similar to: RE: XP Pro timeout; we have a winner - webclient service

This is really strange. The samba server in question is a domain member server on a Windows NT 4.0 Domain network. It runs Gentoo 2004.3 with a 2.4.24 kernel. The Gentoo server was upgraded from Samba 3.0.5 to 3.0.8 last night. After the upgrade, the server had to be re-joined to the domain. After that, everything appeared to be working. This morning we found that the MSAccess database files

Hi everyone, we are using custom dfree commands to implement quotas. While these work fine on normal shares, the "dfree command" parameter seems to be ignored in the homes section. Is this correct (and intended)? Best regards Felix IT-Services Telefon 02461 61-9243 E-Mail: f.stolte at fz-juelich.de -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Very long story short... 1. Samba server on machine running iptables or behind a firewall 2. Client XP domain logins taking 45 seconds or more. 3. The problem: webDAV (webclient) is running on the XP workstations and this mysteriously triggers access to port 80 on the file server, which in turn adds up to long delays. If you are running an HTTP server and it isn't blocked then

Hi! We've had horrible performance when opening files from out Samba server with OpenOffice.org on some of our XP machines (not on all, I might add). Also, the general file transfers (copy to/from server) were fast and adequate. Then I had stumbled upon the Samba HOWTO which mentioned turning off this "WebClient" service on WinXP. I'm just rather curious, why does this

Is there a possibility of accepting a KLEE project as an LLVM GSoC project? -- Aleksander "Alistra" Balicki email: balicki.aleksander at gmail.com jabber: wszystkie.inne.byly.zajete at gmail.com

Hey all, up until 2 weeks ago my samba DC was running just fine, then it began crashing randomly. I was using 4.8.0 before, now upgraded to a self-compiled 4.8.3 with default build parameters on an up-to-date centos 7.5 with disabled SELinux and bind9 as DNS backend with samba_dlz. The log output at log level = 10 is as follows: Jul 17 14:49:20 hostname samba[4998]: [2018/07/17 14:49:20.587655,

Hi, Gratian, I did that Summer of Code. I used a different algorithm than Patterson's. It is a constraint system by Su and Wagner, which is more modern, and has some advantages over older works. In particular, it is non-iterative. I found it very hard to compare it with Patterson's analysis, because there is not much description in that paper. However, there is another paper, by

There is a bug in AIC.default and AIC.lm, as illustrated below. (I've only checked this under 1.6.1, and can't easily check if it has already been reported since the site is down.) > lm1 <- lm(y ~ x, list(x=1:10, y=jitter(1:10))) > lm2 <- lm(y ~ x, list(x=1:10, y=jitter(1:10))) > AIC(lm1, lm2) df AIC lm1 3 -18.662493 lm2 3 -7.265906 > AIC(lm1, lm2, k = 2)

Recieving digests. > RNGkind(NULL) [1] "Marsaglia-Multicarry" "Kinderman-Ramage" I would appreciate it if anybody has any comments on the following. Please do not comment on the R functions themselves, since they merely mimic a (bivariate simplification of a) C routine called from S. In particular, I would like to know if anything is available with regard to the

Dear LLVMers and Clangers (did I say that right?), I received the following email from Daniel Stephenson at Apple and thought it would be of interest to those in the LLVM and Clang communities. Inquiries should be directed to Mr. Stephenson (dstephenson at apple.com). -- John T. Apple Cupertino, CA Software Engineer, Front-end Compiler Development Apple is building a new front-end for C,

Hi Felix, On 4/18/24 08:33, Stolte, Felix via samba wrote: > Is this a bug or maybe a misconfiguration? In the latter, which parameters could cause this? I guess the nodes end up using different combinations of dev/inode as primary key for the locking.tdb record. Probably because the device numbers differ on the nodes and you didn't fix this known issue with GPFS with the fileid VFS

> -----Original Message----- > From: Lane Beneke [mailto:nolawyersallowed@yahoo.com] > A simple upgrade from 3.0.5 to 3.0.8 broke file > sharing on a MSAccess 2k database (Win2k and WinXP > clients.) There are Paradox databases on the same > file-share that are working fine. The log files show > no errors. I'm about to try increasing the debug > level, but can

Hello everyone, we are running a CTDB cluster and share folders on ocfs2 volumes via samba using the vfs acl_xattr to store acls in extended attributes. It works fine with Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I'm currently testing 18.04 and have a weird (but reproducable) ACL behaviour: I grant two users a and user b full access on a folder from a windows client. (Share permissions are fullcontrol for

Hi Folks, is the vfs_ceph supporting quota set on a directory inside cephfs? Regards Felix -- Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH 52425 Jülich Sitz der Gesellschaft: Jülich Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Düren Nr. HR B 3498 Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir. Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender), Karsten Beneke (stellv.

Hai Felix, It might be handy to show the line your using for dfree. And could you tell us the OS and samba version your using. Last, is this on a member and/or AD-DC ? Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Stolte, Felix via samba > Verzonden: maandag 29 april 2019 9:50 > Aan: samba at

Hi folks, we are running a clustered Samba Fileserver using CTDB with two public IPs. We observed the following (mis) behavior: If user A with write permissions opens an excel file via public ip A and User B opens the same file via public ip B, both users get a Deny-Write lock on the same file and overwrite each others changes: 0:3693691 145522 DENY_WRITE 0x12019f RDWR

hi, I am quite new on using Samba and sorry maybe ask a silly question here. I set up simple Samba server on Fedora3 using the samba rpm package comes with fedora3( version 3.0.10-1.fc3). I use the SHARE security level to make things easier. Everything goes fine so far, except that for some windows user, some times, on browsing some directories, it takes extremely long time to display the

Full_Name: Alec Stephenson Version: 1.6.0 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (148.88.138.5) Appears to be a sign error in as.POSIX(lt/ct) > library("chron") The following is fine, with default origin. > tmp <- chron(1:2, origin = c(1,1,1970)) > as.POSIXlt(tmp) [1] "1970-01-02 01:00:00 GMT" "1970-01-03 01:00:00 GMT" These are not. > tmp <-

Full_Name: alec stephenson Version: 1.6.0 OS: linux Submission from: (NULL) (148.88.138.5) The documentation for the function require is incorrect. The file library.Rd has in its arguments section \item{quietly}{a logical. If \code{TRUE}, a warning will not be printed if the package cannot be found.} which is incorrect, as a warning message is always given if the package is not

Hello LLVM People, Welcome to LLVM 3.1! Get it here: http://llvm.org/releases/ or read about it: http://llvm.org/releases/3.1/docs/ReleaseNotes.html This release represents approximately 6 months of development over LLVM 3.0, delivers a vast range of improvements and new features. Some of the most visible features include greatly expanded C++'11 support in Clang (including lambdas,