similar to: PAC implementation, under "open" license.

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "PAC implementation, under "open" license."

2004 Jul 01
1
What can I lose if I use ldap compatibility with samba 2 schema?
Hi! I'm trying to use Directory Administrator from http://diradmin.open-it.org/files.php, but It only work with the old sambaAccount schema, so, My question would be: What is *really* new on samba 3 with the use of sambaSamAccount?, do I lose something if I use the compat mode? Thanks in advance for any answer, sincerely, Ildefonso Camargo icamargo@merkurio.com.ve icamargo@unet.edu.ve
2004 Jun 03
0
Detail on Samba 3 By Exmaple (comments).
Hi! I have been reading the Samba 3 by example avaible on the web site (samba-guide.pdf), I think it is very good, but have a question: - In section 6.3.5 (page 150, numerated), there is a note wich says that the computers account must be inside the People container due to an error in samba. Is this true?, or can it be due to the config of the nss-ldap and the pam-ldap modules wich is on
2004 Apr 14
3
OpenLDAP,heimdal kerberos,sasl, wich order?
Hi! I have been reading for about two weeks (maybe I'm reading on the wrong places). I have found as many documents as one could expect describind how to build a LDAPv3 server, or how to build samba with ldap. This far, I have failed, and have a BIG confution in the order in wich the things should go: In one document, they recommend this: samba -> ldap -> sasl -> kerberos
2003 Aug 13
1
FWD SIP phone format=2, FWD call format=4, why?
Hi! I'm trying an asterisk-FWD connection. I'm using X-Lite OR SIPPS as the IP phone. I configured the X-Lite and SIPPS to use GSM codec. Whe I call FWD, I get this info on the channels when the call has not been stablished yet: sip show channels Peer User/ANR Call ID Seq (Tx/Rx) Lag Jitter Format 192.246.69.223 613 1770bf3430d 00102/00000
2003 Sep 23
1
Cisco 7960 SIP Firmware.
Hi! The university where I work just bought four Cisco 7960G IP phones (they didn't ask, just came across the door and gave me a box and told me: "Can you make this work with the Asterisk PBX we have?"). According to what I read, there is no much hope, because I have not the SIP firmware (too bad). Has anybody succesfully got an answer from cisco?, or does anybody happend to
2003 Aug 19
2
Re: Open source IP phone, maybe?
Hi! I think it is a great idea. The DS80C400 needs external memory, and/or flash. It have the Ethernet integrated, but it is really slow (it is 8051 architecture), and yes, I know it can go up ti 75Mhz, but only gives 18MIPS max. I would use ATmega128 from atmel (16MIPS at only 16Mhz), take a look at: http://www.ethernut.de (project using mega128 with Ethernet, includes schematics). It
2003 Sep 11
2
SIP client<->NAT<->Asterisk<->NAT<->SIP client. only works with canreinvite=no.
Hi! I have this configuration: SIP client A <-> NAT box A (real external IP) <-> Asterisk server (real IP) <-> (real external IP) NAT box B <-> SIP client B The echo test form any of the clients to the asterisk server is working just fine, even without canreinvite=no. When I try to call from SIP client A to B, wihtout the canreinvite=no in the sip.conf, the call
2003 Aug 19
0
Re: Open source IP phone, maybe?
I concur with Jose. The Atmel AVR series packs a lot of bang for the buck. They also come in a 3.3v low power version for use in battery powered systems. Gene -----Original Message----- From: Leo Ann Boon [mailto:leo@innovax.com.sg] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:21 PM To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Open source IP phone, maybe? Ubicom's Scenix IP2K.
2003 Jul 28
0
Re: Asterisk-Users digest, Vol 1 #882 - 11 msgs
Hi! Sure, just look for: Wonder Shaper. It's a HTB based shaper configuration wich have some very good features, I use a variation of that here at my College. http://lartc.org/wondershaper/ It is the page (a simple google search). Also make sure to uncomment the line tos=lowdelay in every config file of asterisk that have it. Hope it is usefull, sincerely, Ildefonso Camargo
2003 Aug 08
0
VoicemailMain2, inband digits detection, rcf2833 digits detection (rtp issue, I think)
Hi! I've been trying to use the Voicemail (and Voicemail2) applications with an SIP Phone (X-Lite, for those who cares), when I use g.711(a/u) codec, it works perfectly with inband (it detects the whole mailbox (in my case 10007)), but not with rfc2833 (in this case, it only detects 107 as the mailbox number). With gsm codec, the inband doesn't work, I guess that's due to the
2003 Sep 19
0
phonecore, gnophone from CVS.
