similar to: Some smbd-processes uses 99% CPU and push load to 10

Hi, i have to set up a new server far away from home. At the central i have a Win 2008 native AD server with a samba AD member. Now i have to install a new server at an other location with a 1 Mbit/s connection. I don't know yet how reliable the connection will be. The users "faraway" should not need to manual authenticate to fileservers in the Central. What would you

Hello, i had to upgrade a server from 3.6 to 4.0.10. Now i have a problem had already i solved again. The problem is that a machines program is old and require dos filetime resolution = yes but i does not work with the new 4.0.10 [produktion] path=/home/filestore/produktion browseable = yes writable = yes # create mask = 0777 # directory mask = 0777 #

Hi, i have a problem upgrading an old samba 3.5.x to 4.0.9. The upgrade ends with: Setting password for administrator Administrator password has been set to password of user 'root' set_nt_acl_no_snum: fset_nt_acl returned NT_STATUS_INVALID_OWNER. ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - (-1073741734, 'NT_STATUS_INVALID_OWNER') File

Hello, i need some help. A samba3 (3.6.9-151.el6_4.1) ADS member (WIN 2008 AD Master) Server did his work for years. Since hours some Clients can not connect to the name (\\fileserver) connecting to \\192... sometimes work. Log say: 2013/10/09 09:54:27.735101, 3] smbd/sesssetup.c:660(reply_spnego_negotiate) reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob of size 1638 [2013/10/09 09:54:27.735423, 3]

Hi, i have a samba 4.0 server with bind DNS. I has two configured interfaces 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.2.1. The second nic is just for backup purposes i don't want it to be accessed by clients. At the moment samba dnsupdate push the .1.1 and the .2.1 address as server addresses. Windows clients in the 1.0/24 try to access 2.1 which does not work. How can i tell samba not to puch the second

Hello, i am using samba 4.0.8 with integrated DNS. Now i notice a wrong DNS entry of the PDC. ip addr (GGG for security ;-): br0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 inet6 2GGG:GGGG:GGGG:G::/64 scope global inet6 fe80::225:90ff:fe77:18e4/64 scope link # ./samba-tool dns query PDC GGGGGG.GGGGGG.local PDC AAAA Password for []: Name=, Records=1, Children=0 AAAA:

Hi, i learned a lot about cups, samba and printerdrivers the last few days and hours. I found a lot of mistakes but i can't change the following situation: I CAN NOT delete printjobs! I can connect to the printers, automatic download the driver, print, stop the printer, start the printer. Any tips, links, hints would be nice. My setup: Debian Sarge - Samba 3.0.14a - Cups 1.1.23. nss_ldap

Hello, I'm using Debian Sarge, Samba 3.0.14a and the stable cups included on the sarge dvds. And if I start the server and the printer in the same time on Monday morning I will get following error message in the /var/log/samba/log.smbd [2006/02/27 08:22:32, 0] printing/print_cups.c:cups_cache_reload(85) Unable to connect to CUPS server localhost - Connection refused [2006/02/27

Hi, some times users have problems to access shares. Some time later it works. I see smbd childs panic. Version 3.0.20b or 3.0.21a on Debian sarge + Openldap 2.3.13. I need HELP!!! Thanks Andreas Grabner I have found the following in the logs (sorry some lines) [2006/01/12 09:03:24, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:init_sam_from_ldap(640) init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: actur$ [2006/01/12

On 3/14/19 2:04 AM, Hiroshi Yamauchi wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:37 PM Fedor Sergeev <fedor.sergeev at azul.com > <mailto:fedor.sergeev at azul.com>> wrote: > >> >> - Add a new proxy ModuleAnalysisManagerLoopProxy for a loop pass >> to be able to get to the ModuleAnalysisManager in one step and >> PSI through it. >

Hi all, To implement more profile-guided optimizations, we’d like to use ProfileSummaryInfo (PSI) and BlockFrequencyInfo (BFI) from more passes of various types, under the new pass manager. The following is what we came up with. Would appreciate feedback. Thanks. Issue It’s not obvious (to me) how to best do this, given that we cannot request an outer-scope analysis result from an inner-scope

Overall seems fine to me. On 3/11/19 8:12 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi wrote: > Here's a revised approach based on the discussion: > > - Cache PSI right after the profile summary in the IR is written in > the pass pipeline. This would avoid the need to insert > RequireAnalysisPass for PSI before each non-module pass that needs it. > PSI can be technically invalidated but unlikely

On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 12:58 AM Fedor Sergeev <fedor.sergeev at azul.com> wrote: > > > On 3/2/19 2:38 AM, Hiroshi Yamauchi wrote: > > Here's a sketch of the proposed approach for just one pass (but imagine > more) > > https://reviews.llvm.org/D58845 > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 12:54 PM Fedor Sergeev via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>

On 3/4/19 10:49 PM, Hiroshi Yamauchi wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:55 AM Hiroshi Yamauchi <yamauchi at google.com > <mailto:yamauchi at google.com>> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 2, 2019 at 12:58 AM Fedor Sergeev > <fedor.sergeev at azul.com <mailto:fedor.sergeev at azul.com>> wrote: > > > > On 3/2/19 2:38 AM,

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > Given I didn't get any response to my original query, I chose not to invest > time in this at the time. I am unlikely to get time for this in the near > future. > > On 12/07/2015 03:13 PM, Easwaran Raman wrote: > > (Resending after removing llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu and using >

Here's a sketch of the proposed approach for just one pass (but imagine more) https://reviews.llvm.org/D58845 On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 12:54 PM Fedor Sergeev via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 2/28/19 12:47 AM, Hiroshi Yamauchi via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi all, > > To implement more profile-guided optimizations, we’d like to use > ProfileSummaryInfo

> On 2015-Jun-04, at 12:45, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith <dexonsmith at apple.com> wrote: > >> On 2015-Jun-04, at 12:28, Ivan Baev <ibaev at codeaurora.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, we got the following assert: >> >> assert(!Working[0].isLoopHeader() && "entry block is a loop header"); >> >> [in

Good evening, guys! At first, I apologize my report is a little gross, I have so little time to do checking process minutely. * RC1 RC1 can be built on VS8, 9, 10 with Debug|Release. At one point, r127264(in release_29/trunk) is needed to build with Debug on VS10. RC1 can pass clang-test with any configurations. RC1 fails llvm's check on many tests. * RC1 and patches ToT would be ready

(Resending after removing llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu and using llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org) On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Easwaran Raman <eraman at google.com> wrote: > Hi Philip, > > Is there any update on this? I've been sending patches to get rid of the > callee hotness based inline hints from the frontend and move the logic to > the inliner. The next step is to use

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Philip Reames <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: > > > On 12/10/2015 04:29 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Philip Reames >> <listmail at philipreames.com> wrote: >>> >>> Given I didn't get any response to my original query, I chose not to >>> invest