similar to: Winbind problem

Thanks again Rowland for getting back to me.  Here's my comments below: >> /etc/hosts: >> 127.0.0.1       localhost >> 192.168.0.17    ad.domain.intranet ad >> 192.168.0.21    domain-ad.domain.intranet     domain-ad > > Remove the line above, this is the old AD domain and shouldn't have > anything pointing to the new one. Have deleted this line. 

Hi, We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We have an olddomain and a new domainname. To 'translate' *@olddomain into *@newdomain, I have configured: > cat /etc/postfix/canonical > @olddomain.com @newdomain.com While this seems to work, lately we have noticed that dovecot occasionally creates mailboxes for non-existent users, like: >

Hi, On one of my servers (old one, version 1.2.5) user reported that vacation message for basic address works fine, but not for the aliases. I know that this is an old version, but we can't simply switch them to the most current dovecot release without preparing and testing everything... So I'm rather asking for help with debugging the case :) This person has email my.name at

On 8/23/2017 4:30 AM, lists wrote: > Hi, > > Not sure what the lack of replies means... As postfix is also > involved, should I better ask there? > > It seems a little bit in between postfix and dovecot... > > Just to clearify one thing I wrote: > > On 22-8-2017 16:23, lists wrote: >> We're running dovecot 2.2.13, virtual users, with postfix. We >>

On 8/23/2017 2:53 PM, mj wrote: > > On 08/23/2017 06:03 PM, Noel wrote: >> Don't use wildcard aliases.? They break recipient validation and >> cause postfix to accept all addresses. >> >> Instead use 1-1 aliases, such as >> user1 at olddomaon? user1 at newdomain >> user2 at olddomaon? user2 at newdomain > > But we have 500+ addresses in ldap,

Hi all, I wonder if using a per-user sieve_before setting (ie: a relative path to user home, as ~/filter.sieve) is expected to work corretly. Full disclaimer: I am migrating an old CentOS 6.10 box with dovecot 2.0.9 and an old pigenhole version. I now want to redirect emails from old account to new account (I have a csv with old->new address pairs). My first approach using a single, big

Hi, When installing Samba, I made it a PDC in a new domain. Now I would like the old NT4 PDC in the old domain to become a plain host in my Samba domain. Is this possible? I need to keep the old NT4 machine because it's running the Symantec Corporate Edition NAV. In other words, I have NEWDOMAIN with Samba PDC and all clients OLDDOMAIN with NT4 PDC alone, no client Can my NT4 PDC become

I was wondering if somebody could help me with an Apache re-write rule. Apparently CentOS 6.8 is running apache-2.2.15-53. I am trying to redirect all pages except for two pages. The apache rewrite directives in the httpd config are: RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}!^/test/ RewriteCond %{REQUEST_URI}!^/my-folder/ RewriteRule (.*) http://www.newdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L] These commands

Hello, I'm trying to migrate mail accounts from an old server to a new one. As I need to migrate dozens of accounts which take about 1G each, I need to do stateful sync to make my migration in two times : 1 - I run a : doveadm -D -o mail_fsync=never -o imapc_user=user1 at olddomain.fr sync -s "" -R -1 -u user1 at newdomain.fr imapc: > /tmp/firstsync.log 2>&1 my

On 16/10/2017 18:18, Rowland Penny wrote: > > 'workgroup' is not the netbios name, it is the NetBIOS domain name. > The workgroup should also not have a dot in it, 'DOMAIN.LAN' looks > suspiciously like a dns and realm name. > Indeed i lacked of precision, purpose of the post was more "change NetBIOS domain name during clasicupgrade". DOMAIN.LAN is the

I'm having a *terrible* time trying to get Samba 3 to communicate with my Windows 2003 Active Directory Server (the primary and only domain on my network). Basically this is what I'm trying to do: create a Linux File Server to replace my old WinNT 4 File Server. I would like it to show up under all my XP clients on network neighborhood just like the old server, with each account on my

Hello. I am making a new samba server. My old samba server was a RedHat machine (6.2) with samba 2.0.7 on it. My new samba server is a Gentoo machine with Samba 3.0.2a. Aside from the fact that I am now using ADS instead of a traditional NT4 domain -- everything else is the same. I am keeping all the shares the same, I have synced all the gid's and uid's between the two machines,

We have an ubuntu 14.04 server running samba 4.1.6 that is a member of our OLDDOMAIN. We recently added a new trusted domain to our forest. We noticed any new directories created by users in that new domain take a long time for the directory to list in the command line. This does not seem to happen when listing the directories with only user/group ID: root at

Hello friends, I am trying to test NAS I/O performance over a network and trying to see the numbers for write and read speed. I have successfully configured and ran a lot of tests. However the numbers have not increased, I have reached a bottleneck. I tried playing around with the smb.conf file including all possible variations like, socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=(tried values like

Well, let's try to be more precise about my issue and give some updates: I try to make a classicupgrade and meanwhile, change the Domain name during the process, which includes realm and NetBIOS domain name. I precisely meet difficulties with changing the NetBIOS domain name. What i've tried so far: 1) Change the NetBIOS domain name "workgroup" attribute on the old Samba 3

Hi, we currently run one samba v3.0 domain "DOMAIN30" with WinXP domain members and Win7/8 accessing the file server without domain membership. Then we run a second samba v3.5 domain "NEWDOMAIN" with WinXP/7/8 domain members. Which was migrated from a NT4 PDC to samba 3.0 and to v3.5 eventually. Neither domain has anything fancy about it: users and joined workstations,

We are migrating all of our users from the current domain to a new one we created. In this process we are moving them from roaming profiles to local. What would be the best practice to accomplish this? I can find plenty of writeups on how to do the opposite. Also we will be doing some extra folder redirection. Currently we only redirect their my documents to the server. On the new system we plan

Hi Rowland, Denis Thank you very much for your answers, It helped really a lot. And sorry for the delay of answer, was busy on other stuff. You advices don't lead me straight to the solution, but i get improvements, thanks to it. For now, whatever i can do to change the workgroup, It changes the Domain SID. Actually it's more subtle; Before change workgroup: #net getdomainsid

Hello everyone. I am using Samba 2.0.7 on a RedHat 6.2 machine. I wanted to apply a directory mask of 2770 to everything created in a share. The root directory of this share already has these permissions. I want to have it so that everything created in a certain directory has the permissions of the group of the creator. As it stands, I do have the directory mask = 2770 line in the smb.conf

On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 19:16:51 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Havany via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > >> It sounds like you are still using the old, deprecated (by Windows) > >> roaming profiles, instead of Folder redirection. > > ?! Some more clue, Rowland? I use roaming profiles *AND* folder >