Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Build Errors, torture tests 3.0.x/HP-UX 11i"
2004 Jul 28
2
Building Samba 3.0.5 on HP-UX 11.11
First -- to avoid the common answers to the 'building on HP-UX'
questions that seem to be available on the list and the web:
1) using the depot from the Porting Center won't work, it's well
downrev of 3.0.5 and I need to get the new security fixes (so that the
security team will go back into it's dark dank den and fear not for
the security of our environment)
2) samba.org
2003 Jun 17
0
problems compiling 3.0beta
Greetings!
I'm trying to build Samba3.0beta.
I'm running HP-UX 11.11
I'm using GCC 3.2.3
I ran the configure script. Then I ran Make. It crap's out pretty much
immediately. If anyone could look at the output below, and offer a
suggestion, it would be greatly appreciated. I'm sure its something
bone-headed that I'm doing wrong.
Thanks!
Ron
# make
Using FLAGS
2019 Aug 30
2
RFC: Adding GCC C Torture Suite to External Test Suites
TL;DR: I am proposing to add the GCC C Torture suite [1], as an additional external source of tests for the “nightly” test suite. If you are willing to review the patch, it is here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66887
Background:
While working on the RISC-V backend, we have found it useful to use additional test suites beyond the in-tree Clang and LLVM tests and the LLVM nightly tests, in order to
2019 Aug 30
2
RFC: Adding GCC C Torture Suite to External Test Suites
On Fri, 30 Aug 2019 at 17:34, Finkel, Hal J. via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 8/30/19 10:18 AM, Sam Elliott via llvm-dev wrote:
> > TL;DR: I am proposing to add the GCC C Torture suite [1], as an additional external source of tests for the “nightly” test suite. If you are willing to review the patch, it is here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66887
>
2006 Dec 18
2
Error compiling on HP-UX
Dear all,
I hope this is the right mailing list for my question -- I felt that this was
too technical for R-help.
I am trying to compile R-2.4.0 on a HP-UX system:
./configure
MAKE=gmake --prefix=$HOME --without-x --without-tcltk --disable-R-profiling --without-readline --disable-multibyte
R is now configured for ia64-hp-hpux11.23
Source directory: .
Installation directory:
2019 Sep 03
2
RFC: Adding GCC C Torture Suite to External Test Suites
There are 1500 tests total, and about 100 on the platform-agnostic blacklist. Alex and I do not think this is an onerous burden for maintenance, either as an external test suite or if the test suite is imported.
In the long term, if we import the tests, we know we will have to do updates when the Embecosm work lands, and beyond that updates can be more sporadic. It’s not clear to me how much
2003 Dec 09
2
Telemarketer Torture
Hello--
I submitted of extensions.conf that contains my "telemarketer torture"
menus, last week sometime to the mailing list.
I got back a note from the mailing list machinery, stating that it was
too big, and would be subject to approval. No such approval came, I
guess. Either I missed it, or it didn't rate, or the moderator just
plain hasn't gotten around to it yet.
So, I
2007 May 05
3
asterisk telemarketer torture sound files
Hi,
I have some annoying telemarketer calling me on a recurring basis,
but I'd like to discourage them a bit and have some fun.
I found this:
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+AEL+Telemarketer+Torture
but the link to download the sound files is dead (wyoming.e-tools.com
is NXDOMAIN).
Anyone have a copy of these?
-Adam
2009 Jul 22
2
[LLVMdev] ARM backend failures from (gcc) c torture suite
I have run the torture test again svn head rev 76522 (2009/07/20) there are
now
2 compilation and 23 runtime failure. A tarball with reproducers is
attached.
Most problems are still vargs related.
Robert
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com>wrote:
> I don't have a target in front of me to run these tests at the moment,
> but walking
2009 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] ARM backend failures from (gcc) c torture suite
Can you file a bug? Thanks.
Evan
On Jul 22, 2009, at 8:30 AM, robert muth wrote:
> I have run the torture test again svn head rev 76522 (2009/07/20)
> there are now
> 2 compilation and 23 runtime failure. A tarball with reproducers is
> attached.
> Most problems are still vargs related.
>
> Robert
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Sandeep Patel
2009 Jun 11
2
[LLVMdev] ARM backend failures from (gcc) c torture suite
I wrote a few scripts to run llvm/arm against the gnu c torture test suite
which consists of over 900 smallish tests.
