similar to: Only BUILTIN accounts working on 2k3 AD

Dear R users, This is a problem that has puzzled me for quite some time, and I wonder if anyone could offer me an insight to what is happening? I generated a multinomial matrix by using A<-rmultinom(100,1,c(0.4,0.3,0.2,0.1), and multiply this matrix by a set of values say B<-runif(n,100,50). I then calculate var(colSums(A*B)). I was able to work out the theoretical mean of

Hi, Please forgive me if my searching-fu has failed me in this case, but I''ve been unable to find any information on how people are going about monitoring and alerting regarding memory usage on Solaris hosts using ZFS. The problem is not that the ZFS ARC is using up the memory, but that the script Nagios is using to check memory usage simply sees, say 96% RAM used, and alerts. The

Hi all, I've got a Debian Lenny Samba server on which I'm trying to define UID ranges for the handful of domains it connects to. I'm using the RID backend successfully for the domains: I can switch to it successfully from the old self defined UID's, and then getent passwd/group show the new expected ones. However, the BUILTIN accounts also seen getent passwd don't

So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. The CentOS wiki page discusses retrieving the kernel source[2], but doesn't describe how to apply patches. Instructions I've found apply to CentOS5, and RH has changed their kernel packaging since then. I've been banging my head on this off and on

Hi, I need to download an image, and I''ve mucked about with Net::HTTP resp = Net::HTTP.get_response(''www.mydomain.com'', ''/test.jpg'') f = File.new("test.jpg","w") f.write(response.body) And various other combinations using HTTP.get etc. Anyway, I get an image, but it looks very psychedelic. This is obviously not the correct way.

I?m doing a new dovecot mail server for my domain. Here?s yet another thing I mucked up. I wanted to set up virtual mailboxes. One reason was that I wanted to set up virtual users for the domain so I don?t need to create user accounts just mail accounts. I followed one of the many examples / tutorials out there and I end up with the following warning message. postfix/trivial-rewrite[8818]:

Not sure if anyone will find this useful, but this is how I deleted a bunch (several hundred) of empty mail folders from a user account: # doveadm mailbox status -u ?user at example.com" messages "*" ALL | grep "=0" | awk -F= '{print $1}' | awk '{print "rm -rf ."$1}' > list then I looked over list just to be sure it wasn?t mucked up and in

OK, found out the problem as to why it doesn't boot any kernel except 36.2 the system reports that it cannot find vmlinuz-3.10.0-1160.88.1.el7.x86_64 or any one of the others, except for vmlinuz-3.10.0-1160.36.2.el7.x86_64 hence a manual selection from the grub menu when in front of the machine will only load the 36.2 kernel I found that under /boot/grub2 there were two .rpmnew files

I spent the last couple of days getting my sea legs with Rails and RSpec. I''d been waiting til things seemed calmer before jumping in, and I''m overall very happy with my experience so far. My only real annoyance so far has been forgetting to call "do_post" or "do_create" from my specify blocks. My mocks don''t get the calls they want, and it usually

I was reading here and there about the differences between Merb and Rails [1] and became curious about statements such as this: > It is threadsafe with configurable Mutex Locks (Routing is also > threadsafe) Having mucked with the routes system, I had this awful feeling that I don''t understand threading well enough to know if my contribution is "thread safe".

Hi hpa and others. With my ongoing work to prepare for potential integration of klibc in the kernel I wonder if there wold be any interest in using part of the kbuild infrastructure to build the vanilla klibc? The rationale is obvious: - common codebase for Kbuild files, so one only has to fix things in one place - I force klibc developers to create Kbuild files usable in the kernel - Much

>> As per the release notes, it should work unless you say "--without-ldb- >> lmdb". The message just got mucked up. The "configure" stage actually failed. How can it be a message problem only?

Dear R I recently asked for a cluster analysis Using * cluster.results <- hclust(iris.dist, method="complete") * but nothing happened i.e the previous scatterplot matrix still showed up whereas I was expecting a dendogram. Could it be that because I had used cutree before on the scatter plots that it somehow mucked it up. I tried detach then attach and commenced making the data

This is my first post so hopefully I haven't mucked up the rules. I'm trying to change the default borders in either boxplot or barplot so that, at the request of a journal, all of my figures have the same type of border. I've successfully used par(bty="o") using plot(1:10, bty="o"), but it seems that barplot and boxplot have their own defaults that override

I am running a small server with a fixed number of users. Postfix is using dovecot lda so that I can run pigeonhole. I have setup a user file with the ids and passwords and everything authenticates properly. Postfix uses that also. However, mail is consistently delivered to user at domain. How do I tell it to deliver to just user? I have tried setting a variety of different things like:

Suppose that (e.g.) xyplot() returns an object "xxx" with (say) 3 pages. I would like to extract/plot (print) just one of these pages, e.g. page 2. Here's a toy example: x <- rep(seq(0,1,length=11),12) set.seed(42) y <- rnorm(3*44) a <- rep(letters[1:12],each=11) dta <- data.frame(x=x,y=y,a=a) xxx <- xyplot(y~x|a,data=dta,layout=c(2,2)) I would to extract from

Folks - With Dovecot 1.0.7, we're seemingly unable to authenticate users for out-going SMTP access who are not residing directly within the main system passwd/shadow files. (I.e. the users seeded within our non-system "dovecot" userdbs & passwd files have no "smtp-auth" joy! (Ye olde "Relaying denied. Proper authentication required") I've mucked around

Hello, I have to set up a domain trust between a samba 3.0.25 server and a windows 2k3 server. I already had a close look at the corresponding chapter http://us3.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/NetCommand.html#id365312 but this chapter doesn't mention windows 2k3 server. My question is, whether I can use this chapter for a 2k3 server, too? Or are there any major

I am currently running an openSuSE 10.2 machine in a Windows 2k3 domain. I have upgraded to Samba 3.0.26a, hoping it would solve my issue, but so far no luck. I was successful in adding my machine to the domain, and the DC logs show repeated successful authentications, and those few typo'd attempts, but nothing that is a sequence of failed logins. I get tickets and can access shares from

I'm trying to run 2 SMB servers on my intranet (which also has a Win98 client). Both are accessable if I explicitly link to them. (ie: "NET USE" commands work just fine), but neither apear on a browse list if both of them are running. If only 1 is running, it appears just fine. I've mucked around with the "domain master" & "local master" parameters,