similar to: Virtual users

I'm working on upgrading a Samba server from Version 2.2.8a to Version 3.0.4. One of the things I've noticed is that the samba.schema has changed. I'll admit that I haven't done an exhaustive search yet, but in looking over the documentation I haven't seen any mention of anything that needs to be done to migrate an existing directory to the new schema. Are there any tools

Hello all I'm trying once again to get a Samba server set up on a Slackware Linux system for a small office (much less than 100 users). There will be multiple domains on this system (say foo.com, bar.com, ...) with the users scattered between these domains. We want to use LDAP to authenticate the users and provide authorization info. There are no Windows domain controllers available. All

Hello all. What are the implications of changing the domain name for a PDC? If I understand correctly, the SID is based on the domain name, so if the domain name (workgroup) setting in smb.conf is changed, will that mean that a new SID will be generated? If so, then I assume that all user/group SIDs will have to be updated. If the domain name is changed, can I just state that this is an

All - I am in the process of writing my own "add machine script" to use with Samba 3.0.20a and our OpenLDAP setup. For the most part it seems to work fine. If I run the script from the command line, I can see that the entry has been added to LDAP. If I then go to the Windows machine and tell it to join the domain, after giving it the Admin login and password it connects up with no

Hello all - I'm having a bit of a problem that I'm sure is being caused by my missing some trivial detail. But I haven't been able to find it, and I'm not even sure how I would construct the search to find relevant info in the archives. Here is the setup. I have Samba 3.0.20a running as a PDC against a LDAP back end. For the most part everything works fine. Users that are

We have a customer system running Slackware Linux (kernel 2.4.25) and Samba. The customer was running Samba 2.2.8 but we recently upgraded them to Samba 3.0.13. The customer has a FileMaker database on a public share. Before the upgrade, the customer was able to have multiple concurrent access to the database. After the upgrade, only the first user to access the database was successful.

Is there a trick to append an additional directory level onto the defauly behavior of a [homes] share looking in /etc/passwd to find the users Linux home dir? It would offer a bit of protection if Windows clients ended up in say the WinHome directory within their Linux home directory when logging in from Windows so they are not tempted to tamper with their desktop settings files for Linux from

Hi, I need to create one or more NetBIOS host alias of my unique SAMBA server version 2.27 which is running on a RedHat Linux 8.0 box acting as a simple file-sharing machine for our WORKGROUP. I need that my clients see three differents host more than the real fileserver; I think the scope of virtual server was based on which virtual host I'll contact I'll see the relative share: so

Hi, I need to create one or more NetBIOS host alias of my unique SAMBA server version 2.27 which is running on a RedHat Linux 8.0 box acting as a simple file-sharing machine for our WORKGROUP. I need that my clients see three differents host more than the real fileserver; I think the scope of virtual server was based on which virtual host I'll contact I'll see the relative share: so

So I have a freebsd machine setup, and it has 2 nick's in it. One is a REAL IP, and pulls in internet, the other is a a nat'ed nick, with samba running on it for the machines behind the firewall. Anyone know what to toss into my smb.conf to not let my outside nick xmit smbd/nmbd ? No one can connect via that interface, but people/viruses/whatever are still trying. Thanks! C.

Hello -- Our existing Unix system has more than 500 users. The system currently uses OpenLDAP to authenticate users. We just added dozens of PCs running Windows to the network. We are going to set up the existing Unix server as a samba PDC server such that the users can log onto either their Unix account or Windows account. It seems a good idea to allow the users have the same password for

On 09/10/15 20:57, Tovey, Mark wrote: > No joy. I added winbind to the passwd, shadow, and group lines and it is still not working. I also switched back to ad instead of rid (I deleted the Samba database files in /var/lib/samba and rejoined the domain when I switched), and still the same. If the account exists locally I can authenticate against AD and map the share. No local account

On Wed, Sep 18, 2019, 2:39 PM Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com> wrote: > > > On Sep 18, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Steven Wu <stevenwu at apple.com> wrote: > > Hi Dwight > > Thanks for the feedback. For the issue you reported, there has been few > reviews trying to tweak the -mllvm option when using legacy LTO interfaces > (myself included) but it never got enough

I downloaded the source code for Samba 4.0.0, the same as is distributed with my OS. I applied the patch as described in Bug 9862, compiled and installed the code, and now it works as expected. Having the user account in AD only is sufficient, I no longer have to have the account also in the Linux server's passwd file. So indeed, it appears that I have encountered the "map to guest =

Hi Dwight Thanks for the feedback. For the issue you reported, there has been few reviews trying to tweak the -mllvm option when using legacy LTO interfaces (myself included) but it never got enough traction to moving forward. Note how -tailcallopt is implemented as a -mllvm flag means that it is a debug option and probably not well tested. The option is also not stable which means it can be

On 09/10/15 18:54, Tovey, Mark wrote: > > Got it. I changed that section as follows: > > idmap config *:backend = tdb > > idmap config *:range = 5000-29999 > > idmap config DEVELOPMENT:backend = ad > > idmap config DEVELOPMENT:schema_mode = rfc2307 > > idmap config DEVELOPMENT:range = 30000-99999 > > It did

No joy. I added winbind to the passwd, shadow, and group lines and it is still not working. I also switched back to ad instead of rid (I deleted the Samba database files in /var/lib/samba and rejoined the domain when I switched), and still the same. If the account exists locally I can authenticate against AD and map the share. No local account and it fails. -Mark

Hi Dwight, Welcome to LLVM-dev! A few comments below. Cc'ing a few people who hopefully can add info on some of the specific issues here. Teresa On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 9:04 AM Dwight Guth via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I am lead developer of a project that is using LLVM to implement an > ahead-of-time compiled functional language. We use llc

The only way it seems to work is if I do have both the local and AD user with the same name. But my goal here is to not require that, to have the AD account only. I have applied Unix attributes to the users. testuser uidNumber = 30089 and gidNumber = 100. However, when I try to query with wbinfo, I was unable to look that up: wbinfo -i "DEVELOPMENT\testuser" failed to call

On 10/09/2015 12:31 PM, Tovey, Mark wrote: > The only way it seems to work is if I do have both the local and AD user with the same name. But my goal here is to not require that, to have the AD account only. > I have applied Unix attributes to the users. testuser uidNumber = 30089 and gidNumber = 100. However, when I try to query with wbinfo, I was unable to look that up: >