similar to: mount with uid does not give correct local uid (kernel 2.6)

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "mount with uid does not give correct local uid (kernel 2.6)"

2011 May 13
0
Winbindd can't convert between SIDs and uid/gid
Samba 3.5.8 on OpenSolaris (SunOS 5.11) Intel platform; gcc 4.2.3; built with "configure --with-winbind --with-krb5 --with-ldap --with-ads" Samba is joined to our Windows-2008 AD domain. Pretty much everything works, except that winbindd can't convert between SIDs and uid/gid: 1. wbinfo -r WIN\\lanz (Returns nothing -- no output) First I obtain my SID from "wbinfo -n
2008 Jun 30
2
Smbd internal error and panic with nfs-mounted share
We're trying to share a directory that's mounted via NFS from another server; when we connect to that share, smbd panics and tries to dump core. This is samba-3.0.30 on Alpha/Tru64-4.0G. The directory we're trying to use is exported from a Linux box called sesfs (Centos 4.4) and mounted on the Alpha server via NFS as /sesfs/scratch. I've appended below an edited summary from
2010 Jan 18
1
[PATCH 1/2] nv30-nv40: Rewrite primitive splitting and emission
The current code for primitive splitting and emission on pre-nv50 is severely broken. In particular: 1. Quads and lines are totally broken because "&= 3" should be "&= ~3" and similar for lines 2. Triangle fans and polygons are broken because the first vertex must be repeated for each split chunk 3. Line loops are broken because the must be converted to a line strip,
2004 Jan 28
0
A Message you sent has not been delivered
MailMarshal (an automated content monitoring gateway) has not delivered the following message: Message: B000184f79.00000001.mml From: r-devel@r-project.org To: dominic.lowndes@telecomfinance.com Subject: Jay This is due to automatic rules that have determined that the intended recipient is not authorised to receive messages with Executable file(s) attached. If you believe
2007 Apr 01
4
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM as a crosscompiler
Hi Koen, The process to build llvm-gcc as a crosscompiler is basically the same as build a normal gcc as crosscompiler. The differences: you need a LLVM installed (compiled for the host). You must configure llvm-gcc with --enable-llvm. Problems: - Today LLVM supports ARM/EABI, but llvm-gcc don't. You must apply the patch:
2007 Jun 21
0
mISDN problems
Hi all, we're buildin an Asterisk box based on an Intel IXP425 board. The board uses a Beronet BN2S0 ISDN card, mISDN 1.1.4 and asterisk 1.4.2. hfc_multi has been patched to compile under big endian cpu, and so also capi kernel files. All the modules seem to load correctly (configuration was made with misdn-init config), but when starting cha_misdn, asterisk outputs the following lines: P[ 1]
2010 Jun 10
2
ISDN -> SIP
i am using asterisk 1.6.2 with mISDN and a passive AVM Fritz!card on CentOS 5.5. The only thing, i want to do is a call-redirection from an isdn-call to my mobile via sip-account. My extension conf is: general] static=yes writeprotect=no [globals] OUT_PORT=1 [ISDN] exten => 12345,1,Dial(SIP/012346737222 at sipprovider.local) If i call to the msn 12345, the SIP-call is going out, but after
2008 Nov 05
0
b410p mIDSN - RNIS signaling problems
Hi. I'm running Asterisk server with 10 sip phones, and 2 grouped T0 lines with 10 DDI numbers. My provider is France Telecom and my setup is : - Debian Lenny - Asterisk 1.4 - Linux kernel 2.6.25.17 - mISDN 1.1.8 driver - Sip phones Thomson ST2030 No problem with the SIP . But when reveiving a call on RNIS line (any of the DDI numbers), the associated SIP phone rings indicating _two_
2007 Feb 09
0
Misdn instability with asterisk 1.4
recently i've upgraded asterisk from 1.2.4 to 1.4 All works fine but i'me experencing some instability on misdn channels. In the last week i've experienced twice some problems with misdn (I am using mISDN-1_0_4) dmesg output: mISDN_rdata: rport queue overflow 256/256 [addr:52020501 prim:120282 dinfo:ffffffff] mISDN_rdata: rport queue overflow 256/256 [addr:52020501 prim:120282
2009 Jan 26
1
Samba password problem when in domain
Hi, In our network, I have set up a samba server in a workgroup. We're now migrating to a domain, using SBS 2003. When I locally login on XP and access the samba server, it works just fine. But, when I login on the domain and then try to access the same samba box, it doesn't accept my password. The username for my samba account and account on the domain are the same. Also, the name of
2011 May 17
1
How can I confirm that idmap_ad is being used?
