similar to: EA Bug?

OK, thanks, I've seen such an attribute correlation list elsewhere. So what does the 65 character string mean? user.DOSATTRIB=0sMHgyMAAAAwADAAAAEQAAACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPnD7jBHStABAAAAAAAAAAA= Obviously this isn't a bunch of 0x1's and 0x2s bit fields (or are they?). These attributes are from a file on the Redirected Folders directory hosted on the Samba4 AD/DC. I

I have the following attributes for a typical file on my redirected folders residing on my Samba4 AD/DC: $ getfattr -d "Newletters/Newsletter 2013-09.docx" # file: Newletters/Newsletter 2013-09.docx user.DOSATTRIB=0sMHgyMAAAAwADAAAAEQAAACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPnD7jBHStABAAAAAAAAAAA= What do these characters mean? I'm searching for a particular attribute. I have found

I cannot access home samba share from windows. Windows client displays a permission denied error. The problem is not Linux permissions for the user directory, permission is still denied when permissions are to 777. I don't think the problem is selinux, because no denials appear in any logs. I don't think it's an extended attributes issue from xfs, because I don't see any attributes

Hello. I believe that I've done my due diligence in researching what info. is currently available on this issue. I have been jacking with this for days, & believe that I have tried all possible solutions. I am basically trying to move a [Merant] PVCS installation from an OS/2 file server to a SuSE/Samba file server. This installation consists of 'standard' source archives,

Hi all, Is there a way to control the default DOS attributes stored in the user.DOSATTRIB value? I'm using a QNAP NAS device (running Samba) that seems to create files that have the 'hidden' DOS attribute set by the user.DOSATTRIB value as a default. The NAS device's smb.conf has the 'store dos attributes' option set to yes and each of the 'map hidden',

I used setenforce 0, and I was extremely surprised to see a burst of selinux denials appear in the journal. So I corrected the problem with: setsebool -P use_samba_home_dirs 1 And updating some policies. Thanks very much! I have never before dealt with selinux denials that don't appear in the journal until "enforcing" is changed to "permissive". Is this a samba

This is really strange. The samba server in question is a domain member server on a Windows NT 4.0 Domain network. It runs Gentoo 2004.3 with a 2.4.24 kernel. The Gentoo server was upgraded from Samba 3.0.5 to 3.0.8 last night. After the upgrade, the server had to be re-joined to the domain. After that, everything appeared to be working. This morning we found that the MSAccess database files

Everyone, I have finally resolved the new heartburn 3.0.24 on Ubuntu Feisty was giving me and have stumbled upon some information that might help others out there. I was seeing problems with ACL entries getting mangled and disappearing, Excel making files read only and extended attributes doing bizarre things. The solution revolved around what appears to be a change in how ACLs are managed.

Hai, This is al about samba ea ( extended attibutes ) support. Samba can map attibutes in two ways: Mapping DOS file attributes to UNIX permissions Storing the DOS attributes in extended file attributes The user.DOSATTRIB extended attribute contains a bit field indicating the state of each DOS attribute: Read-Only = 0x1 Hidden = 0x2 System = 0x4 Archive = 0x20 and in smb.conf related

hello folks dont know if this is a faq: a customer currently uses a Suse 9.2 pro with the last version of Samba to share a folder containing data for an Enterprise Management program (Windows based). everything works fine with local clients (many 98s and 1 XP machine). we have some (15) clients connecting to the ERP program via a Terminal Server (Windows2K server). these clients often stuck

Hi, I'm using Samba 3.0.24 in a LAN with Windows-only clients (Win2000/WinXP), and I've set it up to store DOS flags in extended attributes to make users happy: ea support = yes map archive = no map system = no map hidden = no store dos attributes = yes Now I was having a look at the current attributes in all my shared files, and was

interesting warning - is that not implicit and why? uses vfs_fruit, but that requires \"ea support = yes\" Apr 23 21:32:27 srv-rhsoft ark: kf5.kio.core: We got some errors while running testparm "Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf\nLoaded services file OK.\nERROR: Service \"filesharing\" uses vfs_fruit, but that requires \"ea support =

Hi, I'm running Samba 4.8 servers with Windows ACL enabled shares (following https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_Share_Using_Windows_ACLs). This manual demands to set map acl inherit = yes store dos attributes = yes and requires extended attribute support from the share file system. So far, so good. Now I shall upgrade to CentOS 7.7 which brings Samba 4.9 which changes

Hi, I'm a n00b, but I was hoping you could help me with EA Download Manager. From what I understand, some have gotten it partially working, and others may have gotten it working completely. This is what I get: [Image: http://img25.imageshack.us/img25/4113/screenshoterrorz.png ] It's supposed to look more like this: [Image: http://screenshots.en.softonic.com/en/scrn/62000/62174/3_ea3.jpg

Please can someone clarify the purpose of the "ea support = yes" option in smb.conf? According to the man page, it's there to allow _clients_ to attempt to store OS/2 style extended attributes. As long as the underlying server filesystem supports EAs, this will work. However, I've seen a number of references to setting "ea support = yes" when people just want to store

Jerry, Jeremy, Whilst fixing bug 2445, I stumbled across NFSv4 ACLs with EA version 2 capability. This is only supported on filesystems that are created JFS2 with Extended Attribute Version 2 support which is part of the NFSv4 ACL support native to JFS2 in AIX 5.3. This is new in AIX 5.3 and I'd like to get to work implementing it as an addition to Linux and IRIX EA support. Are the any

Hi! I've been tearing my hair out trying to get DOS file attributes to work with Samba. Basically, I have it all set up so the user mbolingbroke (me) can write to this Supernova Backup share I have - this all works fine. However, since this is going to backup my Windows machine I want to preserve the file attributes. To this end, I've set up mapping of the attributess using "map

Hi, I have a question regarding permissions at the top of a share as seen from a Windows 10 client. We are using Samba 4.10.6-Debian (van Belle) on Debian 10 (Buster) with one AD controller and one file server. The top directory of our main share on the file server has, on the Linux level, these permissions reported by getfacl: # file: ... # owner: root # group: domain\040users # flags: ---

Samba DM config below. Directories with setgid: $ll /home4/group total 32 drwxrws--- 7 NIS\nisadmin NIS\audio 4096 Jul 24 14:14 audio drwxrwx--- 2 NIS\nisadmin NIS\dok-sprava 4096 Jul 21 09:23 dok-sprava drwxrwx--- 2 NIS\nisadmin NIS\poj 4096 Jul 23 08:38 poj drwxrwx--- 2 NIS\nisadmin NIS\projekty 4096 Jul 23 09:14 projekty When user creates file/dir directly on linux, the

Hi all When rsync replicate one file to remote side, will the extended attributes be copied as well? Thanks, Ming