similar to: File already in use?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I see some strange errors on a samba-3.0.2a PDC and fileserver running under Linux. Every now and then users are not able to access some random file. Windows tells the user that the "file is already opened" or some similar error message (it's an error message in german) The files are varying, I see all kinds of filenames where

On 07/18/18 12:24, Andrew Holway wrote: >> >>> Still a lot better than trying to run your own hodge-podge of nightmares >>> on Linux. >> >> Beg pardon? Did I make a mistake on the email address? I thought this went >> to the CentOS general discussion list. >> > > I specifically meant setting up and running email services on linux is not >

On 2018-03-26, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > > Quite time ago we had a stripped setup here working only with Openldap and > PAM modules. LDAP with replication for redundancy, centralized communication > with local CA and over TLS. It worked very well. The successor of such setup > is SSSD for EL7 but the above should be still a feasible solution.

Hi! I have a server running CentOS 7.7 (1908) with all current patches installed. I think this server should be a quite standard installation with no specialities On this server I have fail2ban with an apache and openvpn configuration. I'm using firewalld to manage the firewall rules. Fail2an is configured to use firewalld: [root at server ~]# ll /etc/fail2ban/jail.d/ insgesamt 12

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I have a user who is running a Samba server to store data files for his ArcView 3.3 application. Client operating system is Windows XP professional. With Samba2 (2.2.8a) this was working quite fine, it usually took less than a few seconds to load and render one of the GIS presentations with ArcView. We then did an upgrade to Samba3 (3.0.20b)

Have you checked the network end of things? This is the same type of thing I see when the NIC and ethernet switch don't autonegotiate to the same settings. Hope I didn't step on anybody's toes here. I'm new to the list. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tony Hoover, Network Administrator KSU - Salina, College of Technology and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I have problems booting linux 2.4.21 with syslinux 2.04 from floppy. Booting with this combination I get the following error: Loading kernel................ Boot failed: please change disks and press a key to continue. (Note: there are exactly 16 dots ".", it this is relevant) The floppy was DOS formatted with mformat and contains

Hi! Am 09.04.20 um 10:07 schrieb Rob Kampen: [...] > I too had fail2ban fail after an otherwise successful yum update. Mine occurred in Feb when my versions of firewalld etc were updated to the versions you show. Thus far I have not had the opportunity to sort the problem. Lockdown has been quite busy so far, hopefully some slower times coming next week. Yeah, those pesky real-life biological

Hi! I already posted this question to the samba-ntdom list a few days ago, but haven't got a single answer so far :-( Learning that the ntdom list will be shut down shortly, I figured that this list is a more appropriate place to ask. Isn't it? So, this is the challenge: We have samba 2.2.0 running as PDC for a domain with about 30 NT workstations (up to SP6). We are using

> From: Chris Garrigues <cwg-bcc@deepeddy.com> > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 09:45:16 -0500 > > [2004/06/24 07:38:05, 0] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:ldapsam_search_one_group(1782) > ldapsam_search_one_group: Problem during the LDAP search: LDAP error: (N > o such object) These lines appear to all be searching for base="ou=group,dc=borderent,dc=com,dc=borderent,dc=com"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I think I stumbled on at least two bugs in the CentOS 7.2 pacemaker package, though I'm not quite sure if or where to report it. I'm using the following package to set up a 2-node active/passive cluster: [root at clnode1 ~]# rpm -q pacemaker pacemaker-1.1.13-10.el7_2.4.x86_64 The installation is up-to-date on both nodes as of the

Brad, I found your posting of 2/20/2004 with the subject line of "upgraded to 3.0.2 -> funkyness in machine accounts" while investigating a similar problem. I upgraded to 3.0.2 last week from 3.0.0. I have a system which I just added to the domain successfully. However, when I attempt to log a domain user onto that machine, I get this error: The system cannot log you on to

I just took on a new client who is having a curious problem with mangled names. Here's the history as I understand it: Originally they were on an NT server and there was no issue. My predecessor moved them to a samba server running on gentwo. I do not know what version of samba or how he moved the data, but when he did so, any files and folders with more than 8 characters started

What is the best path to follow to migrate an existing NT domain to a Samba server. I've got several other Samba domains elsewhere, but none of them started as NT domains so I didn't have to do a migration. The existing network has several servers, all of which I intend to retire from fileservice once this migration is finished. At the moment I have my samba server on the network in

While I wait for an answer to my last question, allow me to ask another. When we upgraded a samba server from 2.x to 3.0.0-2mdk using LDAP, we managed to change the domain SID. Instead of fixing the SIDs on the sever, I re-added the hosts to the domain. Although it was a lot of work, it was successful on most of the systems on the network. However, we have one old NT4 box on the network

nmbd has been dying on me occasionally. I'm running mandrake 9.2 with samba3-server-3.0.0-2mdk. We've got our users in ldap but I'd seen this symptom previously when I was using an earlier version of samba that didn't support ldap. There is nothing useful in the logs and a PS shows a nmb process still running. This last time around, I had a ptrace running on both nmbd

Haven''t been able to find a good enough answer on whether using sanitize() is enough to really protect me from XSS attacks I basically have a blog page that I want to allow people to display comments on but would like to allow html tags to be posted on the comments, these could html tags like the imageshack img tags, youtube player, photobucket img tags etc any other approaches or

Hello! Does anybody know of a Ruby implementation of a HTML sanitizer that prevents the attacks described on the xss cheatsheet? (http://ha.ckers.org/xss.html) I checked out the version Jamis wrote (http://dev.rubyonrails.com/ticket/1277), but that only covers the very basic attacks. Anybody? Just figured I would ask before, before I reinvent the wheel.. Ciao! Florian

Im going to install a samba domain at 4 of my sites but I trying to take of the best way to do this. going to have siteA, siteBm, siteC, and siteD. There will be an ipsec between all sites. In the past if i had to do a setup like that would to a box at each site and from there I would make rsync the samba passwd file to all the sites to keep logins in sync. Is there a better ways to to this?

I'm concerned about the machine known as accountingii in the below smbstatus: Samba version 3.0.5pre2-SVN-build-1326 PID Username Group Machine ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2727 bbeerman users bbeerman1 (10.2.240.172) 30957 llawrence users df2x1121 (10.2.240.190) 28942