similar to: Info on NetShareEnum RAP throwing "User has insufficient privilege"

After boot: promp and typing <ENTER> following messages appear: loading Vmlinuz.... loading initrd.img....... Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the Kernel. and the system reboots. Q: Who has the control at that stage? ISOLINUX or Kernel? This question is arised in order to know where to address some support. Thanks Manfredo

Hello, I am searching for a Samba counterpart of the Windows API function NetShareEnum http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb525387%28VS.85%29.aspx - a function that lists the smb resources of a given server. It googled quite a lot and had a quick look on the libsmbclient header but did not find anything that helped. `smbclient -L' does what I look for amongst other things ... I am

Hi all! I believe there is a bug regarding NetShareEnum command when run against a Win 2003 server. When run I only get back one share and then I get Segmentation fault. Using NetShareGetInfo 'sharename' works perfectly and also NET LIST SHARE. Any suggestions? Samba version is 3.21.rc-1 running on a FC 4 machine. Regards, Henrik

Running recent cvs from head branch, attempting to list shares on a machine running win2k. Can anyone tell what is wrong here. It does have several shares including a printer. I can connect with: smbclient /chub/SHARE -U Adminstrator (and get prompted for password) What does the line `NetShareEnum failed' below, mean (Sorry about verbose output) #

I have only this platform to try it on, but observe the following inconsistencies: (from the manpage for 'net'): RAP PRINTQ RAP PRINTQ LIST QUEUE_NAME Lists the specified print queue and print jobs on the server. If the QUEUE_NAME is omitted, all queues are listed. ...OK, so: [novosirj@njmsa ~]> /products/samba/bin/net rap printq list ljndemo No command: list

Hello: I have a Windows 2003 Server that is causing rpcclient to SEGV via the following command: $ rpcclient -U Administrator%foobar -c 'netshareenum 502' <server> ... type: 0x6269: SEC_DESC_OWNER_DEFAULTED SEC_DESC_DACL_DEFAULTED SEC_DESC_SACL_DEFAULTED SEC_DESC_DACL_TRUSTED SEC_DESC_SACL_AUTO_INHERIT_REQ SEC_DESC_SACL_PROTECTED SEC_DESC_RM_CONTROL_VALID SACL Segmentation fault

Hi All, I have been using the 'net rap share' command to enumerate Windows shares and CIFS shares hosted on Filers. I have realized though in some cases that using this command does not show all shares as does using 'net share'. I have looked at the shares hosted on this particular windows box and cannot find any difference between the ones that are enumerated using 'net rap

Hello! One of our guys created a short rap sequence (7 MB): http://www.nativeinstruments.de/tmp/vmrap.wav Andi -- -> Andreas Roedl -> Senior IT Manager -> NATIVE INSTRUMENTS GmbH -> andreas.roedl@native-instruments.de -> Schlesische Strasse 28 -> http://www.native-instruments.de/ -> D-10997 Berlin -> Tel. +49-30-61 10 35-430 -> Germany

Hello list! I've been trying to list the users from a group of my samba server (running on an OpenBSD 4.2 box) by using "net rap groupmember list GROUPNAME -S PDC -U administrator%password -w DOMAIN", but I get nothing in return. By running the command with a -d for debug purposes, I get the messages above:

I'm trying to validate user/password pair in a domain without actually being joined (no account in AD server). It is important for me to do it whith this particular condition. My Samba version doesn't implement this command yet (net rap validate). Is there another way to do it? My Samba version is 3.0.33. Should I upgrade to a specific version in which this command is already implemented?

I am using Puppet 3.1.0 on a CentOS 6.3 machines. The puppet master and puppet agents use CentOS 6.3 as their OS. I have a puppet script (init.pp file for the puppet module) that contains the following exec type: exec { "postgres init": cwd => "/applications/module", command => "bash initializePostgres.sh", user => "postgres", group =>

OK, I found a solution: trusted_users = exim:dovecot in my exim.conf fixed it. Anyway this is an important change of behavour between 2.2 und 2.3 In 2.2 the "dovecot" under exims "trusted_users" was not necessary. Olaf On 04/20/2018 02:53 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: >> Hi (Stephan?), >> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3

Hi Aki, On 4/4/20 8:12 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > Can you provide doveconf -n and try turning on mail_debug=yes on both ends and try doveadm -Dv expunge .... mail_debug=yes is on on both ends and dovecot was restarted but anyway nothing is logged when I issue "doveadm -Dv expunge " In the shell where I issue the "expunge" I see the following: # /usr/bin/doveadm -Dv expunge

On 04/23/2018 03:46 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > On 04/23/2018 03:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: >> >> >> Op 20-4-2018 om 14:01 schreef Olaf Hopp: >>> Hi (Stephan?), >>> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of >>> a redirected mail or simply a bug ? >>> >>> A sends

On 05/09/2018 11:10 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 09/05/2018 om 10:17 schreef Ralf Hildebrandt: >> * Stephan Bosch <stephan at rename-it.nl>: >>> >>> Op 08/05/2018 om 10:34 schreef Olaf Hopp: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I had an email with 58 recipients in the "To" and 13 in the "CC" >>>>

<!doctype html> <html> <head> <meta charset="UTF-8"> </head> <body> <div> Can you provide doveconf -n and try turning on mail_debug=yes on both ends and try doveadm -Dv expunge .... </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Aki </div> <blockquote type="cite"> <div>

On 04/23/2018 03:22 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > > > Op 20-4-2018 om 14:01 schreef Olaf Hopp: >> Hi (Stephan?), >> is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of >> a redirected mail or simply a bug ? >> >> A sends mail to B, B redirects to C >> C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender.

Olaf Hopp <Olaf.Hopp at kit.edu> wrote: > And I have a new one just for "unknown user" and here my bantime and findtime > are much bigger and the retries are just '2'. So here I'm much harsher. > I'll keep an eye on my logs and maybe some more twaeking is necessary. Just be careful about typos (like twaeking!): users could simply misspell their username,

On 03/12/2015 12:02 AM, Stephan Bosch wrote: > On 3/11/2015 11:10 AM, Olaf Hopp wrote: >> Please see the thread with subject >> "Sieve permissions issue following update" >> I tested sucessfully a developper issue last month >> on the hint of Stephan. Yesterday I started to test the currenr RCs. >> >> First I was disappointed, because the error

On 04/20/2018 02:01 PM, Olaf Hopp wrote: > Hi (Stephan?), > is it a new feature of dovecot 2.3 /pigeonhole 0.5 that a sieve "redirect" changes the envelope sender of > a redirected mail or simply a bug ? > > A sends mail to B, B redirects to C > C sees B (not A!) as envelope sender. > It is not a problem if C gets the mail but if that mail bounces > for various