similar to: smbpasswd - Samba and LDAP

Hi, I'm trying to configure Samba 3.0.5 (3.0.4 earlier) with OpenLDAP 2.1.30: This is what I get when I try to find out more about the user Administrator (who was added with the populate script): aresjr scripts # pdbedit -Lv ak failed to add domain dn= sambaDomainName=ARESJR,dc=smallworld,dc=no with: Already exists Adding domain info for ARESJR failed with NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL failed to

Hi all, I have a setup like this. Pls let me know if it's possible or not. SAMBA + Local LDAP ---> SASLAUTHD --> Global LDAP Desc: I'd like to do Samba authentication to LDAP, passthrough to another LDAP using SASL. The current situation is: SSH authentication from LDAP user to that Samba box works. However, smb authentication doesn't work (yet). This is what's shown in

I've upgrade to Samba 3.0.4 a System wich it's running SLES 8. The System is working with LDAP and smbldap-tools 0.8.4 for managing users and groups. I'd like to manage the user and group with usrmgr.exe running into a Windows 2000. When I tried adding new user the programs didn't work and it's reported an error. The log system running in the PDC [SLES 8], reporting:

Hi list, I'm getting stuck at the replication part for my BDC. Could someone familiar with OpenLDAP replication shed some light? I'm sure that password is correct Thanks for taking a look at! 1. slapd.conf (master) # $OpenLDAP: pkg/ldap/servers/slapd/slapd.conf,v 1.23.2.8 2003/05/24 23:19:14 kurt Exp $ # # See slapd.conf(5) for details on configuration options. # # include

Hi folks. New to both dovecot and openldap. Trying to set up virtual domains using the wanderingbarque howto: http://www.wanderingbarque.com/mailserver.html Platform is RH enterprise 3. Only difference is I'm trying to use phamm instead of jamm: http://phamm.rhx.it/ dovecot doesn't seem to want to play nice with my openldap; everything else (postfix, etc) seems to work alright.

... with this error message: Preparing LDAP database... => bdb_tool_entry_put: id2entry_add failed: DB_KEYEXIST: Key/data pair already exists (-30996) => bdb_tool_entry_put: txn_aborted! DB_KEYEXIST: Key/data pair already exists (-30996) slapadd: could not add entry dn="dc=washcslab,dc=org" (line=5): txn_aborted! DB_KEYEXIST: Key/data pair already exists (-30996) Migration

Hi. I'm attempting to compile rsync 2.6.9 with both the acls & xattr patches on an MacBook pro (ie: Intel processor), with the latest Apple Developer Tools. While this is OS X client, I've enabled acls via "sudo /usr/bin/fsaclctl -p / -e" and rebooted, prior to attempting to compile rsync. Is there something else inherent in OS X Server perhaps, that I'm still

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7865 Summary: files or dirs with more than 16 ACLs are not rsynced correctly Product: rsync Version: 3.0.7 Platform: IA64 OS/Version: HP-UX Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Hello. I have some users IDs in different OUs with different passwords. Base OU for mail server is 'ou=Mail, dc=ph, dc=com' Trying manual search: # ldapsearch -b 'ou=Mail, dc=ph, dc=com' -D 'cn=bind, ou=Users, dc=ph, dc=com' -w XXX -s sub -h mainserv.ph.com '(&(objectClass=qmailUser)(uid=someuser))' uid mailMessageStore ? # extended LDIF ? uid: someuser

Look at the acl(5) man page and you'll see that the ACCESS CHECK ALGORITH starts: IF the effective user ID of the process matches the user ID of the file object owner ... ELSE IF the effective user ID of the process matches the qualifier of any entry of type ACL_USER, THEN IF the matching ACL_USER entry and the ACL_MASK entry contain the requested permissions, access is

> > With todays nightly: > > > > dsync(wsunpriv at iai.uni-bonn.de): Panic: file imapc-list.c: line 199 (imapc_list_get_vname): assertion failed: (strncmp(prefix, storage_name, prefix_len) == 0 && storage_name[prefix_len] == list->sep) > > Oh, and this would be good to solve too. What does it say with gdb: > > gdb dsync core > fr 5 > p prefix >

(gdb) bt full #0 mailbox_list_default_get_vname (list=0x21ceec0, storage_name=0x0) at mailbox-list.c:655 __s2_len = <optimized out> i = <optimized out> prefix_len = <optimized out> name_len = <optimized out> vname = 0x0 list_sep = <optimized out> ns_sep = <optimized out> ret = <optimized

Are their issues with Samba and Lustre working together? I remember something about turning oplocks off in samba, and while testing samba I noticed this [2010/08/27 17:30:59, 3] lib/util.c:fcntl_getlock(2064) fcntl_getlock: lock request failed at offset 75694080 count 65536 type 1 (Function not implemented) But I also found out about the flock option for lustre. Should I set flock on all

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 #$ setfacl -m u:mf:r bla #$ getfacl bla # file: bla # owner: root # group: root user::rw- user:mf:r-- group::r-- mask::r-- other::r-- It is readable by mf like intended. #$ chmod go-rwx bla #$ getfacl bla # file: bla # owner: root # group: root user::rw- user:mf:r-- #effective:--- group::r-- #effective:--- mask::--- other::--- It is not

I've run into a problem with `doveadm backup` (2.2 rc2 and 20130226) I did not notice in 2.1.15 doveadm backup [-Dv] -R -u cyrtest1 at iai.uni-bonn.de -m INBOX imapc: => crashes (signal 6 with acl plugin configured, sig 11 without acl) If this is considered a bug (not just because of the crash but in the meaning of "my configuration should work") it would be great if it could be

A bit of a minor off-topic issue, but on the off-chance that someone understands how ACLs work ... I've been trying to see if using default ACLs would help with the following issue: I have a third party application that is running as a non-root user ('user-a') and creating log files with mode 0600 (read/write only to the owner) in a log directory I have another application that

On 24/02/15 20:35, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 24/02/15 20:23, John wrote: >> I apologise for asking a basic question but I haven't been able to >> determine a sensible answer. >> >> I am using 4.1.17 as AD-DC. All configured and working with user home >> directories via [homes] and some other specific shares. >> >> Windows 7 client jointed to domain,

No material changes are made. --- Makefile | 10 +- convert.c => convert/convert.c | 803 +--------------------------------------- convert/convert.h | 76 ++++ convert/ext2.c | 791 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 873 insertions(+), 807 deletions(-) rename convert.c => convert/convert.c (74%) create mode

This is a PoC patch for NFSv4/ZFS ACLs. The objective of the patch is that rsync --acls support NFSv4/ZFS ACLs without requiring a new command line option NFSv4 ACLs can't be represented using POSIX draft ACLs, if an NFSv4 ACL is present a separate POSIX draft ACL will not be present and there are new APIs to access NFSv4 ACLs. So we need to distinguish between NFSv4 ACLs and POSIX ACLs in

Hi, This morning our CTDB managed cluster took a nosedive. We had member machines with hung smbd tasks which causes them to reboot, and the cluster did not come back up consistently. We eventually got it more or less stable with two nodes out of the 3, but we're still seeing worrying messages, eg we've just noticed: 2017/04/19 12:10:31.168891 [ 5417]: Vacuuming child process timed