similar to: CIFS/9000 or Samba migration

Hi all, I encounter a problem when I try to connect a Samba3 server as a BDC on a ASU HP/9000 PDC server. We manage to start the communication between both computers, but it doesn't achieve it. It failed when trying to bind to PIPE\lsarpc. Can anyone give some help please ? Let's note that I can get the SID from net getlocalsid command, and that I can list all share with administrator

>From: "ulairi" <ulairi@jps.net> >HP, in their own inimitable way, will release the product as "CIFS/9000". >More then likely, it will be a replacement (or a more advanced version) of >their ASU/9000 LanMan product (Advanced Server for Unix). >Having had to play with ASU/9000 and HP's all-time favorite game of "oh, you >need a patch, but for

Hi team, I actually managed to join AS/U (version 4.0 on AIX) into a domain, with a Samba PDC. Samba tells me that the AS/U server is a member, but there is still some failing dialog between AS/U and Samba. For instance, I can't access to AS/U's shares, it seems that I fall into a timeout, and more presumably a schannel error (even increasing log level gives me few informations...).

OK we talked about this a while ago, here's a summary and some proposals: At the moment, virtio PCI uses IO BARs for all accesses. The reason for IO use is the cost of different VM exit types of transactions and their emulation on KVM on x86 (it would be trivial to use memory BARs on non x86 platforms if they don't have PIO). Example benchmark (cycles per transaction): (io access) outw

OK we talked about this a while ago, here's a summary and some proposals: At the moment, virtio PCI uses IO BARs for all accesses. The reason for IO use is the cost of different VM exit types of transactions and their emulation on KVM on x86 (it would be trivial to use memory BARs on non x86 platforms if they don't have PIO). Example benchmark (cycles per transaction): (io access) outw

Hi all, As part of IPv6 version specific classification support in crossbow we are introducing ip_version option in flowadm interface and associated classification functions. If ip_version option is not specified, but v4 or v6 address is passed as arg. to ip_addr option of flowadm cli that can also help to populate version specific bits in flow_mask to specify if policy (and flow entry

Hi everyone, I could have posted this on R-devel or the GUI list, however don't feel it's that serious. Hence, decided R-help would be the most appropriate. I'm not so much interested in which is the best user interface for R. Rather which is the best ***platform*** for developing ***new*** user interfaces for R. Noting I'm using the term user interface is a very general sense.

I know this thread has been discussed before, but I have run into this problem and would like to re-open it... I have come to a point in my project where I need to provide an import/export feature for Active Records. Since a user could export off one system and import onto another auto-increment integers will not work (collisions on ids due to lack of uniquness). Listed below is an initial list

Hi team, I'm running samba 3.0.4 on AIX 4.3.3 and HP-UX 11.00 without any problems except the following : On HP-UX 11.00, when I try to join a machine to a domain, it first insert all POSIX entries in the LDAP backend but rejects the junction. The machine account could not be found. Waiting for a while and relaunching the join command, the junction just works fine. Having exactly the same

Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: > >> I should have asked a better question. By "does it work" I meant something >> like >> >> for (int i = 0; i < a.length; i++) >> System.out.println(a[i]); >> >> > > OK, so no :) VMKit does not know that a[i] is related to a.length. I > believe Andre's

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Good day all, I am running CIFS/9000 (which is based on Samba 3.0.22 with, I'm guessing, security and serious bug fixes through 3.0.25 -- it's not all that clear), and running all of this on an HP-UX 11.11 PA-RISC server. The problem I have is when I do a right-click on a mapped printer and ask for the properties, my connected daemon

Hi Everyone, I would like to implement GCC ifunc attribute support in Clang and LLVM. At the moment Clang ignores the attribute with a warning. On LLVM IR level there is no support for ifunc. But there is some support for ELF symbol type `@gnu_indirect_function` in ELF reader/writer/target asm parser. This RFC is looking for thoughts and suggestions about representation of ifunc in LLVM IR.

All, I have a question on how to deal with a quirk of the Intel Boot Agent. Both for PXE boots and for EFI boots. I've noticed this IBA quirk for years. According to the "DHCP options" RFC, variable length DHCP options are not necessarily null-terminated. Here's the details: >From DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2132#section-2)

Hello Everyone, Does anyone have any insight into the DWR library (http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/index)? I want to know the pros/cons of using DWR Vs Prototype/Scriptaculous libraries. I am a great fan of the prototype/scriptaculous combination and have been working with them for the last 3-4 months but for some reasons I have been asked to look into DWR. Due to it''s tight integration

Hi Andre? Andre Tavares wrote: > Thanks for all answers. I will consider them all before I start coding. > > I have another discussion that I would like to hear from you. > > I can implement SSI in two different ways. Analysis or Transformation Pass. > > As an Analysis Pass, I would create a SSI LiveInterval, mapping each > interval with a constraint. > Pros: No change

I have a huge UNIX network. I want to deploy a Samba server using NIS Authentication mechanism for the growing number of windows machines. What are the pros and cons of using NIS authentication with Samba? Also any pointer/docs in setting up Samba with NIS Authentication. I am pretty much familiar in setting up Samba using the default smbpasswd authentication. Thanks in advance

Please help me persuade IT to install R on my computer! All suggestions welcome. Our IT department run scared when you mention software that they have no working experience of. I need to know the pros and cons of having R on corporate desktops. Please no funny stuff, this is quite a serious issue for us. Pros and cons would be good. Thanks. -- View this message in context:

Whoops, wrong recipient. On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 05:54:28PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > I'm currently thinking about which version of Xen supporting in Squeeze. > There are two possibilities: 3.4 and 4.0. 3.4 is currently in testing > and unstable, 4.0 is in experimental. > > Xen 3.4 > ======= > Pros > - Proofed to be stable > Cons > - NUMA-mode only opt-in,

Hi: Can anybody point me to some guidelines about SMB network design or give some advice? Samba HOWTOs are very detailed recipes, but I need some general tips, like if we are serving fish or pasta tonight :-) This is the situation: a WAN with 20 offices with 2 to 30 people in each, plus a headquarter with 50 people, plus the databases and central file servers. The organization grew up on a NT4

Hi All We use CentOS 6.6 for our application. I have profiled the application and find that we have a heavy requirement in terms of Disk writes. On an average when our application operates at a certain load i can observe that the disk writes / second is around 2 Mbps (Average). The block size set is 4k ******************* [root at localhost ~]# blockdev --getbsz /dev/sda3 4096