Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "ext3-0.0.5b test release is available"
2001 Jan 05
1
Announcing ext3-0.0.5e
Hi all,
OK, here is ext3-0.0.5e. Changes since 5d are summarised below. The
major changes are the barrier support: this infrastructure should be
sufficient to allow the snapshotting interface which LVM is wanting
for ext3. The journal initialisation fix will also help people adding
ext3 to an existing filesystem. Look for ext3-0.0.5e.tar.gz on:
2000 Dec 08
2
ext3-0.0.5c released
Hi all,
ext3-0.0.5c is now up at:
ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/
and ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/
The most important part of this release is the e2fsprogs: e2fsck now
supports the journal changes for metadata-only journaling.
Ted, I've changed around the use of jfs* include files in e2fsprogs
quite heavily here. In each build directory --- the lib/ext2fs
2001 Feb 13
2
ext3-0.0.6a available
Hi,
ext3-0.0.6a has been uploaded to
ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/ext3-0.0.6a.tar.gz
and
ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/ext3-0.0.6a.tar.gz
This version changes the way dirty buffers are marked to protect
against device drivers which might block in the ll_rw_block()
function. (Loop and lvm are examples.) It should also fix a rare but
persistent report of
2001 May 17
0
Fwd: ext3 for 2.4
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: ext3 for 2.4
Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 21:20:38 +1000
From: Andrew Morton <andrewm@uow.edu.au>
To: ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Peter J. Braam"
<braam@mountainviewdata.com>, Andreas Dilger <adilger@turbolinux.com>,
"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Summary:
2001 Jul 26
5
ext3-2.4-0.9.4
An update to the ext3 filesystem for 2.4 kernels is available at
http://www.uow.edu.au/~andrewm/linux/ext3/
The diffs are against linux-2.4.7 and linux-2.4.6-ac5.
The changelog is there. One rarely-occurring but oopsable bug
was fixed and several quite significant performance enhancements
have been made. These are in addition to the performance fixes
which went into 0.9.3.
Ted has put out a
2001 Jun 06
1
ext3-0.0.7a for 2.2.19 is released
Hi all,
ext3-0.0.7a is now out, at the usual places:
ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/
and propagating now from
ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/
This fixes one major bug in ext3 recovery for metadata-only
journaling. Because recovery can also happen in e2fsck, users should
also upgrade to at least e2fsprogs-1.21-WIP-0601 (also provided at the
above ftp sites).
2004 Jul 14
3
ext3 performance with hardware RAID5
I'm setting up a new fileserver. It has two RAID controllers, a PERC 3/DI
providing mirrored system disks and a PERC 3/DC providing a 1TB RAID5 volume
consisting of eight 144GB U160 drives. This will serve NFS, Samba and sftp
clients for about 200 users.
The logical drive was created with the following settings:
RAID = 5
stripe size = 32kb
write policy = wrback
read policy =
2000 Dec 04
1
some ext3 benchmarks
Howdy,
Some ext2/3 benchmarks on a IBM-DPTA-372050 connected to k7 650MHz. The same
partition was used on all tests roughly with the same disk usage.
bonnie on ext2:
-------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
-Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU
2008 Feb 14
2
btrfs v0.11 & btrfs v0.12 benchmark results
Hi,
I've recently benchmarked btrfs v0.11 & v0.12 against ext2, ext3, ext4,
jfs, reiserfs and xfs.
OS: Ubuntu Hardy
Kernel: 2.6.24(-5-server)
Hardware:
---------
Fu-Si Primergy RX330 S1
* AMD Opteron 2210 1.8 GHz
* 1 GB RAM
* 3 x 73 GB, 3Gb/s, hot plug, 10k rpm, 3.5" SAS HDD
* LSI RAID 128 MB
Fu-Si Econel 200
* Intel Xeon 5110
* 512 MB RAM
2002 Jan 07
0
look for atomicity problem using ext3 through NFS
Hi,
I'm looking for some experience regarding using ext3 journaled, ordered
or writeback modes
through NFS.
I wonder what is the best ext3 mode to use with NFS: journaled, ordered
or writeback ? And what is provided for
atomicity and ordering of write requested through a NFS client with
these 3 modes ?
