similar to: Suspiciously broken filesystem

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7618 Summary: symlinks and --link-dest Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: the_majkl at seznam.cz QAContact:

Hi! I am using SAMBA 3.5.x and it doesn't work with IBM TSM. IBM TSM works properly with SAMBA 3.2.15. Is there any chance to solve this issue in future SAMBA versions? Best regards /Adrian Berlin -- You Rock! Your E-Mail Should Too! Signup Now at Rock.com and get 2GB of Storage! http://connections.rock.com/user/displayUserRegisterPage.kickAction?as=116748&STATUS=MAIN

All, Can anyone confirm that Samba/Solaris will integrate with TSM (Tivoli Storage Manager) when deployed into a Wintel client environment. ie. Solaris/Samba as a TSM client - we need to be sure that the ACL's will be maintained correctly via a TSM backup/restore (full or partial) Or confirm this does not work, which is not what we want to hear - but the truth will suffice. Many thanks,

Hi - I was wondering if any of you may be able to point me in the right direction. I am in the process of designing a fairly large fileserver solution in an MS Active directory environment. I have setup and tested ctdb samba, however, after several discussions with a couple of my colleagues, i am now considering a more vanilla flavour of samba. The key features the solution requires are: •

Hi all, I was wondering if anyone might be able to speak about using IBM's GPFS filesystem as a means of storing virtual guests in a clustered environment with CentOS as the nodes and KVM as the hypervisor? I'm looking at using IBM's TSM software for archiving data from disk to tape. This requires buying a license for GPFS which is used in conjunction with TSM but can also be used

Hi We have been trying back-up a glusterfs (v3.1.4) area using the Tivoli TSM software to an off-site area. The back-up keeps failing with the following typical error messages 06/14/2011 22:22:58 ANS1587W I/O error reading file attributes for: /gdata/projects/philex/OAG/2011/May16/mdor3km10/coast_den2.in. errno = 22, Invalid argument 06/14/2011 22:22:59 ANS4007E Error processing

Greetings. At the moment, I'm applying R to some AIX 'nmon' output, trying to get a handle on some disk performance metrics. In case anyone's interested: http://docs.osg.ufl.edu/tsm/pdf/ some of them are more edifying than others. (ahem) I'm trying to develop a somewhat general framework for plotting these measures, in the hopes that it's of some use to people other

On Thu, 4 May 2023 16:32:16 -0700 Marc MERLIN <marc_nouveau at merlins.org> wrote: > Hi again, I just saw a bunch of commits from all of you (thanks), but > still can't find info if my thinkpad P73 with Quadro RTX 4000 > Mobile/TU104 is meant to be supported, or not, and if so, how I can > best report issues beyond what I've already sent. > > The intel graphics

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to comp.emacs.xemacs as well. [This message has been CC'ed to the OpenSSH list in a plea to at least consider supporting more advanced usages of Xauth] Chris Green <sprout at dok.org> writes: > Its not configurable behavior. It always generates a new random file > in /tmp. Then they should probably

Hi, I see there are some previous threads on gnuclient.exe, but I can't figure this out based on those... I recently started using ESS with Xemacs. I'm on Windows XP. On starting iESS, my editor gets set to 'gnuclient.exe'. I don't understand how this works, since there is no executable anywhere on my machine called "gnuclient.exe". But I have no complaints: I like

There are already some commerical backup tools available which can backup ACLs (www.atempo.com, IBM TSM, ....) Yours Tom ______________________________________________________________________________ UNICEF bittet um Spenden fur die Kinder im Irak! Hier online an UNICEF spenden: https://spenden.web.de/unicef/special/?mc=021101

Is rsync a good way to make a valid copy of offline database files (TSM, in this case) from one xfs filesystem to another? If so, which options should I use? Once again, the database services would be shut down, so the database would be offline. Bill Dorrian Network Administrator Desk: 904-273-7625 Cell: 904-859-9471 " Follow the 2012 FedExCup season at PGATOUR.COM." "The

Hello to you all! We are implementing here at the University KVM virtualization for our servers and services and i was wondering if anyone try to automatically backup images. I am actually using logical volumes for the VM guests. All virtual clients are installed in their LVM logical volume. We are already use IBM TSM for backup as we used to when we had physical machines, ie install client

Hi folks, I''m having (as the title suggests) a problem with zfs send/receive. Command line is like this : pfexec zfs send -Rp tank/tsm@snapshot | ssh remotehost pfexec zfs recv -v -F -d tank This works like a charm as long as the snapshot is small enough. When it gets too big (meaning somewhere between 17G and 900G), I get ssh errors (can''t read from remote host). I tried

Hi On Windows 10 when using a debug build of LLVM 10, I get this assertion failure: Assertion failed: (KV.second.getFlags() & ~WeakFlags) == (I->second & ~WeakFlags) && "Resolving symbol with incorrect flags", file C:\work\github\llvm-10.0.0.src\lib\ExecutionEngine\Orc\Core.cpp, line 450 The same failure occurred in LLVM 9 too: Assertion failed: I->second ==

Long back I found that TSM (Tivoli Storage Manager - a backup/archive program sometimes still called by its older name of ADSM) didn't handle ext3 filesystems very well, and provided a note with workround for Stephen's documentation. I've just pulled the TSM client version 5.1.0 and one of the announced features is ext3 (and jfs) support. So if you use TSM and upgrade, you can take

I have many systems running current ext3 code. Some of them have hardware problems that lead to frequent reboots, and the journal recovery has worked excellently. However, on the periodic forced fsck on supposedly recovered and clean filesystems, I've many times seen fsck report that i_blocks is too large in one or more inodes. I suspect that i_blocks is somehow escaping proper restoration

I tried it on loop. 1. mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/test -t ext3 2. cp files to 100% full 3. umount /mnt/test 4. fsck.ext3 -f /dev/loop0 Inode xxxxx, i_blocks is xxx, should be yyy. Fix?

Has anyone tried LFS (ie >2G files support) and Ext3 together? Are there good reasons why this should/should not work? I see the RH enterprise kernel patch set specifically does not attempt both lfs and ext3, but the lfs patches themselves touch some reasonably localised parts of ext2, so I would hope (without having dived in there to test), that the ext3 changes would mirror that

Hi, To to build an RPM from the nut 2.0.3 source I've corrected the old nut.spec.in file. Please find a copy of the slightly updated spec file attached. The changes are documented at the bottom of the spec file. Regards, Will -------------- next part -------------- # don't know how different I can do this %define majorver 2.0 %define version 2.0.3 %define relver 1 %define nutuser