Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "3.x & Solaris 8 lockups"
2005 Feb 28
1
Samba 3.0.11 port and install issue to solaris 8
Hi Samba Team
I have ported samba 3.0.11 to Solaris 8 because of the security warning
for Samba 2.2.8a
but it will not start from inetd. I have taken 3 weeks to find that it
starts OK as a standalone daemon
using a startup script /etc/init.d/samba
#!/bin/sh
# Samba startup
case $1 in
'start')
echo "Starting smbd..."
2005 Mar 05
0
Compiling samba on Solaris 8 --with-ads
>
>
>> For historical reasons, the administrator is member in lots of groups. As
>> a result the ticket size is too big for UDB, so the W2k3-server sends an
>> KRB5KRB_ERR_RESPONSE_TOO_BIG (Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP)
>> error back to kinit.
>>
>> Unfortunatly this case is not handled in lib/krb5/get_in_tck.c -
>> krb5_get_in_cred().
2011 Jun 21
0
Building Samba 3.5.9 on Solaris 10
I wanted to build samba with CUPS and LDAP support, and put it into a
location from where it can be automounted by other systems. There were a
few gotchas I solved the hard way, to save anyone else's time, this is
what I did.
C compiler I used is Sun's Studio.
Solaris sed behaves differently to Sunfreeware sed
tolka source3 $ echo libwbclient.so.0|/usr/local/bin/sed
2002 Oct 08
1
Fwd: SSHD logging on Solaris 8?
Sorry to send this to the wrong list. But it appears that the general list
is mostly utilized as a SPAM vector and/or is absentee moderated (the
message has yet to make it to the archives, despite being dated days
earlier than messages which are there). In any event, I'd like to know if
anyone could provide me with some more information than is available in the
manpages, FAQ, and other
2004 Dec 13
1
Solaris: Linking bin/smbd, /usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- E
Solaris 9
Samba 3.0.9
gcc 3.3.2 (from SunFreeware)
config opts: ./configure --prefix=/opt/samba
Hello,
I'm having some trouble compiling the latest samba. Even using
"--with-gnu-ld" as a configuration switch it still wants to use the
Solaris-native ld. Of course, the gcc from SunFreeware says as much:
"It was compiled to use the SUN assembler and loader usually in
2010 Aug 22
1
rsync failing on solaris 10
I downloaded rsync from sunfreeware.com, installed the dependencies and
installed rsync without error, however when I run it I get errors, see:
# /usr/local/bin/rsync -a -A -h -u -p -e rsh --progress --rsh=/usr/bin/rsh
root at 192.168.0.160:/usr/include .
sh: /usr/local/bin/rsync: not found
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [Receiver]
rsync error: error in rsync
2006 May 13
0
Here's a recipe for Samba+Active Directory on Solaris 9
Samba 3.0.22 on Solaris 9 with Active Directory
===============================================
Dan Shearer
Version 1.0
May 2006
Official Samba binaries for Solaris 9 are not enabled for ADS
support. Enabling ADS is much harder than it looks, mostly because of
the crazy Solaris 9 build environment.
Here is the simplest reproducable recipe I could find for ADS-enabled
Samba on a default fresh
2002 Jul 17
2
Build on Solaris 8 gcc-3.1 fails make check
Dear R-help,
I am trying to build R-1.5.1 on a Sun Blade 100 (sparc).
It fails make check when var(1) returns NaN instead of NA.
Using gcc-2.95.3 from sunfreeware.com, the build succeeds and passes
make check
I have:
Solaris 8
gcc-3.1 (built on that machine from sources and installed in
/usr/local/gcc-3.1 with binaries symlink'ed to /usr/local/bin)
A synopsis is at the bottom of
2002 Jul 17
2
Build on Solaris 8 gcc-3.1 fails make check
Dear R-help,
I am trying to build R-1.5.1 on a Sun Blade 100 (sparc).
It fails make check when var(1) returns NaN instead of NA.
Using gcc-2.95.3 from sunfreeware.com, the build succeeds and passes
make check
I have:
Solaris 8
gcc-3.1 (built on that machine from sources and installed in
/usr/local/gcc-3.1 with binaries symlink'ed to /usr/local/bin)
A synopsis is at the bottom of
2010 Jul 16
8
[Bug 1799] New: Unable to login through PAM on Solaris 8 x86 due to PAM_TTY
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1799
Summary: Unable to login through PAM on Solaris 8 x86 due to
PAM_TTY
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.5p1
Platform: ix86
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: PAM support
AssignedTo:
2010 Mar 04
0
Compiling wine in Solaris.