As there is some NFS caching and segmentation policies, that are done
independently of
2003 Mar 14
1
Updated ext3 patch set for 2.4
Hi all,
I've pushed my current set of ext3 diffs (against Marcelo's current
tree) to
http://people.redhat.com/sct/patches/ext3-2.4/dev-20030314/
This includes:
00-merged/ diffs recently merged into 2.4
10-core-fixes-other/ misc fixes/tweaks from akpm, adilger
11-core-fixes-sct/ misc fixes/tweaks from sct
20-tytso-updates/ Ted's recent updates
21-updates-sct/ recent sct diffs
2001 Feb 23
1
ext3-0.0.6b available
Hi all,
ext3-0.0.6b is now available at the usual places:
ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/
and
ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/
The only significant change in this release is the fix to the orphan
list recovery, and that fix also affects e2fsprogs, so please pick up
the new e2fsprogs from the same directory when you grab the ext3
release. I've put tarballs,
2000 Dec 14
2
ext3-0.0.5d released
Hi,
ext3-0.0.5d.tar.gz is now up on
ftp.uk.linux.org:/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/
and ftp.*.kernel.org:/pub/linux/kernel/people/sct/ext3/
as patches against 2.2.18.
This only contains the kernel bits: we're in the process of syncing up
on some e2fsprogs so I'll do another release shortly once we've got
all of the pending changes for the user-mode tools assembled.
This release is mostly
2001 Jun 14
1
Re: EXT2 - EXT3 - Reiserfs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 14 June 2001 13:05, Rick Sivernell babbled:
> Doug
>
> Educate me please. What is the diff between ext2 & 3. I am using reiserfs
> now and do like it. But I do like to have the stuff going, if I can.
Be warned, I know nothing about reiserfs other than what I've read.
short version:
ext3 is a further development of
2004 Feb 13
1
fsync in ext3: A question
Hi,
I have a question on fsync() and ext3's journaling modes.
Assume that I call fsync(fd) on a file.
If that file is in 'data=journal' mode, would the fsync() return once the
data gets safely into the journal ?
On the other hand, if that file is in 'data=writeback' mode, would the
fsync() return only when the data gets safely into its actual location ?
Any help is
2001 Jul 30
1
ext3-0.9.5-247/2.4.8-pre3/PPC Oops bits
Okay, after playing around a bit more, I'm getting two oopes in a row
when running dbench 16 or dbench 32. Decoded, here they are:
Assertion failure in unmap_underlying_metadata() at buffer.c:1530: "!buffer_jlist_eq(old_bh, 3)"
kernel BUG at buffer.c:1530!
Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4
NIP: C003BB34 XER: 00000000 LR: C003BB34 SP: CF881E00 REGS: cf881d50 TRAP: 0700
Using
2002 May 16
2
Ext3-0.9.18 available
Hi,
ext3-0.9.18 is now available for 2.4.19-pre8. Some of the fixes in
this release are already in the 2.4.19-pre8, but there are some
important new fixes in the patch and users are encouraged to upgrade.
This release fixes all known outstanding bug reports.
The full patch against linux-2.4.19-pre8, and a tarball of the
individual fixes in this patch set, is now propagating to
2001 Jul 30
0
Documentation/filesystems/ext2.txt and ext3 for 2.4
Hi. While reading Documentation/filesystems/ext2.txt I
noticed that the information about ext3 is outdated:
The ext3 code is currently (Apr 2001) available for 2.2 kernels only,
and not yet available for 2.4 kernels.
Journaling (ext3) ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/sct/fs/jfs/
The file was touched when I applied the 2.4.7 patch from
Linus, so I suspect it's maintained.
--
2001 Sep 12
3
Distinct transactions (MV vs rename())?
I have a question regarding a thread in June called "Distinct
transactions", which I have included below. It seems to me that the
solution is not atomic for daemons opening the file as there is a moment
where the filename is not in the directory (i.e. unlink then link).
In summary, poster Charlie Woloszynski wanted to update a configuration
file in a safe manner (i.e. as a
2001 May 09
4
Ext3 destroying ownerships and permissions
Hi!
A few weeks ago we upgraded 9 large webservers from ext2 to ext3. Since then we've seen very strange behavior on several of the machines. Permissions of files are repeatedly changed at random occasions. Several times, ownership of files have been totally mangled. Several users have logged in to discover that all their files suddenly are owned by another user! At two of these occasions