similar to: Printers Showing up on Alternate Server Names

Hi all, I am running samba 3.0.6 on Linux and am wondering if anyone knows if it is possible to delete a print driver from the driver database? I have around 20 printers running off of this print server and occasionally we remove all of a certain type of printer. Also, for some reason, the drivers sometimes seem to become corrupt and it would be nice to be able to entirely remove a driver and

Hello all, I am attempting to setup a Samba 3.0.2a based PDC using OpenLDAP 2.2.6 for my user/group authentication backend. So far everything seems to be working properly, I can join the domain from a Win2k PC, login via an account created with smbldap-useradd.pl, map my home directory, run the proper login script, etc. However, with all of that working I'm still having difficulties getting

---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- FULL RSYNC LOG ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- /usr/bin/rsync -av --force --delete-excluded --exclude-from=/usr/local/etc/snapback/snapback.exclude -e ssh --delete peru.cbm.mercyships.org:/ /home/backup/peru/hourly.0/ <bunch of lines deleted> wrote 873039

Hi! I've set up a Samba server (running winbind) as a Win domain member server. Users authenticated from win domain and mapped to NIS uids and gids. Everything was working well, but the next morning winbind stopped to respond. I reset it, so now I get wbinfo, ypbind (ypcat) results ok as before, but users suddenly cannot authenticate any more. My <client>.log files are empty,

Dear all, Maybe somebody can help me to understand my problem: Inside a R script, I try to export the graphic results of 'bwplot' in some jpeg files. The data source ('main') is a mix of numeric and factor values the "analysis_bwplot()" contains the loops (i and j) and calls the "analysis_var_var_bwplot()" method. "analysis_var_var_bwplot()" uses

Hello, I submitted a draft proposal at the gsoc website. You can see the application in the attached pdf. Any feedback is welcome. thanks, Anastasis -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: GSoC2018_llvm_application.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 41454 bytes Desc: not available URL:

Hello, My proposal for GSoC 2018 [attachment] about improving debugging of optimized code was accepted. I will work with my mentor Vedant Kumar (vsk) through the summer to find where DI loss occurs and try to fix as many occurrences as possible. I will also be keeping a devlog here: https://gramanas.github.io/ You can check what the first steps of my project are on the latest post:

Thanks Anastasis. This proposal looks good to me, this is great work. @all, here is a link to the project description: https://llvm.org/OpenProjects.html#llvm_optimized_debugging Davide (CC'd) and I will be available as mentors. I'd be happy to help answer any questions/concerns about this project. vedant > On Mar 16, 2018, at 11:07 AM, Anast Gramm <anastasis.gramm2 at

Welcome Anastasis! I'm very happy to see this work going forward. I see that your first task is to make "debugify" into a function pass, so we will be able to get data on a per-pass basis. At EuroLLVM there was a relevant lightning talk about a different tool, see: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-04/talks.html#Lightning_11 It will be extremely interesting to see how well your results

Hello, > On Apr 26, 2018, at 6:44 AM, Son Tuan VU <sontuan.vu119 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Vedant, > > I have tried to implement the fix you proposed, but it didn't work as expected. I created a new Module Pass Manager (not Function Pass Manager) and override the add() method like this: > > class DebugifyEachPassManager : public legacy::PassManager { >

FWIW, I've raised the LICM issue here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37682 On 31 May 2018 at 13:28, Anast Gramm <anastasis.gramm2 at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks, > These are very helpful. > > As I understand it, SROA and LICM render some variables > "useless" by optimizing the code to not use them. Hence we can't debug > them. > >

Hello, @Anastasis: what do you think about this? Do you mind if I implement the debugify-each mode and refactor the code to have DebugifyFunctionPass and DebugifyLoopPass? I am sorry if it bothers you, I should have done this earlier, so you could focus on fixing the optimization passes. FYI, my debugify-each is quite ready, I am having Debugify and CheckDebugify before and after each ModulePass,

Hi list, I have a strange permission problem with secrets.tdb on an nfs mounted filesystem. A strace of smbd shows the following lines: ######################################################################## open("/etc/samba/private/secrets.tdb", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_LARGEFILE, 0600) = 4 fcntl64(4, F_SETLKW64, {type=F_WRLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=0, len=1}, 0xbffff010) = -1 EACCES

Dear everybody! Please find attached a tiny R-program. It returns: [,1] [,2] [1,] 53.55 NA [2,] 53.55 NA [3,] 53.55 NA How can I manage the first column to show the second component not only of the first list in k??ste but of the second component of every list in k??ste respectively, such as to get the following array returned: [,1] [,2] [1,] 53.55 NA [2,] 53.87 NA [3,] 53.87

Mhm I see now, thanks for your explanation! Son Tuan Vu On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 10:58 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 16, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Son Tuan VU <sontuan.vu119 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Vedant, > > Thank you for your reply. I think I can make this debugify-each mode, but > I guess this is reserved for your GSoC project ? > >

Hi Vedant, I have tried to implement the fix you proposed, but it didn't work as expected. I created a new *Module* Pass Manager (not Function Pass Manager) and override the *add()* method like this: class DebugifyEachPassManager : public legacy::PassManager { public: void add(Pass *P) override { PassManager::add(createDebugifyPass()); PassManager::add(P);

Hi Anastasis, Welcome, and congratulations! It's great to see that you're maintaining a devlog and have hit the ground running. I'm looking forward to working with you. > On Apr 25, 2018, at 12:56 PM, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Welcome Anastasis! I'm very happy to see this work going forward. > > I see that your first task is to

Hi Vedant, hi all, My goal is to measure debug info loss of *each* optimization pass in LLVM. I am trying to create a debugify-each mode in opt, inspired by verify-each mode which is supposed to already work. However, if I understand correctly, the verify-each mode (triggered by -verify-each option in opt) only works when we provide a pass list or a pass pipeline. Is this intended? I mean, why

Hi Vedant, Thank you for your reply. I think I can make this debugify-each mode, but I guess this is reserved for your GSoC project ? However, if I understand correctly, we do not want to take the output of the first check-debugify (I mean the .ll file with potentially all the WARNINGs and ERRORs after the first pass) as input for the second debugify. What we need is to take the fresh output of

Hello, I'm an undergraduate student in the CS department of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTh). Last year I successfully completed GSoC with Mixxx [1] and this year I would like to work on LLVM. I am interested in "Improving debugging of optimized code" [2]. I have gone through the kaleidoscope tutorial and I've set up a basic dev environment for LLVM and clang.