How can I confirm that idmap_ad is being called? I've configured Samba with --with-shared-modules=idmap_ad, built and installed it; the file ad.so is now present in /usr/local/samba/lib/ idmap/ as expected. I then added the following to smb.conf: idmap backend = tdb idmap uid = 65536 - 999999 idmap gid = 65536 - 999999 idmap config SU : backend = ad idmap config SU :
2009 Feb 06
0
set caller id on outgoing calls through BRI ISDN lines
I'm trying to set caller ids on outgoing calls. I have a quad BRI B410P card connected to my telephony provider. I know the list of DID numbers the provider assigned to my company. If I don't set the caller id then the callee always sees the same "top-level" number. If I set the caller id to a specific DID number we own, the callee keeps seeing the "top-level" number,
2011 Jun 28
1
Porting CTDB to Solaris
We wanted to try out clustered Samba on a pair of small OpenSolaris/ Intel boxes. But after downloading the CTDB source from the Samba git repository, I discovered that it won't build on Solaris -- the configure script supports only Linux and AIX. Is there a Solaris port for CTDB, or is somebody working on one? (If not, I might take a crack at it; would it be a straightforward port?)
2009 Feb 06
1
set caller id on outgoing calls through BRI ISDNlines
Use Set(CALLERID(num)=9999999999) instead of using CALLERID(all). Remember to set this BEFORE you Dial. -->> -----Original Message----- -->> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- -->> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Vieri -->> Sent: 06 February 2009 12:36 -->> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com -->>
2006 Jun 08
1
BN8S0 problem - Extension can never match, so disconnecting
hi i've configured a Beronet BN8S0 Card with misdn beronet utility. the card is configured with all lines in TE and P2P mode, and it is connected with the special cable with an ISDN connection. i've turned on debugging to level 4, this is the output from the asterisk cli when i receive a call: P[ 5] MGMT: Short status dinfo 1000001 P[ 5] MGMT: SSTATUS: L1_ACTIVATED P[ 5] handle_frm:
2007 Apr 01
0
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM as a crosscompiler
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anton Korobeynikov schreef: > Hello, Koen. > >> So my question is: How should I build llvm and llvm-gcc4 to have it cross-compile from x86 >> to ARM/EABI? > Well, just supply appropriate --host/--target options to configure. To llvm or llvm-gcc4? > I haven't tried ARM, but this definitely works for crosscompiling from
2008 Jun 03
2
unsafe_string_function_usage_here when linking smbd
I'm trying to build 3.0.30 on Alpha/Tru64-4.0G. The configure step works, but make fails when it tries to link smbd: Compiling popt/popt.c Compiling popt/poptconfig.c Compiling popt/popthelp.c Compiling popt/poptparse.c Linking bin/smbd ld: Unresolved: __unsafe_string_function_usage_here_size_t__ gmake: *** [bin/smbd] Error 1 This Should Never Happen :) -- that looks like a message for the
1998 Apr 07
2
SAMBA digest 1647
Very very very cool. I have been thinking of this one myself. I thought I tested it and that I came to the conclusion that Samba did not recognize named pipes, and just treated them like normal files (overwriting them when you drag a text file onto them). But I must have made a mistake somewhere. It' perfect. The way I will set it up is like this: a Progress program will sit on a named
2009 Feb 06
1
set caller id on outgoing calls through BRIISDNlines
You're quite right. We'll need to see your misdn.conf file to check the settings. -->> -----Original Message----- -->> From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- -->> bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Vieri -->> Sent: 06 February 2009 13:49 -->> To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com -->> Subject:
2014 Jun 25
0
Alleged bug in Silk codec
Yes, regarding the unsigned to signed conversion you are right, it is implementation defined. I just had an issue a couple of years ago with a compiler which incorrectly treated unsigned overflow as undefined rather than implementation defined? Regarding the 64 bit profiling: I looked at the disassembly (gcc ?c ?S ?O2 ../opus/silk/sum_sqr_shift.c ?I../opus/include ?I../opus/celt) of the 64 bit