Hi! I was trying to use gnophone with asterisk, but I can't make a call (It just get the a answer of "REJET"), but I can register an everything. Anyway, I decided to move to the cvs version of gnophone, so I checked out EVERYTHING from cvs.digium.com (yes, a cvs -z7 co .). I installed libiax2, gsm (the one that was inside gnophone), and got gnophone to start compiling. But
2004 May 28
4
Wiki TOS - worrying for an open source project?
Hi there, I've made a couple of small contributions to the wiki but recently I read the Terms of service, they are pretty draconian: LICENSE AND SITE ACCESS voip-info.org grants you a limited license to access and make personal use of this site. This license does not include any resale or commercial use of this site or its contents. Without express written consent of voip-info.org you may
2003 Jul 21
1
PAnasonic And Asterisk
Dear Pals One customer has a Panasonic PBX KX-T336 with 60 ext. and a E1 (R2) for Trunks working perfectly now, This customer has 10 wireless links to his branches, wireless working great now, no voice at the present MY IDEA : T1Card into the Panasonic (additional to the E1) connected to a T1 Digium Card into Asterisk as far as I know the T1 Card can be configured as E&M to act as
2019 Nov 19
2
RFC: Moving toward Discord and Discourse for LLVM's discussions
David, I'm glad you mentioned Discord's T&Cs. I'm not generally concerned about these kinds of things, but Discord's seems particularly aggressive. Particularly the phrase "perpetual, nonexclusive, transferable, royalty-free, sublicensable, and worldwide license" is... a lot. Since LLVM is a permissively licensed project I assume many of our contributors care about
2013 Mar 15
0
Kerberos MS PAC info dump
Hi, Does Samba have a tool which can list the MS PAC content of a Kerberos cache ? Thank you Markus
2003 Jun 25
1
Kerberos PAC information
Does SAMBA 3.0 use the PAC information available within a Microsoft Kerberos ticket? Thanks. -dan -------------------------------------- Daniel Wachdorf drwachd@sandia.gov Sandia National Laboratories System Security Research and Integration 505-284-8060
2012 Feb 20
1
Privilege Attribute Certificate (PAC) Disabled/Samba authentication
Hi, I'm currently attempting to setup a Linux Samba and Kerberized NFS server using a Windows 2008 R2 Domain controller as a KDC and I've run into an issue. Currently I can make Kerberized NFS or Samba fileserving work but not both at the same time. Specifically: The Linux kerberized NFS daemon (rpc.svcgssd) appears to only be able to deal with service tickets up to a certain size.
2012 Jan 09
0
Analytics Consultant, Sr. Analytics Consultant and Principal Analytics Consultant (AC/SAC/PAC), Bangalore India
Hi UseRs, Please find the Job Description posted below. Our organization is looking for people with strong quantitative skills who is also strong in programming with R. Do get in touch with Prabhanshu (prabhanshu.pandey at 247customer.com) if you consider your experience and skills a good fit for the roles below. Location: *Bangalore, India* Let me know if you need any further clarification.
2006 Mar 31
1
package?<pac>
When I use package?<pac> the author field gets reproduced twice, once with the \author{ } string and a secod time formatted. Also, would it be possible to make package?<pac> find the overview without the package being attached, or at least give a more informative error message. Paul Gilbert
2004 Jul 17
9
Re: QoS for Voip.
Hi! I answer to two messages from this thread (I use digest). lartc-request@mailman.ds9a.nl wrote: > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 10:51:37 -0700 (PDT) > From: ibro tj <ibb_linux@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: [LARTC] QoS for Voip. > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl, alessandro.ren@opservices.com.br > > Hi, > > the hint from Martin A Brown which I am