similar to: 3.x & Solaris 8 lockups

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "3.x & Solaris 8 lockups"

2005 Feb 28
1
Samba 3.0.11 port and install issue to solaris 8
Hi Samba Team I have ported samba 3.0.11 to Solaris 8 because of the security warning for Samba 2.2.8a but it will not start from inetd. I have taken 3 weeks to find that it starts OK as a standalone daemon using a startup script /etc/init.d/samba #!/bin/sh # Samba startup case $1 in 'start') echo "Starting smbd..."
2005 Mar 05
0
Compiling samba on Solaris 8 --with-ads
> > >> For historical reasons, the administrator is member in lots of groups. As >> a result the ticket size is too big for UDB, so the W2k3-server sends an >> KRB5KRB_ERR_RESPONSE_TOO_BIG (Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP) >> error back to kinit. >> >> Unfortunatly this case is not handled in lib/krb5/get_in_tck.c - >> krb5_get_in_cred().
2011 Jun 21
0
Building Samba 3.5.9 on Solaris 10
I wanted to build samba with CUPS and LDAP support, and put it into a location from where it can be automounted by other systems. There were a few gotchas I solved the hard way, to save anyone else's time, this is what I did. C compiler I used is Sun's Studio. Solaris sed behaves differently to Sunfreeware sed tolka source3 $ echo libwbclient.so.0|/usr/local/bin/sed
2002 Oct 08
1
Fwd: SSHD logging on Solaris 8?
Sorry to send this to the wrong list. But it appears that the general list is mostly utilized as a SPAM vector and/or is absentee moderated (the message has yet to make it to the archives, despite being dated days earlier than messages which are there). In any event, I'd like to know if anyone could provide me with some more information than is available in the manpages, FAQ, and other
2004 Dec 13
1
Solaris: Linking bin/smbd, /usr/ccs/bin/ld: illegal option -- E
Solaris 9 Samba 3.0.9 gcc 3.3.2 (from SunFreeware) config opts: ./configure --prefix=/opt/samba Hello, I'm having some trouble compiling the latest samba. Even using "--with-gnu-ld" as a configuration switch it still wants to use the Solaris-native ld. Of course, the gcc from SunFreeware says as much: "It was compiled to use the SUN assembler and loader usually in
2010 Aug 22
1
rsync failing on solaris 10
I downloaded rsync from sunfreeware.com, installed the dependencies and installed rsync without error, however when I run it I get errors, see: # /usr/local/bin/rsync -a -A -h -u -p -e rsh --progress --rsh=/usr/bin/rsh root at 192.168.0.160:/usr/include . sh: /usr/local/bin/rsync: not found rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [Receiver] rsync error: error in rsync
2006 May 13
0
Here's a recipe for Samba+Active Directory on Solaris 9
Samba 3.0.22 on Solaris 9 with Active Directory =============================================== Dan Shearer Version 1.0 May 2006 Official Samba binaries for Solaris 9 are not enabled for ADS support. Enabling ADS is much harder than it looks, mostly because of the crazy Solaris 9 build environment. Here is the simplest reproducable recipe I could find for ADS-enabled Samba on a default fresh
2002 Jul 17
2
Build on Solaris 8 gcc-3.1 fails make check
Dear R-help, I am trying to build R-1.5.1 on a Sun Blade 100 (sparc). It fails make check when var(1) returns NaN instead of NA. Using gcc-2.95.3 from sunfreeware.com, the build succeeds and passes make check I have: Solaris 8 gcc-3.1 (built on that machine from sources and installed in /usr/local/gcc-3.1 with binaries symlink'ed to /usr/local/bin) A synopsis is at the bottom of
2002 Jul 17
2
Build on Solaris 8 gcc-3.1 fails make check
Dear R-help, I am trying to build R-1.5.1 on a Sun Blade 100 (sparc). It fails make check when var(1) returns NaN instead of NA. Using gcc-2.95.3 from sunfreeware.com, the build succeeds and passes make check I have: Solaris 8 gcc-3.1 (built on that machine from sources and installed in /usr/local/gcc-3.1 with binaries symlink'ed to /usr/local/bin) A synopsis is at the bottom of
2010 Jul 16
8
[Bug 1799] New: Unable to login through PAM on Solaris 8 x86 due to PAM_TTY
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1799 Summary: Unable to login through PAM on Solaris 8 x86 due to PAM_TTY Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.5p1 Platform: ix86 OS/Version: Solaris Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: PAM support AssignedTo:
2010 Mar 04
0
Compiling wine in Solaris.
