similar to: Samba IPv6 Support

Jerry, Read your slides from SambaXP 2004 but do not see any mention of IPv6 support. Do you have any plans to support IPv6 in the future ? Is there no push for it in the foreseeable future ? I attempted to send this question to samba@lists.samba.org <mailto:samba@lists.samba.org> but it kept kicking back to me from System Administrator [postmaster@Savola.COM] Thanks Chuck

Hi all, Working on samba-3.2.0.1 on an ARM board(fedora-8:ARM). With IPV6_ENABLE not set in the kernel config i find smbd hanging up continuously. strace showed the reason as --> EAFNOSUPPORT(Address family not supported by protocol) with socket and bind system calls to specified interfaces failing. So compiling the kernel with IPV6 enabled and then burning kernel image on the board, smbd

Hi Phil, NBT name resolution is IPv4 only. Samba does work over IPv6, but NetBIOS name resolution is and always will be IPv4 only. It is a feature of the protocol not Samba. Take a look at http://www.ipv6consultancy.com/ipv6blog/wp-content/uploads/sambaxp-2015-deploying-ipv6-only-samba-4-environments-v0_4.pdf and other presentations on the subject at

Hi all, I'm pretty new to CentOS. I am working with a newly set-up server: [cbearden at host ~]$ lsb_release -a LSB Version: :core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-amd64:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-amd64:printing-4.0-noarch Distributor ID: CentOS Description: CentOS release 6.3 (Final) Release: 6.3 Codename: Final I'm trying to solve this problem (X11 forwarding)

Hi, please note that the slides and recordings of this year's sambaXP User and Developer Conference talks are available here: https://sambaxp.org/ Cheers, Karolin -- SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9 AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen http://www.sernet.de, mailto:kontakt at sernet.de Meet us at Storage Developer

I noticed that samba is listening on IPv6, so I became curious and wondered if I could actually use it, and so far, it looks like it isn't usable. Running nbtstat -A fe80::216:3eff:fe6f:1f3a on Windows returns the stupid message that the address must be in the a.b.c.d format. I then tried using nbtlookup from linux: nmblookup -S -U '[fe80::216:3eff:fe6f:1f3a]' \* 10.1.1.232

Great news!!! I just didn't see anything in the changelog referring to "trust relationship," based on what the papper below show. https://sambaxp.org/fileadmin/user_upload/sambaXP2018-Slides/StefanMetzmacher_sambaxp2018_trusted_domain_support-rev0-compact.pdf Any news about trusts? On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 6:41 PM Johannes Engel via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:

> > Is this all that would be required to enable a deployment based upon a > > traditional PKI? > > > If you are using windows yes, if not then you would need to find a way > to replace the EDRS (there is a good doc about it here > > https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/security/identity-protection/hello-for-business/hello-how-it-works-provisioning > ) >

Hi Mason, On 9/26/20 9:34 AM, Mason Schmitt via samba wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I'm very interested in using Windows Hello for Business in small business > environments, with Samba as the AD DC. > good luck I got it kind of working with :1 samba DC, 1 windows 2012 DC, 1 windows 2016 ADFS > > I'm sorry that I don't have great news. The schema upgrade is the easy

Hi Phil, The answers are in the links but I'll expand a little below! 😉 > How can this be? Everything I have read about SMB for the last 20 years or so has said that it is based entirely on NetBIOS, and has no concept even of IPv4; that it is NBT that translates NetBIOS to run over IPv4. SMB does not have to be carried by NetBIOS. The too protocols can be decoupled. This is

Hello Mike, Am 04.05.2015 um 15:50 schrieb Mike: > I saw the following thread in the samba list archives but no solution: > > http://marc.info/?l=samba&m=141214808508452&w=2 > > Host OS: CentOS ver 7.1503 > Samba: Version 4.1.17-SerNet-RedHat-11.el7 > Samba4 is running with internal DNS. > I'm able to add a domain user with samba-tool and connect Win 8.1

Hi Andrew, I'm very interested in using Windows Hello for Business in small business environments, with Samba as the AD DC. I'm sorry that I don't have great news. The schema upgrade is the easy > part - we could do that by obtaining new schema from Microsoft: > > https://www.microsoft.com/en-nz/download/confirmation.aspx?id=23782 > (and yes, the licence terms are

On Thu, 31 May 2007, Zhao, Chuck C wrote: > I was working at the time, so I can't attend. > However, I am very interested in the talk. > If the presentation slides are available, could you please post me a > link? Yep, slides and video are available here: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2007-05/ We're still missing some people's slides though (hint hint John and Reid :), -Chris

Hello list, i run here an large mailsetup with some million mailboxes and got strange performance problems, cause i think i have overseen or forgotten an simple setting. Here are some details: 21 CentOS 7 Servers with dovecot 2.2.25 and ldap userdb/passdb via socket behind an hardware loadbalancer. The storage behind is an ISCSI Storage with 4 10Gbit/s multipath paths, splitted up to 10 TB

Ah, ok. Maybe you can do something with the static id mappings on the server. Map a computer to user But besides that, uhm, good luck... Stick with the login popup, and save yourself a lot of troubles. Maybe this wil give you a good hint, https://sambaxp.org/fileadmin/user_upload/sambaXP2018-Slides/StefanMetzmacher_sambaxp2018_trusted_domain_support-rev0-compact.pdf Imo, a hard one to

Chris Lattner wrote: > On Thu, 31 May 2007, Zhao, Chuck C wrote: > >> I was working at the time, so I can't attend. >> However, I am very interested in the talk. >> If the presentation slides are available, could you please post me a >> link? >> > > Yep, slides and video are available here: > http://llvm.org/devmtg/2007-05/ > >

Is IPv6 supported by PXELINUX? With the transition to IPv6 occurring already, I'm seeing requests for supporting an IPv6-Based PXEboot and need to know if it's supported or is planned for support.

We have kernel support for IPv6 in Centos, but not stateful firewall support. That requires at least the 2.6.20 kernel, which means Fedora Core 6 or some other Linux distro. None of the various free Linux firewalls have IPv6 support. Supposedly FWBuilder can manage Netfilters for a Linux Kernel, but that seems to be the extent of it. More sad facts as I uncover them.....

Thanks for the feedback Andrew!!! Maybe in 4.9.1 appear? :) On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 7:44 PM Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 19:39 -0300, Elias Pereira via samba wrote: > > Great news!!! > > > > I just didn't see anything in the changelog referring to "trust > > relationship," based on what the papper below

I was working at the time, so I can't attend. However, I am very interested in the talk. If the presentation slides are available, could you please post me a link? Thank you Chuck Zhao Intel Research -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20070531/c9b56c7e/attachment.html>