similar to: Re: specified network name no more available

I was stung by this bug yesterday myself and although there are numerous references to this error message I haven't seen any qualified resolution of the problem. Not that the following rant hopes to be such, but it's a good story. My setup is a stable 2.2.8a production domain and an experimental 3.0.2a-SuSE domain. The passwd backend is still smbpasswd. I wish there were a better

I hope Time won't take me to a CDMA court martial in Guantanamo for unfair use of your quotes, Daniel! The point is that each norm is only really valid in its original context. It is the spirit of the norm which should guide us. The idea is: you slap an unorthodox attribute onto an object to evoke any kind of practical magic and then laugh your sides off. Who cares? The same with Readonly.

Dragan, Andy Thanks for your answsers. Please find hereafter more information and my notes. Nadine ---------------------- R?achemin? par Nadine Vandois/FR/BULL sur 11/08/2003 10:56 --------------------------- "Dragan Krnic" <dkrnic@lycos.com> sur 10/08/2003 09:47:05 Veuillez r?pondre ? dkrnic@lycos.com Pour : nadine.vandois@bull.net cc : samba@lists.samba.org Objet :

Dragan Krnic DB Fernverkehr AG P 955 - 7166 ____________________________________________________ Internetauftritt der Deutschen Bahn AG >> http://www.bahn.de Dragan Krnic

A trivial case: executing the following DOS command from the prompt line on a Win2K SP3: %windir%\system32\attrib.exe +R H:\dir can't set the R(eadonly) flag on my home dirs (2.2.7): drwxrwsr-x 4 me users 4096 Nov 27 17:59 . drwxr-sr-x 2 me users 4096 Nov 27 17:59 dir -r--r--r-- 1 me users 0 Nov 27 17:59 empty.txt drwxr-sr-x 2 me users 4096 Nov 27 17:27

running echo %userprofile% from a windows command prompt will tell you exactly where your user profile is located. running set will give you all your environment settings. Jim Wharton Network Administrator Alachua County Property Appraiser jwharton@acpafl.org > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-bounces+creole3=bellsouth.net@lists.samba.org >

thanks very much for your kind and fast assistance! greetings from holland. mourik jan > -----Original Message----- > From: Dragan Krnic [mailto:dkrnic@lycos.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 11:19 > To: mourik jan c heupink > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Samba vs. Windows : significant difference in > timestamphandling? > > > > and (now that

>-------- Message d'origine-------- >De: Dragan Krnic [mailto:dkrnic@lycos.com] >Date: sam. 9/13/2003 20:15 >?: J?r?me Fenal >Cc: samba@lists.samba.org >Objet: Re: Problem uploading printer driver on 2.2.8a (FreeBSD 4.8) >It's a bug. Fortunately it can be fixed by applying >a couple of patches described in > >

Hi I cannot seem to find any information regarding this in the mailing lists . I am testing a UNIX PDC before I implement it to general use in the network . It works fine It would appear with the win 2000 clients. But I essentially have two problems 1. When I have PGP installed on the machine and log in with a roaming profile . It creates a network associates folder that does not get

I've parsed a whole year's worth of postings in this group and didn't find any previous reference to the problem. Since I've updated McAfee to version 8 many applications which open file chooser dialogs report "Access denied" when trying to open a Samba share, including the users's own home directory. At installation one can choose to exclude some apps from the

Hi, For reasons best known to the IT admin before myself, we currently have a domain name of WARLOCK. I want to change this. We have about 15 WinXP Pro client machines on the domain as well as a few linux domain clients. A bit of reading shows that it should be as simple as doing a net getlocalsid, making the change, followed by a net setlocalsid. I started doing this when I noticed something

John, don't be harsh with Philippe. To answer his question, you don't really need any more information than what he abundantly provided in his mailing. His problem is that he hasn't installed the ldap-devel or pam-devel or some other of the more than 100 devel packages that might be needed to compile samba with a distinctive set of --with-this-or-that options. His compiler simply

Hello, I have installed cups on a linux server (running with RH 9.0). When executing "cupsaddsmb -a -v", I get an error: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFULL, when attemping to execute adddriver". Can someone help on the meaning of this error, and on its reason (cause) ? Please find hereafter a file with result (and the error) of this commmand "cupsaddsmb", for a printer:

>On November 28, dkrnic@t-online.de said: >> actually a second attempt at drawing your attention to the fact >> that compliance with M$ quirks and kinks is not something to be >> ashamed of but rather reason to be proud. > >I think you'll find that the Samba team are quite familiar with this >opinion, especially in the context of the Samba TNG fork :) >

|................. | This would *possibly* map to the files of your | driver like this: | | Long Printer Name:\ --> lp:\ |........................... | missing: should be "RAW" !! ##### | | Yeah, you're right. I've missed the RAW DDT. Now | when I complied I got the error from the subject | line. | | Sorry? I didn't

Hi Kurt, I've read the new document. It's a very fine piece of technical documentation. However, it doesn't help me in the present predicament. Going now by this book I'm only getting more frustrated. I'm stuck! For example adding driver with rcpclient invariably ends in "Segmentation fault" (Signal 11) immediately after pop_sec_ctx, whose push counterpart was

We are planning to replace a quite big domain running W2K with Samba ( at the very least, the DC ). Though i'd love to have the extra security capabilities of W2K ( Kerberos ) as a DC, Samba/NT4 as PDC/BDC with ldapsam will more than suffice for now. The show-stopper right now is this: we need to be able to assign "real" Full Control permissions: a user who has "Full

Due to the LTO modifications to the build system it is not possible to do old non LTO builds that involve some old PIC behaviour, this means Cygwin and possible other platforms old behaviours is broken, and they are not LTO'ed yet either. Would it be possible to have both the old PIC behaviour and the new LTO based behavious coincide via a flags like --enable-lto=(yes,no) and for older PIC

I have grouped two capi controllers using * as the outgoing msn. when the first two channels are busy normally and I try to use a third channel the channels from the second controller are used. But when a channel is occupied by the capisuite fax and we need a third channel asterisk responds with "every one is busy congested at this time". I think the same behavious would have happened

----- Forwarded by Dragan Petkovski/IT/GZAOP on 01.12.2008 08:55 ----- From: Dragan Petkovski/IT/GZAOP To: rsync@lists.samba.org Date: 29.10.2008 08:52 Subject: rsync-3.0.4 install problem on z/OS USS Hi all! I would like to install rsync-3.0.4 on z/OS 1.9 USS. Make produce a lot off errors: cc -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c options.c -o options.o ERROR CCN3277 ./zlib/zlib.h:92