Hi. I am trying to compile wine in Solaris 10 x86 platform. I am getting the following errors: Code: make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dvik/wine-1.1.39/dlls/acledit' ../../tools/makedep -C. -S../.. -T../.. main.c make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/dvik/wine-1.1.39/dlls/acledit' make[1]: Entering directory `/home/dvik/wine-1.1.39/dlls/acledit' gcc -c -I. -I.
2002 Oct 09
0
SSHD logging on Solaris 8?
Hi Eric, logging is configured in sshd_config with - # Logging # obsoletes QuietMode and FascistLogging SyslogFacility AUTH LogLevel INFO - where 'SyslogFacility' specifies which "facility" (sorry;-), i.e. e.g. 'auth', 'daemon', 'mail' etc should be used and with 'LogLevel' you can specify how verbosely sshd should be. Of course the
2010 May 07
1
Fwd: RE: Problems 'make'ing on Solaris 9/10
On Solaris 10 (x86), trying to compile samba 3.5.2 I have downloaded GCC 3.4.x., make, binutils (ld etc) and sed from Sunfreeware. GCC (gcc -v) has /usr/ccs/bin/ld hardcoded so the only way around it was to symlink to the gnu one. # mv /usr/ccs/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld.1 # ln -s /usr/local/bin/ld /usr/ccs/bin/ld # ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/talloc-2.0.1 When setting some
2010 Oct 04
1
Need help compiling Samba on Solaris
I had limited success compiling 3.4.8 and 3.5.4 on Solaris 10 8/07 x86. I downloaded the source code from Samba.org and the dependencies from sunfreeware.com. After some googling and trial and error with the LDDFLAGS, CPPFLAGS and such, it sort of compiled. I need to know how to properly set things up. How can I find out what version of dependencies you need for a particular samba version?
2008 Dec 27
2
stdint.h on Solaris 7
Hi together, here is a little success tory how I got flac 1.2.1 (ZIP from downloads page) compiled with Solaris 7: First of all you need a lot packages from sunfreeware.com If you have installed the required packages you may end up with an error that says there is no stdint.h on your system. On an other forum I have read upgrading to Solaris 10 "fixes" this problem but that might not
2008 Dec 28
1
stdint.h on Solaris 7
Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Both <inttypes.h> and <stdarg.h> are part of the 1999 ISO C Standard > (yes, a standard that is now 10 years old). Any compiler which has one > or the other missing does not comply with the standard. Fairly old standard. ;) > > > Maybe you can ask SUN to fix their compiler. Okay, maybe that was not fully clearto you. I use the GCC from
2006 Nov 06
2
Samba 3.0.10 / Solaris 8 / Windows 2003
Any help would be very much appreciated. My Configuration- Solaris 8 - hostname = vail Samba 3.0.10 (downloaded from sunfreeware.com) As per the instructions on sunfreeware, I have also installed the following packages- libgcc-3.3 libiconv-1.9.2 libintl-3.4.0 ncurses-5.4 popt 1.7 readline 5.1 Also on my network- A Windows 2003 ES domain controller: hostname = SEEDS1 domain = SEEDS A Windows
2002 Feb 26
2
problem running ssh-keygen in Solaris 8 x86
Hi, I encountered the following when i run the below command on my Solaris 8 x86 box: #ssh-keygen -t rsa1 -f /usr/local/etc/ssh_host_key -N "" I got the following error: Segmentation fault - core dumped Does anyone have any idea what is wrong? I am using pre-compiled packages downloaded from sunfreeware.com. Regards, Matthew This communication contains confidential or privileged
2010 Dec 01
1
Zaptel / Asterisk on Solaris
Hello nice people :) I have been struggling with trying to get Zaptel from http://www.slimey.org/zaptel-solaris.tar.gz on a Solaris 5.11 VM I obtained from the OpenSolaris Website. I have tried installing all the necessary packages, yet I keep getting errors no matter if I try using the gcc available at sunfreeware.com OR the blastwave CSWgcc packages and GNU 'gmake' (as suggested
2000 Aug 08
1
samba runaway processes
[This is a discussion that started earlier about automounter] John Posenau wrote: > What I've found so far is that the windows client (any machine, roving > profile) with this user's account authenticates in a samba domain on machine > A. His files are located on machine B (not running Samba). Machine A > automount his nisplus_home. A little indirection but hey. As