similar to: Compile from source FAILED - Mandrake 7.2

Mates, What would cause smbclient not to list my printer share?? (mandrake 7.2, 2.2.19 kernel) [david@Nemesis david]$ smbclient -U% -L localhost Domain=[RB_LAW] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.7] Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- guillory Disk David Guillory Bertin Disk Darren Bertin Rankin

Mates, I have configured samba 100 times, but this time, I'm doing something increadibly stupid that I just cannot see. Please HELP! I'm about to jump...... Background, Old samba sever (nemesis) being replaced with new one (bonza). Both are up and operating. All networking is OK, Name resolution is fine, etc. The problem is that all users can see all the shares on the

James, I have sent this to you directly and cc:ed the list for reasons that should become apparent below. THE SITUATION OS: mdk 7.2, 2.2.19 kernel - basically bone stock Latest addtions: samba 3.0.7-1 compiled from source (working fine); cups-1.1.18-1 from mdk rpm Reasons for additions: XP SP2 fun and games THE MYSTERY As any normal person does, I use

I never thought it would happen to me, but it did... I have read threads about slow copies from WinXX to Linux/Samba on the list in the past, but I don't recall a concise answer regarding what the cause was. THE PROBLEM: Trying to copy an 8 meg file from Win95 to my Linux/Samba box (named "Nemesis" - for good reason), the transfer speed slows to a crawl. The Win95 copy dialog box

POSTED TO THE LIST W/O ATTACHMENTS -------- Jerry, I am sending this to you directly because it contains the tcpdump information in addition to the samba logs just in case there is sensitive information contained in the files. What is happening is that samba 3.0.25c, after first running smoothly, is becoming very "chatty" across our LAN. I don't know why, but with no files or

Hi, I have somewhat successfully got Samba working where as users can map the drives to their win2k/xp workstations and wrote to the folders they are given permissions to. They can write to the folder, delete folders, write files, delete files, view the file listing, however, they can't open files. For instance, if there is a word document, they can't just double click on the share and

Listmates, I have had a few boxes where the 'matchname' message is filling my syslog with one new message ever ~40 seconds or so. No performance problems, just the log annoyance. An example of the messages are: Jan 11 13:43:03 nemesis smbd[2246]: [2010/01/11 13:43:03, 0] lib/util_sock.c:1685(get_peer_name) Jan 11 13:43:03 nemesis smbd[2246]: Matchname failed on Adrienne-PC.rbpllc.com

Not sure if this got through the 1st time, so I am trying a repost. I appologize if you get this twice, but I need help! -- David C. Rankin, J.D., P.E. Rankin * Bertin, PLLC 510 Ochiltree Street Nacogdoches, Texas 75961 (936) 715-9333 (936) 715-9339 fax www.rankin-bertin.com -- ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Rankin" <drankin@cox-internet.com> To: "samba"

Mates, In following chapter 35 "How to Compile Samba" I have looked at ./configure --help and I have a few questions. Originally I installed 2.0.9 via RPM, and of course there are no longer RPMs for mdk 7.2. On 7.2, smbd and nmbd are installed in /usr/sbin. The docs are in /usr/share/doc/samba-2.0.9. I don't know where the rest of the pieces of the puzzle were scattered by

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Folks, I've uploaded the *final* 3.0.23c roll up patch to http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/patch-3.0.23b-3.0.23c-gwc-2.diffs.gz. I've already cut the 3.0.23c tarballs so unless there is a major problem, this will be the final change set. Please report *any* bugs that you find. I'd like to wrap this one up and do the public 3.0.23c

Andrew, Jerry and the rest of the team: Hello again! It has been quite some time since I was here and waded the waters to set up bind8 and samba 2.07 on my trust mdk 7.2 box. (by the way, it is still working like a champ) over 400 days uptime before the last extended power outage. Well, obviously a lot has changed since the 2.07 days and I am now working on a SuSE 8.2 box with samba 2.2.7a

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================== "I think we just hit thread level Orange." -- anonymous ============================================================== Release Announcements ===================== This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is

Samba errors with smb QUERY_PATH_INFO, Error: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUNDFrom: Timothy D Newcomb Subject: Samba errors with smb QUERY_PATH_INFO, Error: STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND > Did you get an answer for this ? I am seeing it on an XP box and I have > the same problem..slow load time...in "my computer" Tim, No I didn't, thanks for the reply. I just figured that

Cross-posting scares me, but... Have you looked at the latest RPMs for SuSE, from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/samba/ ? They've worked like a charm for me, thus far (revision after revision, a simple rpm -U * seems to work...) -----Original Message----- From: david rankin [mailto:drankin@cox-internet.com] Sent: Mon 9/12/2005 5:30 PM To: samba; Suse Linux Subject: [SLE] SuSE 9.3 and

Mates, I dunno if nobody else is using the samba binaries to put 3.0.20-1 on SuSE 9.3 -- or -- if I'm just doing something stupid, but there seem to be library problems. Specifically, we are getting library errors for the *.so.2 libraries, regardless of whether we try via YAST or RPM. david@nemesis:~/Documents/linux/rpms/samba320> ll total 19970 -rw-r--r-- 1 david users 60998

Mates, Just got done configuring and compiling 3.0.7-1 on my Mandrake 7.2 box. The process was as follows: ./configure --prefix=/usr --with-smbmount make The following is a listing of the ../bin directory. Does it look like all the pieces got built and are about the right size?? Any feedback before doing the 'make install' would be appreciated..... [root@Nemesis source]# ls -al

Mates, Maybe I'm missing something very, very basic! I cannot see the share on my XP boxes. smbclient gives the following: skyline:/home/david # smbclient -U% -L ripper added interface ip=192.168.6.14 bcast=192.168.6.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Got a positive name query response from 127.0.0.1 ( 192.168.6.100 ) Domain=[RB_LAW] OS=[Windows 5.1] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager]

Listmates, After wrangling with the voltage value on the CyberPower 1000AVRLCD and now having 2 of them working, I though it would be a simple matter to move my APC BP650 from apcupsd to nut so that all 3 servers would be monitored on the same web interface. The APC is attached to an older box running openSuSE 11.0 with nut-2.2.2-66.1. (nut-classic). The APC BP650 uses a serial connection

Guys, I have probably missed an announcement or overlooked something in a changelog, but I just want to confirm what I'm seeing is expected behavior. I run samba in standalone mode and I have always checked operation with smbclient -U% -Llocalhost Now the faithful command returns an error: Connection to localhost failed (Error NT_STATUS_BAD_NETWORK_NAME) Simply using the hostname

Mates, Still can't get the latest samba binaries to inatall on SuSE 9.3. I've downloaded them from the samba site and from ftp://ftp.primastasys.com/pub/Samba-Packages/ still no joy. The problem is library related: nemesis:/home/david/Documents/linux/rpms/samba320 # rpm -Uvh * warning: cifs-mount-3.0.20-0.1.i586.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 414a57c3 error: Failed