Hi. I am trying to compile wine in Solaris 10 x86 platform.
I am getting the following errors:
Code:
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dvik/wine-1.1.39/dlls/acledit'
../../tools/makedep -C. -S../.. -T../.. main.c
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dvik/wine-1.1.39/dlls/acledit'
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dvik/wine-1.1.39/dlls/acledit'
gcc -c -I. -I.
2002 Oct 09
0
SSHD logging on Solaris 8?
Hi Eric,
logging is configured in sshd_config with
-
# Logging
# obsoletes QuietMode and FascistLogging
SyslogFacility AUTH
LogLevel INFO
-
where 'SyslogFacility' specifies which "facility" (sorry;-), i.e. e.g. 'auth', 'daemon', 'mail' etc should be used and with 'LogLevel' you can specify how verbosely sshd should be.
Of course the
2010 May 07
1
Fwd: RE: Problems 'make'ing on Solaris 9/10
On Solaris 10 (x86), trying to compile samba 3.5.2
I have downloaded GCC 3.4.x., make, binutils (ld etc) and sed from
Sunfreeware.
GCC (gcc -v) has /usr/ccs/bin/ld hardcoded so the only way around it was
to symlink to the gnu one.
# mv /usr/ccs/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld.1
# ln -s /usr/local/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld
# ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/talloc-2.0.1
When setting some
2010 Oct 04
1
Need help compiling Samba on Solaris
I had limited success compiling 3.4.8 and 3.5.4 on Solaris 10 8/07 x86.
I downloaded the source code from Samba.org and the dependencies from
sunfreeware.com. After some googling and trial and error with the
LDDFLAGS, CPPFLAGS and such, it sort of compiled. I need to know how to
properly set things up. How can I find out what version of dependencies
you need for a particular samba version?
2008 Dec 27
2
stdint.h on Solaris 7
Hi together,
here is a little success tory how I got flac 1.2.1 (ZIP from downloads
page) compiled with Solaris 7:
First of all you need a lot packages from sunfreeware.com
If you have installed the required packages you may end up with an error
that says there is no stdint.h on your system.
On an other forum I have read upgrading to Solaris 10 "fixes" this
problem but that might not
2008 Dec 28
1
stdint.h on Solaris 7
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Both <inttypes.h> and <stdarg.h> are part of the 1999 ISO C Standard
> (yes, a standard that is now 10 years old). Any compiler which has one
> or the other missing does not comply with the standard.
Fairly old standard. ;)
>
>
> Maybe you can ask SUN to fix their compiler.
Okay, maybe that was not fully clearto you. I use the GCC from
2006 Nov 06
2
Samba 3.0.10 / Solaris 8 / Windows 2003
Any help would be very much appreciated.
My Configuration-
Solaris 8 - hostname = vail
Samba 3.0.10 (downloaded from sunfreeware.com)
As per the instructions on sunfreeware, I have also installed the
following packages-
libgcc-3.3
libiconv-1.9.2
libintl-3.4.0
ncurses-5.4
popt 1.7
readline 5.1
Also on my network-
A Windows 2003 ES domain controller: hostname = SEEDS1 domain = SEEDS
A Windows
2002 Feb 26
2
problem running ssh-keygen in Solaris 8 x86
Hi,
I encountered the following when i run the below command on my Solaris 8 x86
box:
#ssh-keygen -t rsa1 -f /usr/local/etc/ssh_host_key -N ""
I got the following error:
Segmentation fault - core dumped
Does anyone have any idea what is wrong? I am using pre-compiled packages
downloaded from sunfreeware.com.
Regards,
Matthew
This communication contains confidential or privileged
2010 Dec 01
1
Zaptel / Asterisk on Solaris
Hello nice people :)
I have been struggling with trying to get Zaptel from
http://www.slimey.org/zaptel-solaris.tar.gz on a Solaris 5.11 VM I obtained
from the OpenSolaris Website. I have tried installing all the necessary
packages, yet I keep getting errors no matter if I try using the gcc
available at sunfreeware.com OR the blastwave CSWgcc packages and GNU
'gmake' (as suggested
2000 Aug 08
1
samba runaway processes
[This is a discussion that started earlier about automounter]
John Posenau wrote:
> What I've found so far is that the windows client (any machine, roving
> profile) with this user's account authenticates in a samba domain on machine
> A. His files are located on machine B (not running Samba). Machine A
> automount his nisplus_home. A little indirection but hey.
As