similar to: port mapping

Dear All, a friend of mine who has a small office want to have a configuration like this: * around 3 people can have full access to internet * around 1-2 people can just have email access (can send and receive email to any address) * the rest of the people in the company just can have internal email (can send and receive email just to/from the peer - on the same domain). I think I can

Hi, Is there anybody ever have an experience install NoMachine NX Server on centos? Is there anything need to get special attention? Thanks in advance -- Tanu --

Dear All, If I want make a lan users (with private IP) can access the internet just after passing the verification, what options do I have? What I want is: * If I user want to access the internet * He (must) run the browser * whatever the address he typed on the address bar, he will be brought to the verification location, which will be 'force' him to enter his username and

Dear All, How to find out that a certain lib place on which package? I prompted that a certain library is not exists on my system, but I don't know which package should I look for to install. Thanks. -- Tanu --

Hi, I installed CentOS using GNOME, but now I want to try it using KDE, how can I change it? Thanks in advance -- Tanu --

Help. I've got an Ubuntu server running fine with Samba. I can connect remotely using an iPhone app using an alternate port number that I've configured to NAT to port 445 through my firewall. But, my ISP has blocked port 445 for security reasons and I have no way of Mapping a drive in a remote Windows machine because port 445 is blocked and there doesn't seem to be any way to edit

I am working in an environment with an HP-UX NIS that my Red Hat ES 4.x system is using for Unix access controls. My Red Hat system is serving as an NFS server for the HP-UX users who also could be Windows users coming from a Windows Server 2003 active directory. I have tested some configurations of SAMBA using winbind, but I don't get the results I want. What happens when using winbind

Thanks for the reply, Actually I m aiming towards determining two values: - number of basic blocks in a program For this I have used Statistic facility provided in llvm and increasing the counter for each basic block for each function.but for some reason , I m getting different number everytime !! Is Statistic is the right way to do it ? - Average basic block size in a program ( in bytes)

Thanks !! But if i generate a .bc file like this and then run my pass over it like this : opt -load /home/llvm-cvs/llvm/Debug/lib/LLVMHello.so -hello <helloprog.bc> class_prog.bc Will the new .bc file (class_prog.bc) be also without optimizations ?opt also does some optimizations.Can I control them ? Thanks Tanu Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Mon, 25 Apr 2005,

Hi, I activate samba on Centos 5, but I always get NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE when issuing smbclient //GIServer/GIApp -usmbuser after I enter the password to the prompt. What things should I look for to solve this? -- Best Regards, Sobari Tanuwijaya --------- Without positive attitudes, the best techniques in the world won't have much impact. --Anonymous--

On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > I wish to compile without optimizations ( the option being turned off ) > but still generate bytecode file. > > Options -S , -c removes optimizations but I also need .bc file to > experiment and use further. Passing "-Wa,-disable-opt -Wl,-disable-opt" will disable *all* cleanup and optimizations

Thanks for replying, Yes, I think too that the bytecode file is corrupted. This is the file : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 18:40 +0930, Ron wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 05:35:51PM +0300, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I'm updating OpenEmbedded-core's speexdsp from 1.2rc1 (when it still was > > a part of the speex source tree) to 1.2rc3. I found out that building > > the new version for aarch64 fails in resample_neon.h (the target machine

On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > > I have a doubt. > > This is an excerpt of the raw report I get after running Spec benchmarks > through llvm-test.I am trying to calculate the program execution > time.Does the output result in bold corresponds to "lli time" in > Makefile.spec ? I am not interested in llc, jit or cbe.I simply need the > normal

Thanks a lot for replying. I would check my system gcc configuration. I got very useful replies from dev list regarding my earlier question but yet not able to determine block size. That I want in total size of a block in a function in bytes and not just the number of instructions.LLVM Tool gives most of the information e.g function bytes etc....but not individual block. Thanks Tanu Chris

Thanks for the reply :-) I am actually looking for ways to determine "size" of code segment when the program is in native code. Any suggestions to do that ? Tanu Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > > Hey, > > I have written a pass and wishes to measure its performance overhead > after running it over a

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64 Version: 4.0.1-5.4 Severity: important When using the the intel igb driver from the 3.2.0-0.bpo.4-amd64 kernel and debian squeeze hypervisor with a Intel 82576 quad port nic the first nic fails to get an IRQ mapping: relevant lines from dmesg ----8<---- [ 24.264857] Intel(R) Gigabit Ethernet Network Driver - version 3.2.10-k [ 24.264929] Copyright (c)

Dear all; Would anybody be able to tell me what the idmap configuration is to have Samba do the same SID-to-user/group mapping as the SSSD defaults? I was convinced I saw it on this list or the wiki not too long ago, but I cannot seem to find it. // Best wishes; Johan

Thanks a lot Chris. Regarding basic block size I wish to calculate both: - The number of bytecode bytes - The number of machine code bytes for some target? TS Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote: On Thu, 7 Apr 2005, Tanu Sharma wrote: > Thanks for the reply, > > Actually I m aiming towards determining two values: > > - number of basic blocks in a program For

FTR, my main concern with this kind of approach is the case where your platform has two compilers, only one of which has stdint.h Jean-Marc On 07/05/2015 11:10 AM, Tanu Kaskinen wrote: > From: Tanu Kaskinen <tanu.kaskinen at linux.intel.com> > > Not everyone who includes speexdsp_config_types.h will have a test > which defines those, and if we've chosen to use the stdint