similar to: NT4 Terminal Server & samba-3.0.3-5 +

I am trying to configure a public file share on \\fs1\vol1 From a Windows 7 command prompt, I enter: dir \\fs1\vol1 Windows says: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. Where am I going wrong? Error log says: " SPNEGO login failed: NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER" - that must have something to do with this, but I thought that was the point of "map to guest = Bad User"

On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 06:50:42 -0500 John Schmerold via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I am trying to configure a public file share on \\fs1\vol1 > > From a Windows 7 command prompt, I enter: dir \\fs1\vol1 > Windows says: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. > > Where am I going wrong? > > Error log says: " SPNEGO login failed:

Hey all, I'm having a bit of a problem with cross-subnet browsing where one of the subnets is managed by an OpenVPN server. My network is set up with a central wireless router running OpenWRT. 192.168.10.x is the subnet for wired hosts and 192.168.20.x is the subnet for wireless hosts. To allow cross-subnet browsing, the OpenWRT router is running as a WINS server (samba). Now, I've

Hi, I have a lab with 10 machines acting as storage servers for some compute machines, using glusterfs to distribute the data as two volumes. Created using: gluster volume create vol1 192.168.10.{221..230}:/data/vol1 gluster volume create vol2 replica 2 192.168.10.{221..230}:/data/vol2 and mounted on the client and server machines using: mount -t glusterfs 192.168.10.221:/vol1 /mnt/vol1 mount

Hello Samba gurus. I'm in upgrade hell after upgrading my backup rh9 server and fc2 linux box to 3.0.10 from 3.0.7. rh9 rpm package was from the samba site and the fc2 rpms from redhat. I now have a system where the win xp and win98se machines on the network can read/write to the backup share but my fc2 box only has read only access to the share - it could write before the upgrade. I tried

I'm running RedHat 8.0 with samba-2.2.7-5.8.0 (installed from RedHat distribution) When I use cpio to write a backup (> 2GB) to a smbfs filesystem, I get the error: File size limit exceeded I get the same error when I linux copy (cp) a file (> 2GB) from a Linux ext3 filesystem to the smbfs filesystem. The smbfs filesystem is mounted from a Windows 2000 Professional workstation. After

We have been using ZFS for user home directories for a good while now. When we discovered the problem with full filesystems not allowing deletes over NFS, we became very anxious to fix this; our users fill their quotas on a fairly regular basis, so it''s important that they have a simple recourse to fix this (e.g., rm). I played around with this on my OpenSolaris box at home, read around

Hi, I m facing problem in "rsync" rtelated to the time-stamp of the files. Im using rsync for transfering the file from my m/c (OS :jaluna-linux) to a remote m/c(OS:jaluna-linux) and even if there was no change in the files on my m/c, when i rsync them to remote m/c the time-stamp of the file on remote m/c (which i transfered from my m/c) will change. my file name is bigfile and it is

Mine has been working well, but the only problem is that it doesn't support callerid (from the POTS side). > -----Original Message----- > From: John Schmerold [mailto:john@katy.com] > Sent: Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:37 PM > To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Zhone Zplex 10 units > > Thanks for the Zplex heads up. > > Steven

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 18:28, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root at stor1 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1

Hi Jose, On 28 February 2018 at 22:31, Jose V. Carri?n <jocarbur at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nithya, > > My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. > A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks > per volume). > Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance > force' operation.

Helle everyone, Let's say we have 3 servers, 2 of them have the latest (stable) version of rsyncd running (2.6.9) <Server1> ==> I N T E R N E T ==> <Server2 (rsyncd running)> ==> LAN ==> <Server3 (rsyncd running)> Suppose I want to send a big file (bigfile.big) from Server1 to both Server2 and Server3. It would be a good idea to send first from Server1

I'm sorry for my last incomplete message. Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root at stor1 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor1data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor1data:/volumedisk1

Hi Nithya, My initial setup was composed of 2 similar nodes: stor1data and stor2data. A month ago I expanded both volumes with a new node: stor3data (2 bricks per volume). Of course, then to add the new peer with the bricks I did the 'balance force' operation. This task finished successfully (you can see info below) and number of files on the 3 nodes were very similar . For volumedisk1 I

Hi Nithya, Below the output of both volumes: [root at stor1t ~]# gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 status Node Rebalanced-files size scanned failures skipped status run time in h:m:s --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------

Hi Jose, There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. The "shared-brick-count" values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other nodes so we can check if they are the cause. Regards, Nithya [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1558 Summary: Sftp client does not correctly process server response messages after write error Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 4.3p2 Platform: amd64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sftp

--delete --force Won't Remove Directories With Dotnames rsync 2.6.9 Me, personally, I reckon this to be an irritant ... but perhaps (and having thought about this a bit I decided it's a good chance) this is an intentional and useful behaviour. But it's a nuisance if you call your --partial-dir .partial, as I happen to do, since now if you remove a directory which was aborted in

Hi Nag Pavan Chilakam Can I use this command "gluster vol add-brick vol1 replica 2 file01g:/brick3/data/vol1 file02g:/brick4/data/vol1" in both file server 01 and 02 exited without add new servers. Is it ok for expanding volume? Thanks for your support Regards, Giang 2017-06-14 22:26 GMT+07:00 Nag Pavan Chilakam <nag.chilakam at gmail.com>: > Hi, > You can use add-brick