similar to: Samba automatically disabled?

Samba Ldap experts, I am trying to recompile samba to support ldap. After compiling samba with --with-ldapsam, I had no errors with configure or compilation. However, after starting up smbd and nmbd, I get these errors in the log.smbd file when I try to connect to the server: [2004/12/20 13:57:02, 0] lib/debug.c:reopen_logs(590) Unable to open new log file /var/log/samba/smbd.log: No

Hello again, How do I split a data frame into smaller, completely separate data frames (rather than separate data frames comprising a single "list")? Consider the following data, and my coding attempt: x <- read.table(textConnection("id type number indv.1 bagel 6 indv.2 bagel 1 indv.3 donuts 10 indv.4 donuts 9"), header = TRUE) closeAllConnections() x.split <-

Dovecot experts, We just recently deployed Dovecot 1.0.rc15 on a Redhat 5 system. I have over 1400 users. At first it appeared to work fine. But soon, we had complaints of students that couldn't retrieve their email. I looked in the logs and found this error. Jan 7 22:27:31 stu dovecot: auth(default): pam(pucklisl,<http://144.89.40.6>144.89.40.6): pipe() failed: Too many

Thanks, I seem to have gotten sub-registers to work. I can't seem to suppress the zero-extend sometimes. There is no need to explicitly zero extend bytes to words on this machine as all byte operations do that. I have also gotten some memory-to-memory to work. Bagel Evan Cheng wrote: > On Mar 14, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Bagel wrote: > >> I'm trying to write a backend for a

Samba experts, I am using Samba 3.0.8 on an AIX 5.1 system with ldap authentication. I have ldap working so that users can authenticate in their samba account via ldap. However, I am trying to figure out the best method for allowing users to change their ldap samba account password. What is the best method to allow end users to change their LM/NT passwords for Samba via LDAP? Should

On 02/16/2017 12:08 PM, Stephen Canon wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2017, at 9:12 AM, Bagel <bagel99 at gmail.com >> <mailto:bagel99 at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> I figured that the optimization of this would bedifficult (else it would >> have already been done :-)) > > Don’t make this assumption. There’s lots of opportunities for optimization > scattered

On 23 November 2010 18:03, Bagel <bagel99 at gmail.com> wrote: > Would someone be so kind as to tell me what the status of debugging symbols > (DWARF) generated by clang/llvm is? Hi Bagel, It should be fairly complete... > When I generate an executable with "clang -g" followed by "llc -O0" and feed it > to gdb, I get "no debugging symbols found".

Samba experts, Ok, we are having so many problems getting ldap to work, we decided to start over with our compile. We are compiling Samba --with-ldap on our AIX 5.1 system which uses gcc. Openldap (for client support) exists in /usr/local/openldap/2.2.17. In order for Samba to find the ldap.h file, we had to configure with CPPFLAGS="-I/usr/local/openldap/2.2.17/include"

> On Feb 21, 2017, at 9:54 PM, Nemanja Ivanovic via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I believe that providing additional intrinsics that would directly produce the ISD::ADDC/ISD::SUBC nodes would provide the additional advantage of being able to directly produce these nodes for code that doesn't have anything to do with multiprecision addition/subtraction. I am

On 06/24/2011 03:45 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Jun 24, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Bagel wrote: > >> It appears the syntax for returning multiple values has changed since 2.9. >> Previous to that: >> ret i32 %a, i32 %b >> worked. The new syntax is something like: >> ret { i32, i32 }{i32 %a, i32 %b} >> but this yields an error: >> mrv-bug.ll:5:24:

On Mar 14, 2008, at 10:17 AM, Bagel wrote: > I'm trying to write a backend for a machine that has both byte and > word > instructions. Both varieties of instructions operate on the same > set of > general registers. A byte mode instruction on a general register > always clears > the upper bits. Register-to-register byte mode and work mode > instructions set

I think I have read that there are plans to generate object code (e.g. ELF) directly in addition to assembly language source. If so, are there plans to support branch relaxation for targets which support long/short branch displacements? This is typically done in assemblers. thanks, bagel

Would someone be so kind as to tell me what the status of debugging symbols (DWARF) generated by clang/llvm is? I am on a linux x86-64 system (Fedora 13). Is gdb supposed to understand the generated DWARF? When I generate an executable with "clang -g" followed by "llc -O0" and feed it to gdb, I get "no debugging symbols found". What is the status of lldb on

ARM has its own pass to do this (ARMConstantIslandPass.cpp). At some point of time we'd like to rip out the branch relaxation part and make it into a target independent pass. Evan On Aug 13, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Bagel wrote: > I think I have read that there are plans to generate object code > (e.g. ELF) > directly in addition to assembly language source. If so, are there

On 12/03/2010 06:28 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > We are working on a document. Here is current draft: > http://wiki.llvm.org/Debug_Information > > - > Devang While this is great news, it doesn't completely satisfy my needs. Your documentation assumes one is going to use the LLVM provided functions (such as DIFactory::). My front-end can't use them because it is not

I'm trying to write a backend for a machine that has both byte and word instructions. Both varieties of instructions operate on the same set of general registers. A byte mode instruction on a general register always clears the upper bits. Register-to-register byte mode and work mode instructions set condition codes based on bytes and words and thus are not interchangeable. Do I need to

Yes, I know this works peachy keen for char arrays. I'm looking at (which is hard to express in C) something like void foo () { int bar[20] = { 42, 42, ..., 42 }; } I don't want to do a memcopy of the 20 element constant array, and memset doesn't work here. I want an intrinsic that copys the scalar int constant 42 to each element of the int array. bagel On 11/10/2016 03:30

Sorry if this is an FAQ...I have seen reports of this problem on several mailing lists, but never a solution. I have used Samba on Solaris for years, currently 2.2.1 on Solaris 9. Trying to upgrade to 3.0.6, with no luck on 2 different Solaris 9 systems. It compiles and installs OK, but clients can't connect. Not only Win2k and XP PC's, but smbclient -L on the same machine

I am writing a backend for an experimental machine that has both 2-address and 3-address versions of some instructions. The 2-address versions are more compact and thus preferred when applicable. How does one go about generating the most compact version? 1. At instruction selection, is there a predicate that can test whether one of the input sources is dead, thus allowing the selection of the

On 12/06/2010 12:03 PM, Devang Patel wrote: > As I understand, you are not interested in 'how to use DIFactory'. Do you want > to know what are the fields of metadata to encode debug info for a local variable ? > That'd be > > !7 = metadata !{ > i32, ;; Tag (see below) > metadata, ;; Context > metadata, ;; Name > metadata, ;; Reference to