similar to: Samba 3 and LDAP - Error loading profiles

Hi, I just tried an upgrade from Samba 3.0.2a to 3.0.11 to fix a known bug (1147), but now I get a different problem. Users cannot login. Here's what the log looks like in 3.0.2a ............. [2005/02/22 16:57:49, 2] param/loadparm.c:do_section(3339) Processing section "[shares]" [2005/02/22 16:57:49, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(79) added interface ip=192.168.4.10

Hi all, I have got 2 function (see bellow) which are simplifications of what I need to do. These functions are precisely the same, except for the last line. My question is, why doesn't function testA work in the same way as function testB. Both functions produce two objects, "a" and "b" that must merged with rbind. The difference is that in testA, I specify the name

Dear R gurus, I'm running into a problem with some modified segment plots I've coded using stars(). What I am trying to do is superimpose two series of data along with radial axes markers in a 2x2 graphics frame. This is working fine now, except for the hitch: my plots overfill the frame and are not centered within it (on my runs they always end up looking like they've been budged

Hi, during my tests to use Samba4 as a kdc for kerberized NFS, I found a bug in the KDC code, when generating a principal without pac (e.g. with msktutil and option --no-pac), that causes Samba4 to crash: Running the following command on one of the client machines msktutil -c --upn nfs/testa.linex.org -h testa.linex.org --computer-name testa-service-nfs --server s4-dc1.linex.org --no-pac

> >>>> Run this : getfacl /home/users > >>> getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names > >>> # file: home/users > >>> # owner: root > >>> # group: A\\domain\040admins > >>> user::rwx > >>> user:root:rwx > >>> user:10512:rwx > >>> group::rwx > >>>

I'm at my wits end here so hopefully someone can help me. Currently I have a Redhat 9.0 box running Samba 2.2.7 with openldap 2.0.27 as a PDC Domain logins work great with this setup. I can add, remove, modify computers and users all day long without a glitch. I do not store usernames in the local smbpasswd or passwd files. User information is stored in ou=Users,dc=mydomain,dc=com Group

Hi all! I'm newbie, so here goes my situation: I have succefully compiled the cvs version as shown in asterisk website in some linux distros: Debian (2.4.22), Conectiva, Fedora Core 1 and in all of them, * starts and consumes all the cpu (on top). Does anybody know this issue? Thanks! Testa

Hi! I'm new here, and I was wondering if there is any newsgroup gateway to the Asterisk lists? Thanks! Testa

Hi, I am trying to print from my Debian unstable Notebook to a printer that is connected to a Windows 2000 Server. Target environment is CUPS which uses smbspool as a front-end, and smbspool gives a strange error message. | export DEVICE_URI="smb://account:password@domain/server/printer" | smbspool foo bar Title 1 ignore Makefile gives the error message | ERROR: ERRHRD - ERRgeneral

Hello. I have two records in dialplan: exten => testA,1,Dial(PJSIP/outgoing/sip:thetestcall at sip.linphone.org) exten => testB,1,Dial(PJSIP/outgoing/sip:thetestcall at iptel.org) Calling testA works fine while testB fails with "CONGESTION". Adding debug for console shows that pjsip_resolver.c does `New queries added, performing parallel resolution again` for linphone after

On 09/13/2018 08:18 PM, Damien Miller wrote: > We have any plans to add more crypto options to OpenSSH without a strong > justification, and I don't see one for X448-SHA512 ATM. What I like about it is that it offers ~224 bit security level, whereas X25519 offers ~128 bits (according to RFC7748). Hence, pairing X448 with AES256 would provide a full chain of security in the ~224 bit

What I'm hearing in this thread is: "a minority of people on planet Earth have a problem with the open-source implementation of ED25519, but instead of letting that minority choose to re-implement it when/if they want to, the rest of the community needs to stall their progress in improving security." And isn't the ED25519 code is already there on their machine? So isn't

On 09/22/2017 03:22 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2017-09-21 18:12:44 -0400, Joseph S Testa II wrote: >> I gotta say... having a fallback mechanism here seems pretty >> strange. The entire point of the group exchange is to use a dynamic >> group and not a static one. > > fwiw, i think dynamic groups for DHE key exchange is intrinsically > problematic

Hi, I admin a box that has Subversion users authenticate with public keys to a restricted 'svnuser' account. The comment field of all the keys describe who they belong to (it has their usernames), but unfortunately, sshd does not log this when a user successfully authenticates: Jun 21 08:18:22 localhost sshd[23636]: Accepted publickey for svnuser from x.x.x.x port 2065 ssh2 Jun

I have many very large dataframes with 20 columns each. In order to conserve memory, I wish to separate the data frame into 20 vectors, each named the name of the dataframe followed by .1,.2,.3 .20. (For example purposes, one data frame is named ?testa?.) e.g. testa.1, testa.2, testa.3 I have written the code to do this (see below). I am trying to convert this into a function that I can reuse.

Hi all, I'm interested in having X448 protocol available as an option, as it gives a larger security margin over X25519. For anyone unfamiliar, it is an Diffie-Hellman elliptic curve key exchange using Curve448 (defined in RFC7748: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7748). Furthermore, it is included in the new TLS 1.3 specification (RFC8846: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8446).

Dear R users, I am tryting to save an 3d array to a matlab file like the following. A <- array(1:24, c(2,3,4)) writeMat(filename, A=A) But if I load the mat file from Matlab, it is not 3d matrix anymore. Does anyone know how I can preserve the 3d structure? Any help will be greatly appreciated. Minho Chae [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Hi all, Back in September 2018, I started a thread about implementing the X448 key exchange (see https://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/2018-September/037183.html). In February 2020, RFC 8731 (formally specifying X448 in SSH) has been finalized: https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc8731.txt. I thought I'd start this conversation up again to see if the interest level has

Hi all, I'm attempting to build a backup system using rsync and subversion. I have a samba share which I would like to replicate via rsync. The replicated copy is under subversion control to store a 'history'. This appears to work well until a directory is removed on the primary (non-backup) file system. The rsync command which I assumed would do the job: $ rsyc -zrv

On 9/4/23 16:43, Joseph S. Testa II wrote: > I very often see IT personnel and developers simply use the default > options for ssh-keygen. They just don't care/don't know to care. > Switching the default to ED25519 would bring the equivalent security > up from 112-bits to 128-bits (as 2048-bit RSA is equivalent to 112-bits > of symmetric strength), which would be a nice