similar to: Problem with VFS audit and recycle (fwd)

I have compiled samba 3.0 on solaris 8 with default options. It's ok. I have problem with the parameters vfs objects. This is my smb.conf Global parameters [global] workgroup = SAMBATESTPDC netbios name = samba3sun preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes domain logons = yes local master = yes

Dear All, I have upgrade my samba from 3.0.33 to 3.3.3, that proces are success but I have a problem for samba-vscan. Error : [2012/01/16 10:32:00.074547, 0] smbd/vfs.c:167(vfs_init_custom) error probing vfs module 'vscan-clamav': NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL [2012/01/16 10:32:00.074559, 0] smbd/vfs.c:309(smbd_vfs_init) smbd_vfs_init: vfs_init_custom failed for vscan-clamav [2012/01/16

Hi, this is my first pos here, please be lenient. My problem shuld be a FAQ and, in fact I found a lot of references googling around, but nothing could really solve my problem, so here I am. I have a Samba server: Very basic wheezy amd64 installation on a small VIRTUAL server (Xen). Only fancy thing is direct access to a couple of RAID1 (mirror) arrays where data is stored. I normally access

I just installed samba3+samba-vscan via ports on a FreeBSD 4.x system. Samba is running just fine and thanks to the help of webmin it was easily configured. Today I finally was able to get windows shares to be mounted on my FreeBSD server. So naturally I want to run av scans on it. I set it up to mount the entire C drive and to scan it using clamav which is also installed from ports. I recompiled

add to each share writeable = yes or read-only = no This Helps! Rauno -----Original Message----- From: werner maes [mailto:werner.maes@cc.kuleuven.ac.be] Sent: 11. mai 2004. a. 16:19 To: samba@samba.org Subject: [Samba] BUG: Vfs audit module & samba 3.0.4 ==> share unaccessible Hello Maybe there's a bug in samba-3.0.4. The following configuration does NO longer work. It did

Hi, guys. I'm new to all of this and need some help with a problem I've been banging my head against for a while. (Tried troubleshooting, checking logs, and lots of Googling for a few weeks now, but just keep hitting dead ends.) SYMPTOM: Missing file `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/vfs/glusterfs.so`, as evidenced by error messages like these: [2018/11/18 07:56:42.551587, 0]

We installed the Samba 3.5.1 rpms for OpenSuSE 10.2 from ftp.sernet.de. The VFS modules seem to be broken. Is this an error in the packaging or do I need to be looking else where. A snippet from the log file follows: <extracted from log> [2010/03/12 19:58:59, 0, pid=28792, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/vfs.c:66(smb_register_vfs) Failed to register vfs module. The module

Any ideas why a vfs module loads successfully then can't be found? [2005/01/30 03:52:08, 5] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(309) se_access_check: access (2) granted. [2005/01/30 03:52:08, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_default(203) Initialising default vfs hooks [2005/01/30 03:52:08, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_custom(229) Initialising custom vfs hooks from [/usr/lib/samba/vfs/audit.so]

Is there anyone running Samba 3.0.X on Solaris 8 that has VFS working? I am dying to know if this is a problem with my setup or if there is something else going on. If you do have it working, please let me know which module. Thanks. Bill Knox Lead Operating Systems Programmer/Analyst The MITRE Corporation ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 13:54:26 -0400

Hi I've compiled and installed 2.2.5 on a Solaris 2.8 box. When attempting to browse the workgroup, a popup messages is displayed: Simple is not accessible. A device attached to the system is not functioning If I check the log file, the following error messages show up: ............ Jul 3 10:08:26 serv03 smbd[1544]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] [2002/07/03 10:08:26, 0]

Hi, I just upgraded samba from 3.0.37 to 3.4.6 on a gentoo machine. After converting the passwd file (pdbedit -i smbpasswd -e tdbsam) I tried to login from a windows client but it didn''t work. After commenting the vfs-recycle entries in the shares definition I could successfully login. I cannot find any hint that the vfs objects in samba 3.4 has changed. Can somebody help? Thanks in

I have this one remaining issue before I can declare my Samba rollout to be successful. I have been trying to implement the recycle feature. My server is a Dell Intel, with Redhat Enterprise 3.0 Linux and Samba 3.0.14 (I believe I have all the string and the periods in the right place). Here is the recycle configuration I have for a share, as my test: [contractors] comment = Contractors

Hi, I'm having Problem in getting the file_ext_map (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/file-ext-map/file_ext_map3/file_ext_map3.c?rev=1.2) vfs modules running with samba 3.0.10. I'm trying the cvs-version of the module which was originally coded for samba 3.0.0. It compiles fine against current samba code, but when I try to use it samba complains that it can't find the vfs

Hello, I'm running a PDC and a secondary DC in privilegded lxc containers and try to setup a fileserver in an unprivileged lxc container. The shares of the file server are on the ZFS of the host and mapped via bind-mount. I've got the problem, that I get error messages when setting the ACLs of a samba share either via the Windows explorer or using the smbcacls command. On Windows

Hello First I prepared mks_vir Daemon, necessary libraries and modules, everything work fine (I can scan files for vireses from the command line) after that I had install samba from source next I copies and modyfying necessary mks configuration file like /etc/samba/vscan-mks32.conf and add to /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf following lines in global section: vfs object =

When Kaspersky adds the following to smb.conf I can't connect from XP. If I comment out "vfs object" connection is restored. <snip> [store-00] # ADDED BY KASPERSKY ANTI-VIRUS FOR SAMBA SERVERS 5.0 vfs object = kavsamba5-smb-3.0.2 comment = File Directories path = /store-00 browseable = yes writeable = yes valid users = frank read only = no

Hi, I just upgraded samba from 3.0.37 to 3.4.6 on a gentoo machine. After converting the passwd file (pdbedit -i smbpasswd -e tdbsam) I tried to login from a windows client but it didn''t work. After commenting the vfs-recycle entries in the shares definition I can successfully login. I cannot find any hint that the vfs objects in samba 3.4 has changed compared to 3.0.x. Can somebody

On 25/12/2019 20:04, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 25/12/2019 16:46, Chris via samba wrote: >> Hello, > Merry Christmas Thanks Rowland! Hope you had a Merry Christmas too >> The shares of the file server are on the ZFS of the host and mapped >> via bind-mount. > > Ah, that could be a problem, ZFS uses NFSv4 ACLs >> > Try 'nfs4acl_xattr'

Hello list, I know this has been discussed before (June 2007 looks to be the most recent time), so apologies for covering (sort of) old ground. The lowdown is that samba uses readdir to get its directory listing and this is returned in whatever order the filesystem sees as appropriate (using ext3, it seems to be related to mtime). I have a device which accesses a share using CIFS and presents

Hi Mariusz, I found this thread at SAMBA.ORG: snip... I can't remember for certain, but try using a relative path. > (e.g. vscan-mksd.so). I tried relative and non-relative path, with this same effect but you've right because in manual for samba-vscan we can read that in samba 3.0 we should use relative path. I had increase debug level of samba daemon and in my log I have found