similar to: Win98 Network File Caching?

Hey all, Our scenario is hopefully quite simple. A client has a MS Small Business Server and about 6-8 Win98 clients. There are also two SCO v5 boxes, which are running samba 2.0.3 (the precompiled version). From the NT box, we can see the SCO servers, but from the Win98 boxes, the SCO servers are not visible. Samba is configured to register its name with the NT WINS server, and I'd

From: Dag Wieers > Sorry to interrupt but he was describing how you appeared in previous > postings. And I have to say that I felt the same way reading some of your postings. Really? Then I'll re-read them since there's been a second confirmation. Just know that I wasn't trying to make it about good/bad. I'm just trying to make the point that companies aren't just

I have several SCO UNIX system were I would like to install Samba. Some of these machines are running SCO 5.0.7 which comes with a Samba version 2.2, the other machines running SCO 5.0.6 do not have Samba. I would like to upgrade the Samba to V.3 on the newer machines and to be able to install it on the older systems, but I am unable to find out a download from Samba.org for SCO. Could some one

I've installed Samba ("latest") on SCO's openserver 5 with a WIN'95 hanging off of it as a client. I can run every test in DIAGNOSI.txt except for number 2. That is, the WIN'95 box can not ping the SCO box within a reasonable amount of time. (SCO can ping the WIN'95 box fine). For the longest time I thought the WIN'95 box couldn't ping the SCO box but I

For those of you following the IBM vs SCO legal case, you have probably noticed that SCO has said that the GPL is invalid. IBM appears to make the reasonable case that you can't say something is void, and then rely on it. INAL, but why is SCO allowed to distribute Samba without agreeing to the GPL? That's like buying a car, then claiming the sale agreement is bogus but you still want

Yo Andrew! What version of Openssh are you trying? RGDS GARY On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Andrew McGill wrote: > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 15:26:53 +0200 > From: Andrew McGill <andrewm at datrix.co.za> > To: djm at ibs.com.au > Cc: gem at rellim.com > Subject: Openssh on SCO Openserver Release 5 > > Hi there > > Your e-mail address appears in the README for openssh,

Yo All! Sorry if this is obvious but I am new to openssh. I have used the original ssh for a while and am familiar with it (and it's restrictive license). I am trying to port openssh-1.2.1pre24 on to SCO UnixWare 7.1.0. I will post the small patches when it is really running. Two problems, SCO has no /dev/random so I installed egd-0.6. It usually works but sometimes dies. I have sent

I think what I need is a prebuilt package. I currently use Samba 2.2.12 running on SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 but I am in the process of upgrading to 5.0.7. Can't move to SCO version 6 because our application isn't guaranteed to work on it. Regards Dave -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Mauricio Tavares

I am using a SCO Unix system version 2.1.2 where I develop some application. This SCO Unix system is connected to a TCP/IP network. On the same segment also a NT 4.0 server is running. This NT server makes each day a backup of some directories on the NT server. what I want to realise is, make a NFS directory on the SCO unix server pointed to the NT server. So that the applications developed on

openssh-2.9.9p2/configure.in says: # Disabled until it works on SCO and HPUX #AC_SYS_LARGEFILE As an autoconf maintainer I'd like to fix this. Can you please explain what's broken on SCO and HPUX? I'm puzzled by the comment, as AC_SYS_LARGEFILE is a feature introduced in autoconf 2.50, whereas openssh-2.9.9p2/configure was built with autoconf 2.13. Anyway, some older GNU

Dears Sirs; I'm tryng to compile and install samba 3.0.14a on a SCO Openserver 5.0.6 server (i want to use some shared printers from MS server2003 on a customer network, but with samba SCO ver 2.2, i can't obtain the authorization from the domain controller to use shared resources), but i'm havig a lot of trouble. I had dowloaded samba-3.0.14a.tar.gz fro Samba.org. I had put all the

Hello Mark, Did you ever solve this problem? I saw your post but no replies. I'm in the exact same situation. If you have any pointers on where to get this I'd appreciate it. - Paul Hess >From: "Mark Mestdagh" <mestdagh@dma.be> >To: "samba digest" <samba@samba.anu.edu.au> >Subject: TCP/IP >Date: Thu, 26 Mar 1998 21:40:59

If you upgrade to sco 5.0.7, you get samba 3.0.20 5.0.6 had samba 3.0.14. so im wondering why your using samba 2.2.. samba 3.0x. is on the supplimental discs. Gr. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: dave at anchor-tech.co.uk >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens David Nolan >Verzonden: vrijdag 22 mei 2015 14:12 >Aan: 'Mauricio Tavares' >CC:

There was a patch merged in on 9/29 that changed remove() calls to unlink(): - (djm) Merged big SCO portability patch from Tim Rice <tim at multitalents.net> Does SCO's libc not include remove()? Note that sftp-server.c is currently using remove. The reason I ask is I'd like to keep the portable tree as close to openbsd as possible, and if we need remove() for SCO we should

First let me introduce myself to all the list. My name is Josep and I live near Barcelona. This is my first message to the list (I haven't even read any), and I do not know if it is too easy (my question), or if perhaps it is not possible to do what I'm trying to do. Well, let's begin the interesting stuff and finish all the bla-bla-bla's that most people hate :-D I've

Has anyone here installed samba on sco? I might have to install samba on a SCO 3.2 v 5.0.5 server and was wondering if there might be any complications, I'm used to freebsd so I'm not sure what I'm in for.

Hi, I've just installed a binary version of Samba 2.0.3 on SCO 5.0.5 and am having some problems. I'm basically following "SAMS Teach yourself Samba in 24 hrs" book. On a Win98 machine I can see the SCO machine in the Network Neighborhood. When I try to connect it asks for a passwd and says that the passwd is incorrect when I enter it. It also displays

SCO Unix 3.2v4.2 Samba 1.9.18p3 Problem with I_STR/SIOCGIFCONF I haven't a clue what is wrong here... We compiled samba 1.9.18p3 using GCC and everything is working pretty much okay. However, when we start the nmbd server we get an error message: > 03/22/1998 10:19:15 netbios nameserver version 1.9.18p3 started > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1997 > doing parameter log level = 3

I am trying to assist a client who need a compiled version of Samba 1.9 for his SCO ODT 3.2 v4.2 environment. We are trying to connect an old version of DataFlex on SCO and need the bridge. Anybody have an old compiled version? Thanks Paul Davis Sr. Business Development Manager CONNX Solutions - www.connx.com<http://www.connx.com/> Direct - (425) 519-6670 Mobile - (425) 269-3956

I apologize if this has been addressed before; recently I read an article in Forbes which discussed how SCO was going after companies that have been using Linux. The article made the point that the ideas behind GPL are under attack precisely because no one is making sure that the code being put into the freely avail. packages isn't owned by someone else. Here's my question: Is R