similar to: ext3 on 2.4.4

Dear Sezer, On 07/12/2011 10:37 PM, 7x24 WEB SERVICES wrote: > > My name is Sezer DEGE and I own a web hosting company. > > I come through the CentOS 6 release notes web page. > > http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.0 > > I'd like contribute by translating this to Turkish language if its needed. > > Could you please lead me how can I do this? >

Having had various issues with local vendor (begins with "V"). am looking to move to all wireless. Anyone know if current vendor can refuse to port the current land line numbers to a wireless provider? >From what I've read, the Fed's seem to say "no", they cannot refuse, or impede this. joe a.

I plan on using ext3 on a Hardware RAID5 drive. Linux will be seeing this drive as 170GB drive. Has anyone had any problems with ext3 on a drive this large? Also, how large should I make the journal file upon creation? Thanks -Rob

For some reason I'm getting Access denied errors when I try to execute a .bat file that resides on a samba share (from a Win95 command prompt). The drive is mapped as x:\ & for the sake of testing, the directory has been recursively set to 777 (chmod). Command prompt output: x:\> x:\r235\src\ntprpst\sharc\mta\src\build_sharc_fta.bat Access denied -

I'm trying to build samba with ldap/ads support on a solaris10 sparc system. After some googling, I followed some the advise of others, and built krb5, openssl, and openldap and installed into /usr/local. When running configure, I get errors about ldap not being found: ... checking for LDAP support... yes checking ldap.h usability... yes checking ldap.h presence... yes checking for

Hi, I've had some issues with rsync over ssh with version 2.4.4 which an update to 2.4.6 fixed. The problem I have now is that machines which do not have a valid reverse dns entry for their IP addresses get empty directory listings from the server, even though they can get the module list and the motd each time. This is what I see in the server's log file for each attempt from such hosts

On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com>wrote: > Hi all, > > We'd like to promote the AArch64 backend to being built by default. I > know it's very soon after the initial upload, but we think the backend > is in a good position and should be stable. > > We'd very much like to get it tested in more diverse environments >

On 31 January 2013 12:45, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote: > This to me says that the concerns and protections of the experimental > backend aren't needed, and are more likely to impede progress than help it > -- specifically, we won't get good build bot coverage and diverse host > compiler coverage until it's enabled. > +1 --renato

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 3:38 PM Warren Young <warren at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:01 PM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > > > I have yet to see software RAID that doesn't kill the performance. > > When was the last time you tried it? > > Why would you expect that a modern 8-core Intel CPU would impede I/O in > any measureable way as

All, I know that there is no official port to Kernel 2.4.4, thus I may not get any help, however I am hoping someone could point me in the right direction for my problem. I am currently forced to use kernel 2.4.4 for reasons out of my control (embedded board). Here are the exact versions of everything I'm running: ExT3 Version: ext3-2.4-0.9.6-248 Util Version: util-linux-2.11f.tar.bz2 e2fs

For some odd reason, I'm getting some off the wall occurances with a ext3 partition. During a normal reboot: /dev/sdb1 has reached maximal mount count, check forced. Is this normal? I thought JFS's were supposed to alleviate this check, or is that just for fs corruption? Here's my sys info: Linux 2.2.19 running Redhat 6.2 EXT3 is only on /dev/sdb1, mounted as /mnt/raid /dev/sdb1

Dear List, I am wanting to perform some traffic shaping as the subject of this email suggests. What I am wanting to do is this; I would like to have traffic shaping performed on the following protocols: HTTP, RDP, GRE, PPTP, SIP and IAX. Obviously I would like to have highest priority set for voice packets so much so that the general http traffic does not impede on the voice packets. I

> I've tried changing how I symbolically linked the mailboxes, i.e., > creating a sub-directory that is symlinked into the user's mail/ > directory versus symbolically linking the mbox files themselves, etc. > No dice. Permissions are fine. I've even resorted to changing the > index locking strategy, to no avail. I've tested my setup by symlinking both folders and

Hello, I have a dataframe containing various time series (not time series objects though!)with hourly time steps. I?d like to perform ccf for I need to know the correlation factors for different lags. Here is an example: x<-as.POSIXct(c("2008-12-25 16:00:00", "2008-12-25 17:00:00", "2008-12-25 18:00:00", "2008-12-25 19:00:00", "2008-12-25

On Wed, 2020-11-11 at 16:38 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > On Nov 11, 2020, at 2:01 PM, hw <hw at gc-24.de> wrote: > > I have yet to see software RAID that doesn't kill the performance. > > When was the last time you tried it? I'm currently using it, and the performance sucks. Perhaps it's not the software itself or the CPU but the on-board controllers or other

Hello, Sir. My name is Hiroyuki Kudo. I have a problem using ext3 in my system DELL PowerEdge 1550. I recently installed RedHat 7.2 (kernel-2.4.7-2) and found that it used ext3. Later, since I needed to use nfsv4, I got kernel-2.4.4-nfsv4. But it didn't start up and saying `kernel panic` What is wrong with it? If the problem can be cleared with ext3-patch, how can I do it?

Hi Daniel, Disclaimer: Haven't read the proposal yet. > TL;DR: We're planning to define GlobalISel Combine Rules using MIR syntax with a few bits glued on to interface with the algorithm and escape into C++ when we need to. Eventually, ISel rules may follow suit. I would rather avoid adding a dependency on yet another tablegen backend to the project unless we are confident it is

I'm trying to build a custom RPM with a standalone Python 2.4.4 in the /opt directory to keep it isolated from the stock version of Python in CentOS 4.4. The end goal is to use it in conjunction with yet-to-be-built RPMS of the current versions of Zope and Plone. The spec file I've constructed allows me to build a RPM successfully, but when I try to install the RPM, it complains: error:

Hi, I would like to know whether Icecast version 2.4.4 supports IPV6 listener connections? I have some mobile phone users that connect to my web server with an IPV6 address but then connect to the Icecast server via IPV4. I assume that IPV6 is supported in version 2.5, but I am not able to upgrade to that version just yet. If it is supported in version 2.4.4, can anyone refer to me to

Hello Does anybody know that Linux kernel 2.4.4 supports ext3 fs (module or embedded). I looked at the config menus, but I couldn't see ext3 support. I don't know whether the other ext3 modules work under a kernel which does not support ext3. I will try to insmod ext3 modules. I'm searching and trying newly built kernels. Any help or comments are welcome. Best regards Ardaulas