similar to: throughput of 300MB/s

Hello, I'm trying to export Samba shares that access a PVFS2 (http://www.pvfs.org/pvfs2)-mounted partition. PVFS2 is a parallel, distributed file system for Linux clusters. PVFS2 gets mounted like any other partition and it offers non-POSIX file semantics similar to NFS. We can use standard shell commands (mv, ls, cp, etc.) to read and write files on the PVFS2 file system without any

Use NEVR when querying RPM for the list of files of a package, instead of ENVR. Also, use the epoch only when non-zero, and version of RPM supports it. The approach is basically copied from what supermin does in its RPM package handler. --- v2v/linux.ml | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/v2v/linux.ml

Use NEVR when querying RPM for the list of files of a package, instead of ENVR. Also, use the epoch only when non-zero, and version of RPM supports it. The approach is basically copied from what supermin does in its RPM package handler. --- v2v/linux.ml | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/v2v/linux.ml

Use NEVR when querying RPM for the list of files of a package, instead of ENVR. Also, use the epoch only when non-zero, and version of RPM supports it. The approach is basically copied from what supermin does in its RPM package handler. --- v2v/linux.ml | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/v2v/linux.ml

I came across this www.gluster.org Has any one tried it . Is it a true parallel file system allowing concurrent read and write to a file by many processes. Will it be suitable for HPC applications. -- Regards-- Rishi Pathak -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, On a machine with CentOS-5.6, I need libvorbis >= 1.2, so I have recompiled and packaged libvorbis. But I get the following error : $ rpm -U /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/libvorbis-1.2.3-phn.1.x86_64.rpm /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/libvorbis-devel-1.2.3-phn.1.x86_64.rpm package libvorbis-1.1.2-3.el5_4.4.x86_64 (which is newer than libvorbis-1.2.3-phn.1.x86_64) is already

Le Fri, 11 Aug 2017 11:55:03 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> écrivait: > If you are going to upgrade, you might as well go for the highest > version you can, this will probably mean using Louis's packages. > > Samba is a rapidly changing program, a new minor version is released > every 6 months (approx) and the changes are significant. > >

Hi, I am after a feel of the throughput capabilities for TC and Iptables in comparison to dedicated hardware. I have heard talk about 1Gb+ throughput with minimal performance impact using 50ish TC rules and 100+ Iptables rules. Is there anyone here running large throughput / large configurations, and if so, what sort of figures? Regards Dan

Do you MC support? Cheers, Rafael On Feb 9, 2016 1:12 PM, "Jacques Pienaar via llvm-dev" < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> > wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 9:58 AM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev < >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >>>

On 20/06/20 3:50 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > Your dates are significantly off > Wikipedia has a delay listed in a table: > > It is, for CentOS-7, For example: > > 7.0 27 > 7.1 26 > 7.2 25 > 7.3 39 > 7.4 43 > 7.5 31 > 7.6 34 > 7.7 42 > 7.8 28 > > > For 6 .. since 6.2, it has bee3n between 10 and 18 days. > > For 8: > > 8.0

Hello, I have trouble with using data.frame data. 1. I loaded data using the following: ff &lt;- read.table("E:/R/VM/matrix.txt", header=T) The data I used is attached. I want to use at least 2 conditions for selecting of data. But I failed. It works. -&gt; fff &lt;- ff[ff$HG == "GUEST",] ffff &lt;- fff[fff$WR == "READ",] But it

What is the meaning of the "4:", "2:", "30:" and "1:" prefixes for the following entries in yum.log? Most entries in yum.log don't have them. grep "Installed: [0-9]*:" /var/log/yum.log May 07 16:45:53 Installed: 4:perl-5.8.8-27.el5.i386 May 07 16:58:21 Installed: 2:xinetd-2.3.14-10.el5.i386 May 07 17:03:43 Installed:

Hi list, I have this problem of (relatively) poor samba read performance. Read performance is constantly, reproducibly lower than write performance and I can't really understand why. Here is the server configuration : dual octocore Opteron 6128, 32 GB RAM Adaptec 6445 RAID card 36x 2TB Hitachi SATA drives (raid 60) Sustained local disk throughput: over 850 MB/s write, over 1.4 GB/s read.

I went to the site to subscribe again and ended up watching some of Jeremy's Google interviews. I particularly enjoyed the interview with James and the bow tie lesson at the end. :) So anyway, I recently upgraded my home network to end-to-end GbE. My clients are Windows XP SP3 w/hot fixes, and my Samba server is 3.5.6 atop vanilla kernel.org Linux 3.2.6 and Debian 6.0.6. With FDX fast

Hi all, I curently have a big problem. One request (listed above) using context take up to 1000 more time than the on RAW or ext2 database. I have ran this request on a single IA32 machine with Redhat and dbf on ext2. The average reponse time is less than a sec. The same request on RAC 4 nodes cluster on RAW take the same average time. On ext2 idem. But on OCFS it took up to 15 sec randomly

Hi all, I curently have a big problem. One request (listed above) using context take up to 1000 more time than the on RAW or ext2 database. I have ran this request on a single IA32 machine with Redhat and dbf on ext2. The average reponse time is less than a sec. The same request on RAC 4 nodes cluster on RAW take the same average time. On ext2 idem. But on OCFS it took up to 15 sec randomly

Hi all, I have problem reaching 1Gbps network speed with dom0 / domU (paravirtualized) on my centos5 installations. The fastest speed I measured in domU was about 800/600 receive/transmit Mbps, dom0 being a bit slower. I'm using bridging (eeither with default xen/centos network-bridge script or with my own scripts assigning vlans to bridges). Is anyone experiencing same network slowdown? Or

Hi, I have a typical configuration for my firewall/gateway box: single network card, with a pppoe connection to the DSL modem. I''m already successfully shaping the uplink (how come that the wondershaper.htb doesn''t use the ceil parameter? It should implement bandwidth borrowing!) but i found the ingress policy a little bit rough. I''d like to keep the traffic categories

When detecting kernels we have to list the files in the package to find the right /boot/vmlinuz file. In virt-v2v 1.28 we ran: rpm -ql kernel Because multiple kernels can be installed this gave incorrect results, which was reported in RHBZ#1161250 and initially fixed in commit 377bc302f11db3da4263f894c76a7d280fb25dbd. This changed the command to: rpm -ql [epoch:]kernel-version.release

hi, we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to create one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to create it in a redundant way ie: - if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the whole filesystem still usable and consistent. - any server in this farm can see the same storage/filesystem. it's someting a big network raid5-6... storage where