similar to: Samba/win2k ??

What about this: How can I set a parameter (valid user) in the shared folder (smb.conf) in order to it can authenticate the users in the PDC? because I can only do this with the Linux users. Thanks in advance Leonardo

Hello, Please forgive my ignorance if this is a old topic or is a easy, I am rather new to these stuffs. I have Samba running and authenticating properly in our Organization as a PDC. Now if I wanted a Windows 2000 server as a BDC for that domain, it that possible (samba 2.2 or 3). I know the 3 alpha supports active directory. The Windows 2000 server will be a BDC for the Samba PDC. If

R 1.6.2 for Windows, Win2k: I have fitted a weighted least squares model using the code "wls.out <- gls(y ~ x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 + x5 + x6 - 1, data = foo.frame, weights = varConstPower(form = ~ fitted(.), fixed = list(power = 0.5), const = 1))" The data has 62 rows and the response is zero when the covariates are zero. The purpose of the model was to account for the the fact that

Can someone help with a fairly simple task? I have a data set where I would like to insert a 0 time event between individuals: what I have: VAR DATE TIME CONC COVAR 1 NOV2 0.25 10 group1 1 NOV2 0.5 20 group1 1 NOV2 1 5 group1 1 NOV2 2 1 group1 1 NOV2 3 0.1 group1 2 NOV2 0.25 10

We replaced our Win2k PDC with a Samba PDC and have all Windows clients are connecting. But we are having difficulty logging on with the Linux and Unix servers to this domain. Is there something that must be done differently for them to connect?

Hi All, Is there a simple way to convert a string such as c("A", "B" ,"C", "D") to a string of c("Group1", "Group1", "Group2", "Group2"). Naturally I could use the factor function as below but I don't like seeing that warning message (and I don't want to turn off warning messages). Perhaps a function

Hello! I am aggregating using a formula in aggregate - of the type: aggregate(cbind(var1,var2,var3)~factor1+factor2,sum,data=mydata) However, I actually have an object (vector of my variables to be aggregated): myvars<-c("var1","var2","var3") I'd like my aggregate formula (its "cbind" part) to be able to use my "myvars" object. Is it

Hi- I am experiencing some odd behavior with ACLs with winbindd using Samba 2.6 on Debian Woody (kernel version 2.4.18). 1. I am unable to alter permissions from Win2K clients using the Properties->Security interface. Is this normal? I get the "Unable to save Permission Changes on new Folder. Access is denied." message. This occurs with all accounts, both privileged and

Hello! I have my data frame "mydata" (below) and data frame "reference" - that contains all the dates I would like to be present in the final data frame. I am trying to merge them so that the the result data frame contains all 8 dates in both subgroups (i.e., Group1 should have 8 rows and Group2 too). But when I merge it it's not coming out this way. Any hint would be

Full_Name: Martha Nason Version: 2.0.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (137.187.154.154) I am running simulations using fisher's test on 2 x c tables and a very small p.value from fisher's test (<2.2e-16) is returned as a negative number. Code follows. > set.seed(0) > nreps.outer <-7 > pvalue.fisher <- rep(NA,nreps.outer) > > population1 <- c(

Dear all, I'm performing a t-test on two normal distributions with identical mean & standard deviation, and repeating this tests a very large number of times to describe an representative p value distribution in a null case. As a part of this, the program bins these values in 10 evenly distributed bins between 0 and 1 and reports the number of observations in each bin. What I have noticed

Hello All, I have posted to this list before regarding the same issue so I apologize for the multiple e-mails. I am still struggling with this issue so I thought I'd give it another try. This time I have included reproducible code and a subset of the data I am analyzing. I am running an ANOVA with three factors: GROUP (5 levels), FEATURE (2 levels), and PATIENT (2 levels), where

Hi all Assume I have a data set xx; Group: 1=group1 ?, 2=group2 IQ: ?1= High, 0 =low fit <- glm(IQ ~group, data = xx, family = binomial()) summary(fit) Results ?????? ????????????Estimate Std. Error z value Pr(>|z|) (Intercept) -2.55456??? 0.210 -12.273? < 5e-16 *** group????????? 0.36180 ?????0.076?? 3.952 ????5.24e-05 *** the odd ratio = exp(0.36180 )= 1.435912 My question

Hi, To pretty print aggregates by various dimensions I needed to add a empty row in output of aggregate. For example. d<-(aggregate(data[,cbind("x")], by=list(data$group1,data$group2), sum)) Group.1 Group.2 x 1 A N 3 2 A Y 2 3 B N 420164905 Is there a way to add an empty

Hi all, I would like to transform to long format a matrix which has only information about individuals and a value for each individual. I would like to have it in ling format with more information related to groups, so ell values and individuals are repeated for each group. Let me show the example: matrix in wide format: Individuals Value A 3 B 4 C 5 D 2 And long format would

Hello. Im hoping someone can help with a grouping question related to the "random=" statement within the nlme function. How do you specify that some grouping levels are inner to others? I tried several things, given below. Lets say I have a data frame with five variables, resp, cov1, ran1, ran2, group1, and group 2. The formula is resp~cov1 + ran1 + ran2, where the ran are random

Dear list, I would like to do some calculation using different grouping variables. My 'df' looks like this: # Some data set.seed(345) id <- seq(200,400, by=10) ids <- sample(substr(id,1,1)) group1 <- rep(1:3, each=7) group2 <- rep(1:2, c(10,11)) group3 <- rep(1:4, c(5,5,5,6)) df <- data.frame(id, ids, group1, group2, group3) df <- rbind(df, df, df) df$time <-

Hi all, I have a (simple?) question about groups. this is my scenario: Windows Active directory domain Samba file server ADS integrated 2 shares on this last server (share1, share2) 2 groups on the AD (group1 and group2) First share is only fully available to group1: this is easily done second share is fully available to group2 --- Then I have some users belonging to both group1 and

Hello, I'm Oliver and I need help for a experiment. I have a sharing with Samba version 3.2.5, my distribution Linux is Debian(Lenny) and the acl version is 2.2.47. Below my configurations files: #/etc/fstab /dev/sda3 /shared reiserfs defaults,acl 0 1 #smb.conf [data] comment = files path = /shared inherit acls = yes inherit permissions = yes map acl inherit = Yes #

Hi, Could someone please tell me how to perform a Mann-Whitney U test on a dataset with 2 groups where one group has more data values than another? I have split up my 2 groups into 2 columns in my .txt file i'm using with R. Here is the code i have so far... group1 <- c(LeafArea2) group2 <- c(LeafArea1) wilcox.test(group1, group2) This code works for datasets with the same number