similar to: suggestions about file ownership in multi-user "sandbox"

Just wondering if any 4.2 users out there have a favourite "dumb" PCI controller to add a couple of SATA ports to a motherboard that doesn't include SATA support. I'm not looking for anything fancy, just 2 SATA ports that a recent vintage kernel will recognize without a lot of configuration gymnastics. The intended use is for relatively light weight internet browser

On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:28:01PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:37:32PM +0000, Richard wrote: > > > > I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome > > 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: > > > > This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates > > because this Linux

Dear r-devel, options() are basically global variables and they come with several issues: * they're not really truly owned by a package aside from loose naming conventions * they're not validated * their documentation is not standard, and they're often not documented at all, it's hard to know what options exist * in practice they're sometimes used for internal purposes, which

On Feb 10, 2017, at 6:58 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > I suspect that, for many targets, this is possible. It is just that no one has done the work to make this happen. Ah, ok, just surprising to me then, as I find it more palatable to write the generator than to produce the list. > So that we're on the same page, I believe you're talking about getting rid of

I suspect this has been asked 400 times, but Google yields 2-3 rather complex gymnastics in blogs (and possibly dated), and searching list archives on ruby-forum proves kinda useless. Using standard forms, it''s fairly easy to use @object.errors[:field_name] in the form to embed an error message right next to the field that has the invalid entry. The controller uses a simple conditional

On 9 August 2017 at 19:38, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> wrote: > On 8/9/2017 9:11 AM, Alex Bradbury via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> Option 3: Teach va_arg to handle aggregates >> * In this option, va_arg might reasonably be expected to handle a >> struct, >> but would not be expected to have detailed ABI-specific knowledge. e.g. >> it

On 29/03/2024 10:52 a.m., Antoine Fabri wrote: > Dear r-devel, > > options() are basically global variables and they come with several issues: > * they're not really truly owned by a package aside from loose naming > conventions > * they're not validated > * their documentation is not standard, and they're often not documented at > all, it's hard to know

Dear R-devel: The following code seems to allow one function to permanently modify a calling function. I did not expect this would be allowed (short of more creative gymnastics) and wonder if it is really intended. (I can see other ways to accomplish the intended task of this code [e.g. via match.call instead of substitute below] that do not trigger the problem, but I don't think that is

Hi, I am new to ruby and to rails, but I like what I see so far. I have been working on a web app in java (servlets and JSPs) that, based on a request from the user, kicks off a thread in the background to perform a task (puts messages in an MQSeries queue). The thread object is stored in the session and I then allow the user to control the task from the browser(like stop it). Is the same

This may not be possible... I have an aggregation of clwholename defined in my model. the aggregation builds clwholename from :first_name, middle_initial, last_name and it generally works fine. I am trying to add a validation so while there may be many ''John'' first_names, and ''Doe'' last_names, I only want one ''John Doe'' so I tried...

Is there any documentation/tutorial that explains how to use virt-sandbox-service? After looking at some writeups about virt-sandbox-service, this looks like a good tool for something I need to do. But, following the "examples" I cannot get anything to work correctly. With a simple xfce install with httpd, lighttpd, and libvirt-sandbox installed, I tried: 1. virt-sandbox-service

I'm trying to build libvirt-sandbox under ubuntu 12.10 sudo apt-get install git build-essential lxc libvirt-bin libvirt-glib-1.0 libglib2.0-0 libglib2.0-dev gtk-doc-tools libxml2-dev libselinux-dev git clone git://libvirt.org/libvirt-sandbox.git cd libvirt-sandbox sudo ./autobuild The error I'm getting: make[2]: Entering directory `/home/user/libvirt-sandbox/build/bin' CC

I'm attempting to build/use libvirt-sandbox on Ubuntu 12.xx. Although I'm still working through dependency issues (including the need for libvirt >= 1.0.2 which is not packaged for ubuntu 12.xx) to build the sandbox code, I have a forward looking question. It appears libvirt-bin for Ubuntu likes apparmor as does most Ubuntu based packages using a LSM impl. However, as I understand

I'm considering using virt-sandbox with lxc to sandbox and execute untrusted code like python scripts and compiled C code. Is it possible to limit CPU and Memory like is possible with lxc-execute and a config file? What are the defaults security settings? Is it completely isolated by default? What's the difference between lxc-execute and libvirt-sandbox? How can I use it in ubuntu?

I am using the Paypal Library for ruby (http://dist.leetsoft.com/api/paypal/) I have been testing it in development mode and the paypal sandbox site. Now I have moved my application into production mode but the paypal url still goes to the sandbox site: https://www.sandbox.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr How do I change the paypal URL? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

While debugging Scudo on ChromeOS, we found that the no reserve mode immediately crashed `sshd`. We tracked it down to the sandbox-seccomp-filter. Being able to mmap with MAP_NORESERVE is useful (if not necessary) for some overcommitting allocators. During mmap calls, the flag MAP_NORESERVE is used by some allocators such as LLVM's Scudo for layout optimisation. This causes the sandbox

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:25:47PM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:50 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:07:33PM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > > > This makes sense if the device is backed by a block device on oVirt side, > > > and the NBD support efficient zeroing. But in this case the device

Hi all. I have an old windows VM with an oldish cygwin that I use for the regression tests. Investigating one of the test failures, I see that it's for UsePrivilegeSeparation=sandbox, and it seems to be because setrlimit(RLIMIT_FSIZE, ...) is not supported. IMO, this isn't a big loss, since the most useful thing in the rlimit "sandbox" is the descriptor limits. Can anyone see

Dear all, I have been trying to set up the set up Libvirt Sandbox without success. I want to use virt-sandbox in order to run untrusted programs in a secure environment. I am had no knowledge about virtualization until a couple of days ago, so I am probably doing something wrong. The scenario is the following: Linode instance. OS that I have tried: Ubuntu 14.04, Ubuntu 14, Fedora 21. Both

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2204 Bug ID: 2204 Summary: gssapi-with-mic and UsePrivilegeSeparation sandbox Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.4p1 Hardware: amd64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: Kerberos support Assignee: