similar to: Slow access when opening shares

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Slow access when opening shares"

2012 Jul 16
2
Suspicious activity on domain
Hello, Last week I have detected with Zabbix that a member of my Samba domain had been downloading at a rate of around 8 Mbps for two days and a half. When asking the person to whom belonged the machine, he didn't know he was downloading anything but he said he had observed his machine had slowed down since then. I took a tcpdump of the traffic before terminating his session on Windows
2010 Jul 19
3
ActiveRecord override
Would really appreciate it if someone could tell me why this is happening: I override ssn method of AR class so I can encrypt/decrypt to/from the db: class Person < ActiveRecord::Base def ssn=(value) write_attribute(:borrower_ssn, Crypto.encrypt(self.encryption_key, value)) write_attribute(:borrower_ssn_final_four, value[5,4]) end def ssn # this begin - rescue can be
2005 Apr 30
5
SPT vs. DPT Sanity Check (Samba rules)
Before wasting a lot of time going at this in the wrong list, I would like to confirm whether my thinking is on or off base with respect to source and destination ports. Samba is being blocked by fw2loc even though I have accept rules set up. I believe I can explain why, but I could be wrong. I think that for some reason, samba is sourcing stuff on the commonly used port 137, but trying to send
2003 Sep 18
1
Use Samba on an other port than 137-139?
Hello, I would like to ask you if its possible to run Samba on an other port than 137-139? I tried once to edit the "/etc/services" File. The lines: ... netbios-ns 137/tcp netbios-ns 137/udp netbios-dgm 138/tcp netbios-dgm 138/udp netbios-ssn 139/tcp netbios-ssn 139/udp ... I changed it to: ... netbios-ns 6998/tcp netbios-ns 6998/udp netbios-dgm 6999/tcp netbios-dgm 6999/udp
2003 Dec 16
3
Results of nessus scan
I run samba 2.2.8a on my openbsd 3.4 box, installed from a package. All i need is the ability to mount disks form winxp boxes so i only run smbd, at 139/tcp. I tried scanning the box with nessus, and it came up with some results that got me curious. Since i dont know very much about the smb protocol I thought i should ask here. Have searched the archives but found only old posts, concering
2006 May 16
5
rake aborted when adding a column
I''m having a silly little problem with migrations.  All I''m trying to do is to add an SSN column to my Employees table.  I generated a migration which looks like: class AddSsn &lt; ActiveRecord::Migration def self.up     add_column :employees, :ssn, :string end def self.down     remove_column :employees, :ssn   end end When I run this, however, I get: &gt;rake
1998 Feb 25
1
netbios-ssn/tcp: unknown service
Sorry if this is such a basic question but I couldn't find anything about this in the FAQs/HowTos/Digest. I've compiled samba-1.9.18p3 on SunOS4.1.3_U1. When I tried to run smbd via inetd.conf (SIGHUP), I always get the following on the console. inetd[590]: netbios-ssn/tcp: unknown service I've edited the /etc/services to add: netbios-ssn 139/tcp And the /etc/inetd/conf with
2007 May 29
2
Problems with Windows 2003 connecting a Samba server
Hi list, I am encountering a problem in connecting a Windows 2003 to a Samba 3.0.21b server. The Samba server is configured to have a security = share option, so that no password is needed. I can connect to the server by typing "net use z: \\192.168.51.1\data", and it is successful. However, if I try to do "dir z:", no file found! Same behaviour are found in Windows
2024 Jun 15
2
code for year month day hr format
Thank you Rui. I ran the following script df1 <- read.table("solar_hour", header = TRUE) df1$date <- as.Date(paste(df1$year, df1$hour), format = "%Y %j", origin = "2012-08-01-0") df2 <- df1[c("date", "IMF", "SWS", "SSN", "Dst", "f10")] head(df1) #To display all the rows print(df2). It gave me this
2024 Jun 15
1
code for year month day hr format
?s 20:00 de 15/06/2024, Jibrin Alhassan escreveu: > I have solar-geophysical data e.g as blow: > YEAR DOY HR IMF SW SSN Dst f10.7 > 2012 214 0 3.4 403. 132 -9 154.6 > 2012 214 1 3.7 388. 132 -10 154.6 > 2012 214 2 3.7 383. 132 -10 154.6 > 2012 214 3 3.7 391. 132 -9 154.6 > 2012 214 4 4.2 399. 132 -7 154.6 > 2012 214 5 4.1 411.
