similar to: wrong create mask on files

Is there a way to have users of the samba server, but not add them by smbpasswd -a <UserID>? I want the samba server to be a domain member and the users to only authentic from the PDC. These are the steps that I have attempted: Users are in both the Windows domain and the UNIX NIS account 1. smbpasswd -j <Domain> -r PDC -U <admin> Joined the Domain 2. edited the

Hi, I have a share (testshare) where different unix groups (testgroup1, testgroup2) should have access to. But I want that new files are only created with 660 permissions. Here are the ACL's of testshare: # file: testshare # owner: ralfgro # group: ve user::rwx group::rwx group:testgroup1:rwx group:testgroup2:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::---

Dear R-devel, My current research focuses upon sensitivity analyses which require [1] clusterings of patients in a baseline covariate X-space and [2] examining the distribution of within-cluster treatment differences in outcome. I have generated some primitive R code for this, but I really need to be able to interact with graphical displays of within-cluster information (local average

Hi list I have a strange problem with my Samba 3.04 server running on redhat 9 with 2.4.24 kernel (with acl patch from acl.bestbits.at applied to it). Acls are working fine on my system, and my server is working fine as a Samba PDC (or so it seems). I can view and modify any permissions on the existing files that are being shared. If setfacl has been used to grant additional users

One of our employees is having an odd problem with Adobe Photoshop. Files he saves with Photoshop are saved with permissions 777, completely ignoring both the create mask and the default ACL for the directory. Files he creates with other programs have the correct permissions. This has me stumped. It appears I can reproduce the problem at will. Client is Windows NT 4.0 SP6a and Adobe Photoshop

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

I've just tried setting up a Shrike (9) version of Redhat. Using the medium settings of lokkit, then adding manually accept commands for ports 137/udp 138/udp, 139/tcp and 445/tcp, I thought I should have been ready to go. This isn't the case, however. I know it's not the smb.conf settup because when I kill iptables samba works. When iptables IS running however, it will respond

Dear All, I manage a Debian Squeeze GNU/Linux (with kernel 2.6.32-5-686 #1 SMP) with Samba 3.5.6 (samba 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze8 package is installed). I have a "test" directory with native Linux ACL permissions. getfacl test's output: # file: test # owner: akos # group: grp # flags: -s- user::rwx group::rwx group:read:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::rwx

Hi, I have a problem with my Samba/WinBIND implementation. In folders shared by multiple people the last one to access and modify a file takes ownership of the file and changes the permissions so other users cannot make changes to the same file: [root@atlas PLANNING RECORDS]# cd REGIONAL\ 1\ AIRLINE\ DOCS/ [root@atlas REGIONAL 1 AIRLINE DOCS]# ls -al total 1232 drwxrws---+ 8 root

opensuse 10/find / samba-3.0.20b-3.3 I'm trying to change directory permissions on a share so all users can modify files in the share and when I do as suggested in Ch15 of Samba Howto the following happens $ find `directory_name' -type d -exec chown nobody:users {}\; find: missing argument to `-exec' Chris Boyd Systems Engineer USIT 19-21 Aston Quay Dublin 2 Ireland Tel: +353 1

Do you have to enable encrypted passwords for smbpasswd to work? I have yet to enable encryption because I wanted to test everything first, but have enabled 'update encrypted = Yes' so that this will update the smbpasswd file. I also have 'unix password sync = Yes'. However, I cannot get smbpasswd to change the passwords, either by user or root. Any suggestions? Carey

Thanks to all that have helped so far. I now have a test server running on Ubuntu 6.06 and Samba 3.0.22. I also configured ACL and user_xattr on the filesystem running the shares. But now I have very strange behavior that I hope someone has a clue about. User smith can open two files (foo.txt and faa.txt) with Notepad, Wordpad and Microsoft Word. The behavior for all three is different:

Imo, this is a left over of an old bug, just remove the file Registry.po imo, i'll bet its never used. The computer looks for Registry.pol not Registry.po. > -rwxrwx--- 1 root users 958 2014-09-13 04:01 Registry.po* > -rwxrwx--- 1 3000000 users 958 2014-09-13 04:01 Registry.pol* Look at the date 2014, and i do remember something about this. But... What does getfacl say about

FYI:, I'm fairly new to samba (a couple of months now), and have experimented - unsuccessfully - with getting it to work with clearcase. Does anyone have a how-to, or a list of gotcha's for setting up clearcase with samba? Thanks in advance for any information you can send me. Ozzie,

Hello folks, Samba 3.5.6 running and I have following share: [public] path = /data/public read only = No create mask = 0777 directory mask = 0777 directory security mask = 0750 vfs object = acl_xattr nt acl support = yes dos filemode = yes My filesystem ext4 which is mounted to /data supports acl,user_xattr and

Hi, I have some code that looks like: dftc <- df[sets$tcset,] pt <- numeric(nrow(dftc)) sub <- 1:nrow(dftc) for (i in 1:nrow(dftc)) { n <- nnet( fmla, data=dftc, weights=wts, subset=sub[-i], size=4, decay=0.01) pt[i] <- predict( n, dftc[ i, ], type='class' ) } However running this give me the error: Error in eval(expr, envir, enclos) :

Hi, I am using R-1.5.1 on windows 2000. I encountered a problem when I tried to load a ascii .RData file whose first line is "RDA2". The error message is "restore file may be from a newer version of R -- no data loaded". I noticed that the error comes from magic comparison when load file. The magic comparision of the first five characters in the ascii file and the

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 6 februari 2019 16:33 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] unix_primary_group = yes don t work > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 15:58:52 +0100 > L.P.H. van Belle <belle at bazuin.nl> wrote: > > > Hai

On 24/02/15 20:35, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 24/02/15 20:23, John wrote: >> I apologise for asking a basic question but I haven't been able to >> determine a sensible answer. >> >> I am using 4.1.17 as AD-DC. All configured and working with user home >> directories via [homes] and some other specific shares. >> >> Windows 7 client jointed to domain,

> > On the file serever: > > Collected config --- 2019-07-03-10:27 ----------- > > > > Hostname: srv > > DNS Domain: a.b.hu > > FQDN: srv.a.b.hu > > ipaddress: 10.0.3.15 192.168.0.8 > > ----------- > > Samba is running as a Unix domain member > > ----------- > > > > This computer is running Debian 10.0 x86_64 > >