similar to: Public share

I have am hitting a wall with pdbedit, as shown below. Any workarounds would be greatly appreciated. I am encountering the inability to change any users (profile) SID on Samba 3.x for Linux and BSD, which causes the accounts to no longer recognize their local Samba 2 profiles once they join Samba 3 domain. If I add a new user and pdbedit -a user -U SID it ignores the -U. The old profiles appear

You think Microsoft's mailing lists and forums are better? Just wait (and wait, and and ...). Oh, that's right, you can call Microsft for help ,,, and shell out $295 per. Dimitri John McLoskey wrote: > Thanks everyone for your lack of any response whatsoever, I find it builds > character to be ignored throughout challenges I encounter in my life. Since > I was unable to

Hi all, my samba server has security set to user, and it works for each share I specify a valid users list. However, the following public share does not work: [PUB_SMB] comment = Cartella pubblica (Mac e PC) - Non viene fatto il backup path = /mnt/samba/pub_smb browsable = yes available = yes writable = yes

hi all, I'm facing a problem with a brand new installation on fedora 9. packages were updated right after the installation, so the samba packages are of the latest available version (3.2.0-17.fc9). at the first run were created all the tree of tdb files under /var/lib/samba. now I create a new user: [root@barbara Scrivania]# smbpasswd -a barbara New SMB password: Retype new SMB password:

Hi, We migrated from redhat 7.1 to redhat 3 ES and ran into one road block after the other. Most of them were solved except this last one. Users cannot change their passwords and then I read somewhere that samba 3.0 and MS KB828471 or 741 don't want to be friends. Then I upgraded my samba to be samba 3.0.7 (which i guess is the latest).... Then I un-installed the KBB patch being accused.

hi all, we need to access a debian 3 /samba 3 beta 2 share from w2k-clients and xp-clients. my "normal" workstation is working under w2k, if i try to connect the share it works fine, no matter if i use my own workstation or a workstation running win xp. if someone who has a xp-machine as normal workstation tries to connect, the connetion to the samba-share is refused, no matter, if he

Have a perplexing problem here... If you UNC to the IP the shares show up fine, if you UNC to the DNS name when I go into the shares they seem to be pointed to /tmp. Also the printer isn't visible when you use UNC to DNS name. Since I'm using server based security is it possible it can't indentify me? [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP netbios name = SMBSVR server string = Samba

Hi, i have some problems using my RedHat 9 Samba Server. I created Shares for my W2K Windows Clients. All Clients can access the Shares, so no problem there. Now i tried to join my W2K machines to the domain and get an error: "Canot join domain, the credentials supplied conflict with an existing set". I read in some newsgroups that "net use * /d" helps but it doesn't

Hello! I'm trying to migrate printer settings from a XP machine to my samba server but failed: [root@smbSrv ~] #net rpc printer migrate settings HPDJ3500 -S winXP --destination=smbSvr -U admin%password migrating printer settings for: [\\winXP\HPDJ3500] / [HPDJ3500] could not set printerdataex: WERR_INVALID_NAME I don't know what means "ERR_INVALID_NAME". Is invalid printer

On 06/10/15 16:00, Dario Lesca wrote: > Il giorno mar, 06/10/2015 alle 15.14 +0100, Rowland Penny ha scritto: >> Would you care to share your very secret smb.conf file ? >> >> Rowland > [global] > workgroup = DOM > netbios aliases = s-software, s-print > server string = %L > interfaces = lo, eth0 > passdb backend = tdbsam:/etc/samba/account.tdb > log

Hello. I need to allow one of my users to add & delete shares on my Samba server through the 'server manager' applet on his client . This same user also writes some files to the same Samba server. I don't want the files that he writes to be owned/written by 'root' . The way I understand the 'add share command' currently, this is not possible. Am I missing

Il giorno mar, 06/10/2015 alle 15.14 +0100, Rowland Penny ha scritto: > Would you care to share your very secret smb.conf file ? > > Rowland [global] workgroup = DOM netbios aliases = s-software, s-print server string = %L interfaces = lo, eth0 passdb backend = tdbsam:/etc/samba/account.tdb log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 smb ports = 139 unix extensions = No

Greetings List, I've got 2 identical Samba Member servers on my domain,of which the global section of the smb.conf is identical. My config file is below: The difference? One's a 64 bit OS the other is 32 (I don't think this is the issue). The 32 bit system runs flawlessly,the 64 bit OS does not and when I execute pdbedit -L it does not return the ldap database

Hello, I hope this is not a dumb question, but I just need some clarification. I am trying to set up an Ubuntu Samba share for a lab with Windows computers (Vista and XP). I have two shares that are supposed to require authentication and one that is supposed to a public share with no login. I understand from reading the smb.conf manual that "security = user" makes Windows authenticate

Hi, First of all, my apologies for the extension of this message, but it is needeed for you to undertand my problem. Straight to the point: i have this domain in my company running in Samba 3.0.2 My users are: hcoelho, jardim, gamito, yesenia, smatias, fqueiros, faugusto, vamaro, peixinho, aragao, dina, pinho. I have this shares with the users that can access them and the correponding Linux

On Mon, 30 Apr 2018 20:32:26 +0200 Andrea Baldoni via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 05:04:29PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba > wrote: > > Hello Rowland. > > > I had to read this several times to understand it, then a few more > > because I didn't believe it. > > Well. In the industrial environment you may find

yes i have, this is my share-config: [share] path = /mnt/gluster/daten/share/ public = yes writeable = yes browseable = yes inherit permissions = Yes inherit acls = Yes map acl inherit = Yes nt acl support = yes vfs objects = acl_xattr F?bio Leandro Rodrigues Cordeiro schrieb: > Hi, > > Have you tried adding the share writeable? > [share] > writeable = yes > > att, >

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 05:04:29PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: Hello Rowland. > I had to read this several times to understand it, then a few more > because I didn't believe it. Well. In the industrial environment you may find everything ranging from CPM-86 onwards... old things talk via RS-232 or 422, the LAN equipped are regarded as "modern". In general all are

i am u sing AD integrated Samba with winbind,I need to share a samba home folder for every single user in my Active directory. since i dont wanna create every user's directory i want samba to manage it. however i dont wanna place the home folders on default path as the boot drive (/dev/sda) is very small to store the data, beside that, i do have storage /nas/users which is a mount point of my

Hello, I have upgraded my gentoo samba server to version 3.0.23c using the ebuild script on bugs.gentoo.org that was suggested top me on this list. I am having some trouble accessing my "public" folder and I have a "valid users = +users" for that share. I have tried using "valid users= +Solidus\users" as well and that does not work. The first way seems to work just