1998 Jul 20
2
Multiple interfaces
I have tried to set up Samba on my Solaris 2.5.1 with 2 interfaces (le0, le0:1 - one network card with two IP addresses). But all I could see is throught the default ports 137 and 139. In my /etc/inetd.conf, I have: netbios-ns dgram udp wait root /opt/samba/bin/nmbd nmbd -s/opt/samba/lib/kes.smb.conf netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /opt/samba/bin/smbd smbd -s/opt/samba/lib/kes.smb.conf
2001 Mar 29
3
INETD Question.
I'm currently running version 2.0.7 of samba(CIFS9000). I have HPUX 11.x installed on the samba server. When I try to run this from inetd it doesn't work. I can run a startup script that runs the smbd as a daemon and it works fine. But if I try to run it from inetd it won't start. The previous version of Samba 1.9.18p10 that I had on this server worked fine. Is this a bug in
2024 Jun 15
2
code for year month day hr format
I have solar-geophysical data e.g as blow: YEAR DOY HR IMF SW SSN Dst f10.7 2012 214 0 3.4 403. 132 -9 154.6 2012 214 1 3.7 388. 132 -10 154.6 2012 214 2 3.7 383. 132 -10 154.6 2012 214 3 3.7 391. 132 -9 154.6 2012 214 4 4.2 399. 132 -7 154.6 2012 214 5 4.1 411. 132 -6 154.6 2012 214 6 4.0 407. 132 -6 154.6 2012 214 7 4.2 404. 132 -4
2006 Jan 31
1
Slow Samba when added new hard drive
Hi, I've used Samba several years without any problems. Last week I added a new disk to my system, and Samba started to behave very strange. It's slow in terms of establish a connection and time to list directories. I've tried to resolve the problem without success. No other daemon has problems, both ftp and http works fine as well as internal communication. Below I've attached
2015 Aug 06
5
Netbios
Hi team, one small query, Is netbios-ns,netbios-dgm and netbios-ssn ports 137,138,139 need to be open to communicate with windows from linux. what was the use of these services??
2001 Nov 07
1
xinetd, what's the trick?
Hello, I've succefuly installed samba 2.2.2 on my Linux box. I can share between Linux and MS boxes, but I want to start samba from xinetd. In /etc/xinetd.d/ I have this: #/etc/xinetd.d/netbios-ns service netbios-ns { disable = no socket_type = dgram protocol = udp port = 137 user = root wait
2004 Jan 04
1
XP can browse samba by IP, but not by name - NMB issues?
I have an XP home (falcon) and an XP pro (tatooine) machine, both behind a rh9 box (hoth) acting as firewall. I've been trying to get samba set up on the linux box. I think I have it mostly working except that the XP boxes won't list hoth under "My Network Places - Microsoft Windows Network - MSHOME", and I cannot access hoth by name at all from the XP-pro box (by IP, I can
2002 Oct 14
1
samba server does not appear in network neighborhood
Hi all, I've recently setup samba 2.2.5 on a solaris 8 workstation and configured it to be a member of an NT domain. Everything is working correctly, with the exception that the samba server does not appear in the network neighborhood of the rest of the PC's in the domain. However, if you choose to "search for computers" and enter the netbios name of the server it is
2004 Jun 15
1
listenning on interfaces
Hello, I am new to samba and i would to well secure it. In smb.conf, I entered the following lines : hosts allow = 192.168.0.2 127.0.0.1 hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0 bind interfaces only = yes interfaces = eth0 lo I thought that it would only listens on the local machine and my internal Lan (which is on eth0 192.168.0.1) but nmbd seems to always listen on UDP/137 and UDP/138 (netbios-ns and
1999 Jan 15
1
Oplock question
Hi! Been having the same problem with oplocks for a while and have been trying to figure out what's going wrong. The FAQ says that we may have a networking (hardware?) problem, but according to the Linux box's ifconfig results, we have had no errors and no dropped packets on the internal network. I am able to reproduce the error pretty much at will on our network, and it is not isolated