similar to: ACL + XFS + SAMBA 3.0.4 + OpenLdap + PDC - permissions problem

Hi guys, I've got a problem where if I set permissions on a folder(Admin) "setfacl -R -d -m u::rwx,g::wrx,o::- Admin/" and "setfacl -m o:- Admin" I get the following. mail:/data/samba/shared # getfacl Admin/ # file: Admin # owner: BCP+administrator # group: samba user::rwx user:samba:rwx group::rwx group:BCP+admin:r-x mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx

Dear All I am facing a strange problem that I could not solve, so, maybe you can help me. Look at this situation: I created a new directory with those ACLs (through Samba using Windows XP) [root@server /home/smb/adm]# getfacl teste #file:teste #owner:1002 #group:1006 user::rwx group::rwx group:suporte:rwx group:administ:rwx mask::rwx other::--- [root@server /home/smb/adm]# getfacl -d teste

Hi i have a question concerning the acl supoprt of samba, i have a mandrake9 (2.4.19) with a xfs partition installed locally i can get and set acls on the xfs parition snip [root@aclsmb data]# getfacl samba/ # file: samba # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::r-x other::r-x [root@aclsmb data]# setfacl -m u:smalchow:rwx samba/ [root@aclsmb data]# getfacl samba/ # file: samba # owner:

When a directory has a default ACL and a subdirectory is created under that directory, btrfs_init_acl() is called when the subdirectory''s inode is created to initialize the inode''s ACL (inherited from the parent directory) but it was clearing the ACL from the inode after setting it if posix_acl_create() returned success, instead of clearing it only if it returned an error. To

A bit of a minor off-topic issue, but on the off-chance that someone understands how ACLs work ... I've been trying to see if using default ACLs would help with the following issue: I have a third party application that is running as a non-root user ('user-a') and creating log files with mode 0600 (read/write only to the owner) in a log directory I have another application that

> > On the file serever: > > Collected config --- 2019-07-03-10:27 ----------- > > > > Hostname: srv > > DNS Domain: a.b.hu > > FQDN: srv.a.b.hu > > ipaddress: 10.0.3.15 192.168.0.8 > > ----------- > > Samba is running as a Unix domain member > > ----------- > > > > This computer is running Debian 10.0 x86_64 > >

Hello, we are using the vfs module recycle with the following config: vfs objects = recycle recycle: repository = .Papierkorb recycle:directory_mode = 0777 recycle:subdir_mode = 0777 recycle: keeptree = Yes recycle: exclude = *.tmp, *.temp, *.log, *.ldb recycle: exclude_dir = tmp recycle:versions = Yes Problem is that everybody can see deleted documents in the recycle bin. But if I set

Hi, all. I compiled Samba 2.2.5 (on Linux) with these optinos: --with-smbmount --with-acl-support --with-ldapsam The compilation went fine and everything seems to be working except for the ACL part. I've applied the ACL patch for Linux 2.4.18 (from acl.bestbits.at) and installed all the tools to go with it. That part works: root@madrid# getfacl /tmp getfacl:

> >>>> Run this : getfacl /home/users > >>> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names > >>> # file: home/users > >>> # owner: root > >>> # group: A\\domain\040admins > >>> user::rwx > >>> user:root:rwx > >>> user:10512:rwx > >>> group::rwx > >>>

Hello, I am running Fedora Core 2. Kernel: linux-2.6.5-1.358 Kernel supports ACL: [root@atlas configs]# grep FS_SECURITY kernel-2.6.5-i686-smp.config CONFIG_EXT2_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_XFS_SECURITY=y CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_SECURITY=y [root@atlas configs]# grep XATTR kernel-2.6.5-i686-smp.config CONFIG_EXT2_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR=y CONFIG_DEVPTS_FS_XATTR=y Have

I have an issue with W2K/XP using Folder Redirection to a Samba homes share (or any share for that matter). This is only a problem when access for a user is via an ACE (ACL) and not the traditional file system permissions. So for example (user is cath in this example): [root@gandalf users]# ll -d cath drwxrwx---+ 5 root root 4096 Apr 15 20:40 cath [root@gandalf users]# getfacl cath # file: cath

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 1:17 PM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:25:32 +0200 > Neil <nwilson123 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Rowland, > > > > Thank you for the reply and info. > > > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> > > wrote: > > >

Hi all, Sorry to repost about this same issue once again, but I'm really at a complete loss as to how to solve the problem with ownership being changed after I've set it. I've set ownership as follows... ( set this by chmod -R 0770 HR, as well as chgroup -R HR-Group, I then signed into a Windows PC that was part of the domain, went to computer management as per the WIKI and chose

Hi Rowland, sorry, I hit the wrong reply button in the last answer. So there is no other way than to use Windows ACLs? I was told with our old systems (Samba 3 in non-domain mode) the behaviour I want to achieve was possible when only using ugo. Greetings, Felix -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Im Auftrag von Rowland Penny Gesendet:

Finally biting the bullet and upgrading home machines to Windows 7 but experiencing many problems. Server is a Debian Lenny, old Samba 3.2.5, new Samba 4.1.4 built from source. My setup has been doing roaming profiles for XP since 2003 or so with almost no changes. I want to keep roaming profiles going plus do some folder redirection (Desktop (my wife doesn't believe in file shares for

Wonder if someone can point me in the right direction here - just built some new bricks running gluster 3.4 alpha 3 (from http://download.gluster.org) with the objective of testing them to replace some existing 3.2 systems in production. The main thing I was after was NFS ACL support, however on getting everything setup, I still don't seem to be able to see POSIX extended ACLs on the

Hello, I've setup a samba PDC (3.0.31) and I am using Windows Vista clients. Logging on works fine using roaming profiles and folder redirections. I am also able to write to shares, etc. Now I am trying to get the advanced permissions on files to work. So on my share: [share] comment = Shared directories path = /samba/share read only = No guest ok = Yes With the following user rights

Hi, I already wrote about this subject last month but didn't get attention... I've found a way to transfert acls with a script and applying them. This process has already been described in this mailing list (http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/rsync/2000-March/001992.html) but there's a way to do it in a more efficient way using some getfacl options. You can dump acls of a full

Hi there, finally all seems to be working. Samba 3 as PDC with LDAP Backend. Even ACLs are possible with the command line tool setfacl. These ACLs work fine in Samba and are displayed correctly in the Windows filemanager in the security-tab. But one thing remains unsolved: why can't I set those ACLs directly from my Windows client machine? If I try to modify the ACL I always get a message

Le 05/09/2016 à 10:23, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 09:38:56 +0200 > Sam via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> If I try to set acl under windows, something very strange appears. >> >> For instance, if I set something for the user samuel I get this with >> the command getfacl : >>