New DoDCAC
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42 > > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant. >
2010 Feb 16
4
Apache bandwidth limiting?
Can this be done with stock centos 4? Or can this even be done with the extras repo? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore,
2004 Dec 28
1
Re: Re: group policies in samba PDC for windows 2000 professional and xp clients (fwd)
sorry, the darn reply to got me again ---------- Forwarded message ---------- can you remote regedit from linux? if so, you can execute on logon from the samba server a push of the keys, you can even make a queue of pushes that run only once. -jason pyeron On Tue, 28 Dec 2004, Danny Paul wrote: > The only thing I've tried with any success is to find the registry keys that > need
2008 Jan 06
2
I am confused. Chmod / chown issues?
Where did I go wrong? [root at mail busdev]# stat . File: `.' Size: 4096 Blocks: 16 IO Block: 32768 Directory Device: ah/10d Inode: 147591 Links: 5 Access: (0750/drwxr-x---) Uid: (56755/ busdev) Gid: (56755/ busdev) Access: 2008-01-06 15:49:53.000000000 -0500 Modify: 2008-01-06 15:49:15.000000000 -0500 Change: 2008-01-06 15:59:59.000000000 -0500 [root at
2009 Apr 02
17
[OT] Godaddy hell...
Can I get some recommendations: We are looking for a hosting provider (other than godaddy) with 1: SLA 2: SSH access 3: subversion/rsync or the ability to install binaries / compile source. Would like them to include http/https and email. Any suggestions? -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -
2010 Aug 01
2
/bin/su wont work inside a chroot?
On centos 4 (i386 chroot on an x86_64) it just prompts me for a password. Any suggesstion on where to start looking? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443)
2008 Feb 21
3
Huge mailq
Where should we start on preventing this type of problem? [root at server34 mqueue]# find | wc -l 185259 -jason -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555
2019 Feb 13
3
error on the modificed permission
On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:17:40 +0100 marco pirola via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > No but in the file fstab i have > UUID=30a7a2fe-e1b0-4336-a6b6-7f11390f7afa /home           ext4 > user_xattr      0       2 And it shouldn't be there, it is part of the ext4 default settings. Just a thought, are the acl & xattr packages installed ? Rowland
2011 May 14
2
Apache in chroot reporting every client is 16.0.0.0
Not sure where to start on this. I went to examine a log file today and noticed a password protected internal file was being accessed from 16.0.0.0. Upon further review every log entry has the same IP. Accessing apache from localhost also reports 16.0.0.0. Google is not being my friend right now, any advice? Kernel: 2.6.9-89.0.29.Elsmp In the chroot: httpd-suexec-2.0.52-41.ent.7.centos4
2018 Jul 02
2
Exchange 2010?
In our lab we have installed Exchange 2007 SP1 against samba 4.8.2 on Windows Server 2008R2 and Windows Server 2012R2. (not fully tested yet) In attempts to install Exchange 2010 we have had many stumbling blocks. Has anyone successfully installed and can share what preparatory steps they took? The only information we could find on the web is
2008 Apr 10
1
12V computing?
Does anyone on the list have recommendations on 12VDC based hardware which runs a stock Centos 4 (or even 5)? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555
2016 Sep 22
1
VPAT for centos 7 - section 508compliancestatement
let me chase that up, I dont really understand what a VPAT might be, looks to be US centric - but it also looks like it aims to make assertions on and from the CentOS project side. best to work it via the board first. Regards On 22/09/16 22:27, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I posted on the dev list last October, no feedback. > > How (did not seem to be a high level issue for board concern, it
2015 Feb 17
2
Intermittent problem, likely disk IO related - mptscsih: ioc0: attempting task abort!
> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Murphy > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:58 > > I think the panic is the consequence of drive write failure. > So the actual > problem is before the panic call trace. Most of the time it panics without any warning, but once there was: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Pyeron > > Sent: Sunday,