similar to: Directory listing delay with WinXP and IPtables

Before wasting a lot of time going at this in the wrong list, I would like to confirm whether my thinking is on or off base with respect to source and destination ports. Samba is being blocked by fw2loc even though I have accept rules set up. I believe I can explain why, but I could be wrong. I think that for some reason, samba is sourcing stuff on the commonly used port 137, but trying to send

I have an XP home (falcon) and an XP pro (tatooine) machine, both behind a rh9 box (hoth) acting as firewall. I've been trying to get samba set up on the linux box. I think I have it mostly working except that the XP boxes won't list hoth under "My Network Places - Microsoft Windows Network - MSHOME", and I cannot access hoth by name at all from the XP-pro box (by IP, I can

Dear netters, My linux box is installed with samba 3.0.0 and joined with NT domain (w2k based). Samba are working fine, until I filter the incoming traffic using iptables (v1.2.7a) on default RedHat 9 kernel 2.4.20-8, using these rules: [root@Bhp-0m03-0472 root]# cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables # Generated by iptables-save v1.2.7a on Sun Oct 12 19:36:36 2003 *filter :INPUT DROP [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT

i got this problem, i want to shape my clients internet bw, but i don''t want to shape my local network traffic. For information, my clients using wireless to connect to my router[192.168.1.254]. when the clients request data from internet, example download from www.download.com, i want to shape his bandwidth, but when the clients [192.168.1.1] want to download from my file server example

Hi, I have a big "name problem" with my internal mail server (10.0.0.152). It is "seen" on the internet through DNAT (213.58.230.27). Also there is a MX record pointing to the machine. Everything works fine from the outside. However i can''t set the mail clients on the lan pointing to the mx record, because this one points to 213.58.230.27 and the firewall

I''m attempting to setup Squid as shown on: http://shorewall.sourceforge.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html#DMZ The firewall is a Bering 1.0 firewall running Shorewall 1.3.11, Red Hat 7.2 on the server in the DMZ. I''m not seeing the requests come in to the server using tcpdump. The server is 192.168.2.1 connecting to eth2 on the firewall, the local traffic I''m trying to

I have problem getting answer on http request from all my local subnets but not from local subnet. Ping and requests on ports 21 22 23 25 110 works fine. I logged port 80 in rules files and I got accept entry same for local subnet and other subnets. Local subnet is 192.168.6 Dec 29 09:52:40 zinfsrv2 kernel: Shorewall:loc2fw:ACCEPT:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:09:6b:07:ca:cc:00:10:b5:fa:bd:71:08:00

Hi, Trying to figure out why I cannot get access to dell.com Their site is up because I can browse using a different firewall. Trying to find out where the logs are located and what log files it would write to if it were to deny browsing to a website. I can see the [UNREPLIED] when using the shorewall status. Was hoping to know what logfile it is writing it to. Thanks in advance, Elmer

Can you post your Tinc configuration too? El lun., 30 ene. 2017 a las 11:42, Dave Albert (<dave.albert at gmail.com>) escribió: > Here is an extract of my current iptables that are not working: > > iptables -L -n -v > > Chain INPUT (policy DROP 8 packets, 1120 bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source > destination > 0 0

Hi, I'm trying to configure nwfilter for KVM, but so far I haven't managed to figure out a working configuration. Network setup: The dom0 (Debian 7.1, kernel 3.2.46-1, libvirt 0.9.12) is connected via eth0, part of the external subnet 192.168.17.0/24, and has an additional subnet 192.168.128.160/28 routed to its main address 192.168.17.125. The host's subnet is configured as bridge

Hey, I was originally asking questions on xen-users but no one seems to have any idea about this so I figured I''d try this list. I compiled Xen from source (3.2 testing) on an Intel machine running Fedora Core 8 and have discovered that my guest (Windows Vista) does not have a network connection. Looking at various online documentation and a machine that does work, I guessed that I

Hi Folks, I have a RH9 machine running Samba 3.0.0 (Had the same situation when running 2.2.8) and I am not being able to make my W2K SP4 clients or XP join the PDC. I keep receiving the following message: "The following error occurred validating the name "ADIDOMAIN" The condition may be caused by a DNS lookup problem. For information about troubleshooting

I am working to a CentOS 6 server with nonstandard iptables system without rule for ACCEPT ESTABLISHED connections. All tables and chains empty (flush by legacy custom script) so only filter/INPUT chain has rules (also fail2ban chain): Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination f2b-postfix tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ACCEPT all --

Hi, I have a proxy/firewall, I want to dnat requests for 193.205.140.106 on port 443 towards 10.2.15.23 and requests for 193.205.140.106 on ports 4330 and 3389 towards 10.2.15.25, these rules must apply from internet, loc and fw (some client use a proxy on fw to reach these servers) I have tried with the following rules: DNAT net dmz:10.2.15.23 tcp 443 -

I have the problem when my localnetwork do telnet to the net Shorewall:FORWARD:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=eth2 my files are the following: policy #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL LIMIT:BURST loc net CONTINUE info loc fw ACCEPT info loc loc ACCEPT loc dmz ACCEPT info fw

This is a standard RedHat / CentOS firewall configuration, where I told it, through the standard RH setup GUI, that I want ssh and snmp allowed through. Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- anywhere anywhere Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source

very perplexed here - I need to turn off iptables. Ive tried service iptables save service iptables stop chkconfig iptables off service ip6tables save service ip6tables stop chkconfig ip6tables off edited OPGX280 ~ # cat /etc/sysconfig/system-config-firewall # Configuration file for system-config-firewall --disabled --service=ssh OPGX280 ~ :( # cat /etc/selinux/config SELINUX=disabled

Hello, I would like to ask you if its possible to run Samba on an other port than 137-139? I tried once to edit the "/etc/services" File. The lines: ... netbios-ns 137/tcp netbios-ns 137/udp netbios-dgm 138/tcp netbios-dgm 138/udp netbios-ssn 139/tcp netbios-ssn 139/udp ... I changed it to: ... netbios-ns 6998/tcp netbios-ns 6998/udp netbios-dgm 6999/tcp netbios-dgm 6999/udp

Hi team, one small query, Is netbios-ns,netbios-dgm and netbios-ssn ports 137,138,139 need to be open to communicate with windows from linux. what was the use of these services??

Hello, I am facing some problems in bridged networking. I have successfully created a bridge br0 and added a virtual machine to it. Now the address of virtual machine is 10.1.3.31. I am able to connect to this virtual machine by another computer on same network. The virtual machine is hosting a simple python http server on port 8000, while some other service is running on port 80 When I try