There were quite a few failures with llvm/arm which I hereby want to
report (see attached
tarball for the actual failing testsc).
Most of the failures are related to vararg/stdarg.
I think I saw a bug files for this but cannot find it anymore.
Is somebody on this?
Finally, I
2009 Jul 28
1
[LLVMdev] ARM backend failures from (gcc) c torture suite
Just filed bugs for this and a new rather severe one involving address
arithmetic.
Robert
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you file a bug? Thanks.
> Evan
>
> On Jul 22, 2009, at 8:30 AM, robert muth wrote:
>
> I have run the torture test again svn head rev 76522 (2009/07/20) there are
> now
> 2 compilation and 23
2008 Mar 16
4
Telemarketer Torture....
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Anyone have the telemarketer torture prompts? I would seriously like
to revive this.....
- --
James Finstrom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFH3I8qdloC7YyaIOoRAlAjAJ9Hp+3SS2Z8179HecWIETp4RVDzWQCeMizp
fW2JPZdYl/uxG1ziUwYnHGo=
=QPbv
-----END PGP
2009 Jun 12
0
[LLVMdev] ARM backend failures from (gcc) c torture suite
I don't have a target in front of me to run these tests at the moment,
but walking manually through va-arg-1.c, it's pretty clear that
there's some disconnect between the register spilling that happens in
LowerFORMAL_ARGUMENTS and what happens in LowerVASTART in
ARMISelLowering.cpp.
deep
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 8:45 AM, robert muth<robert at muth.org> wrote:
> I wrote a few
2005 Aug 10
2
Compiling smbtorture
Is smbtorture a simple SMB client that is completely separate from Samba
server? (I.e., can I use it to test, e.g., a regular Windows SMB
server?) Or is it something that only tests Samba server?
Anyway, I haven't had any luck compiling it. Any hints? Here is a
transcript (this is on SUSE Linux Enterprise 9):
cwu@cham6:~/tmp/apps/samba-3.0.14a/source> ./configure
1999 Jul 18
0
2.0.5-pre3: torture.c doesn't compile on rh60
rh60/2.2.10-ac10
Compiling utils/torture.c
utils/torture.c: In function `run_browsetest':
utils/torture.c:929: invalid type argument of `->'
utils/torture.c:934: invalid type argument of `->'
utils/torture.c: In function `create_procs':
utils/torture.c:1118: warning: initialization discards `volatile' from pointer
target type
utils/torture.c:1118: warning: passing arg 1
2011 Jul 11
2
Error when execute make quicktest
Hi Everyone. Im installing Samba4 and when i make the "make quicktest" y
recibe the following error: (sorry about my english).
= Failed tests =
== samba3.posix_s3.raw.open (s3dc) ==
command: /home/debian/samba-master/bin/smbtorture
--configfile=$SMB_CONF_PATH --maximum-runtime=$SELFTEST_MAXTIME
--target=samba3 --basedir=$SELFTEST_TMPDIR
2010 Nov 09
1
make quicktest failed
I had 444 errors I didn't want to put them all up here. Maybe I missed a
step, maybe it's an easy "oops you forgot to do this"
I'm on ubuntu 10.10 amd64 server completely uptodate today.
I followed the http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba4/HOWTO
My git is also today.
== samba4.rpc.echo on ncacn_ip_tcp with validate and
--option=socket:testnonblock=True
2011 Aug 03
1
Samba4 on CentOS6 make quicktest failed
Hello all
I followed samba4 how to
( CentOS6 minimum install )
#working fro me
./configure.developer
make
#failed for me
[root at dcmsc samba-4.0.0alpha16]# make quicktest
WAF_MAKE=1 ./buildtools/bin/waf test --quick
'test' finished successfully (0.000s)
Waf: Entering directory `/root/download/samba-4.0.0alpha16/bin'
[ 111/3389] Generating VERSION
Waf: Leaving directory
2008 Mar 16
0
Telemarketer Torture.... (was: Re: asterisk-users Digest, Vol 44, Issue 49)
You could accept as the "passcode" the caller punching in their own
phone#, then checking that against your whitelist. Lets associates get
past the challenge when using someone else's phone, without their
remembering some arbitrary passcode.
And strangers or barred old associates who abuse it can get an earful
about how you're suing them for wire fraud. Preferably after you