similar to: Samba 3.0.6 Available for Download

Can anybody answer me?! Thanks in advance!!! I have patch 3.0.6 with all patchs in http://samba.org/~jerry/patches/post-3.0.6/ , and set null passwords = yes in smb.conf. It works well to mount samba share in linux box when user alpha have non-empty password. But when set alpha's passwork as NULL, I get the follow messages: # mount -t smbfs -o username=alpha,password=""

I recently installed and built 3.0.06 on my Solaris 9 Ultra 5 station. When I start either smbd or nmbd, the log files indicate a missing shared library during initialization, but the daemons appear to be running anyway. Specifically, the log says: [2004/09/09 09:09:07, 3] lib/module.c:do_smb_load_module(46) Error loading module '/usr/local/samba/lib/charset/ISO8859-1.so': ld.so.1:

http://www1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/3.0/shorewall-3.0.6/ ftp://ftp1.shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/3.0/shorewall-3.0.6/ Coming soon to a Mirror near you. Problems corrected in 3.0.6 1) A typo in the output of "help drop" has been corrected. 2) Previously, ''shorewall start'' would fail in the presence of a network interface named ''inet''. 3)

Hello. I recompiled from the samba.org 3.0.7 SRPMs and it worked like a charm. I think the problem may have been that I was using RHEL3's 3.0.6 samba RPMs which depended on their own krb5-libs, and I used kerberos rpms that don't use e2fsprogs's libcom_err. Anyone privilaged enough to be using RHEL3 to integrate their linux machines into ADS may want to rebuild anything depending on

The 3.1 manual says in the description of --human-readable: Backward compatibility note: versions of rsync prior to 3.1.0 do not support human-readable level 1, and they default to level 0. Thus, specifying one or two -h options behaves the same in old and new versions as long as you didn?t specify a --no-h option prior to one or more -h options.

In my application.rb, I have this: #require "rails/all" require "action_controller/railtie" require "action_mailer/railtie" require "active_resource/railtie" require "active_model/railtie" (I didn''t want ActiveRecord) This worked fine up to 3.0.6, but now fails with: /Users/jeffdeville/Documents/code/ruby/wg/config/application.rb:6:in

I recently converted my Samba PDC from ldapsam to tdbsam as I was having too many problems with the ldap backend failing after a power outages. I now have a few questions regarding tdbsam: 1. Is there any GUI user administration tool that I can use in conjunction with a tdbsam backend? Usrmgr seems to function as user root on the domain, but does not seem very reliable. I'm looking for

Hi, we have started getting "file exists" ~100s errors every day. I think we never got it with rsync 2.6.9. Is there anything changed in new version that has been generating these errors? Error while syncing /usr/local/theapp/: rsync: symlink "/usr/local/theapp/2009.uv" -> "../thedt.uv" failed: File exists (17) ... Error while syncing /usr/local/theapp/: rsync

Got this strange error: receiving incremental file list rsync: opendir "/.~tmp~" (in <sender-module>) failed: Permission denied (13) IO error encountered -- skipping file deletion rsync: opendir "/path/.~tmp~" (in <sender-module>) failed: Permission denied (13) invalid multi-message 22:4 [sender/inc] *************************************** rsync: connection

Got this in the log: WARNING: path/file failed verification -- update discarded (will try again). rsync: read errors mapping "/path/file": No data available (61) The first line is rare but understandable. It's the second one that I find strange. What does "no data available" mean? The file exists on the origin (and on the destination). The second attempt should have

Hello, I have few Windows2000 Pro samba domain members which logon to the domain without any obstacles. Recently I decided to upgrade all client workstations to WindowsXP SP2. Fresh copy of WindowsXP joined domain properly but when I tried to logon as usual it accepted password and shut down after a while (logs of samba confirm that workstation logged on). Windows claims that winlogon caused

Hi All. Trying to use the file /samba-3.0.6/examples/LDAP/samba.schema I found that it has duplicate entries for atributetype > grep 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165.2.1.50 /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/* /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema.new:attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165 .2.1.50 NAME 'sambaLogonHours' /usr/local/etc/openldap/schema/samba.schema.new:attributetype ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.7165

Hello all, I have a quick question. the backup software, EXEC 10, does not change the archive bits on Samba share. so when we ran our Full back up it was fine and it was suppose to change the archive bits then when we ran our *incremental back it ran a full back because the archive bits didn't change.* Have anybody run into the same issues. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

Hi all, Situation : New server RH9, Samba 3.0.6, Kerberos5 1.2.7 in active directory domain was working in 2000 but now (win2k3). Problem is I need to either update kerberos to 1.3.x to get this working or install Fedora 2. Unfortunately I have a controller card which isn't currently supported in fedora. Other option is updating Kerberos in RH9 and all the problems this brings.

I have released rsync 3.0.6. This is another bug-fix release. To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.5, visit this link: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.6-NEWS You can download the source tar file and its signature from here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.6.tar.gz http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.6.tar.gz.asc The patches directory

I have released rsync 3.0.6. This is another bug-fix release. To see a full summary of the changes since 3.0.5, visit this link: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.6-NEWS You can download the source tar file and its signature from here: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.6.tar.gz http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src/rsync-3.0.6.tar.gz.asc The patches directory

Hello, I'm trying to run Nagios 3.0.6 on CentOS 5.2 with SELinux in enforcing mode but it is not working. I'm using the following packages: httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_2.centos.4 nagios-3.0.6-1.el5.rf nagios-plugins-1.4.12-1.el5.rf I followed the steps bellow to try to create a selinux policy to Nagios but it is failing. Any help, please? # setenforce Permissive # service nagios start #

Hello, I use procedures for backup with rsync. The data where "pulled" by the backup server. Sender: Now CentOS 5.9, receiver CentOS 6 updated on July 3. Up to yesterday it run OK. Today morning I made yum update to sender CentOS 5 Now I get rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [receiver] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at

Hello, I use procedures for backup with rsync. The data where "pulled" by the backup server. Sender: Now CentOS 5.9, receiver CentOS 6 updated on July 3. Up to yesterday it run OK. Today morning I made yum update to sender CentOS 5 Now I get rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [receiver] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at

We've had the following problem with samba-3.0.4 - samba.3.0.5: Very strange behavior on mapped shares when the user is a member of "Domain Admins", Unix group "domadm". samba-3.0.0 - samba-3.0.5: Setting "hide unreadable" on a share hides everything when "security=DOMAIN". These problems disappeared from our test environment after upgrading to