similar to: Network Card

Zitat von Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu>: > using dovecot 1.2.17 here with maildir, still have to see > performance issues, but yes will move to ssd soon, i will just fix > problems that are here, not things that are not a problem, the above > will kill my server, so need to have an intel i7 with 25MB L1 cache, > so far i just keep it simple Look... if you want to

A few months ago we bought a GIS software. It is running under Windows XP Pro. This software has stored its databases in dbf files, located on one samba share. Executables reside on each WinXP Pro client. The software simply uses dbf databases located on samba share. Each session of the gis opens about 500 files. I have four workstations that are allowed to run this software. [kirchner]

Hi, I`ve find about BtrFS just this week, so I`ve not tested it so far. I`ll do it as soon as I got a spare disk to experiment with. But, I`ve two questions regarding BtrFS. First, do you plan inclusion of BtrFS into mainline kernel and if so, when do you expect this to happen? Second, I would like to see some more benchmarks of BtrFS, so far you provided comparison to Ext3 and XFS, which is

Please be patient with my ignorance if what I am asking is meaningless in any way. I am not too technically knowledgeable about filesystem internals but I am willing to learn. (I thought of posting to linux-ext4 but did not want to intrude within the technical threads with my layman thread.) From Wikipedia > ReiserFS article > Design section: [quote]ext2 and other Berkeley FFS-like

Now that I've been enlightened to the terrible write performance of ext3 on my new 3Ware RAID 5 array, I'm stuck choosing an alternative filesystem. I benchmarked XFS, JFS, ReiserFS and ext3 and they came back in that order from best to worst performer. I'm leaning towards XFS because of performance and because centosplus makes kernel modules available for the stock kernel.

Hello, I''m quite interested in ZFS, like everybody else I suppose, and am about to install FBSD with ZFS. On that note, i have a different first question to start with. I personally am a Linux fanboy, and would love to see/use ZFS on linux. I assume that I can use those ZFS disks later with any os that can work/recognizes ZFS correct? e.g. I can install/setup ZFS in FBSD, and later use

XFS is the best filesystem. David Weinehall wrote: >On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:33:13PM -0700, Dax Kelson wrote: > > >>On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 09:34, Peter Nelson wrote: >> >> >>>Hans Reiser wrote: >>> >>>I'm confused as to why performing a benchmark out of cache as opposed to >>>on disk would hurt performance? >>>

Hi, all. I see that the second alpha has been released, and that makes me wonder about one or two things: - Can you have a Samba 4 box be a DC alongside a Windows DC? - Failing that, is there a transition path from Windows AD to Samba 4? If either of these are true, it would save a heck of a lot of work, instead of having to rejoin a couple hundred clients to the domain. Thanks much, -Ken

Greetings all, I am curious if anyone knows why utilities such as 'GNU shred' (part of coreutils) and 'wipe' say they are not effective on journalled file systems- especially EXT3. Is it because you can't "guarantee" that the journal has been flushed/wiped (i.e. you have the journal 'between' you and the actual data blocks on the physical disk), or because

Hi there, I''ve just built xen & dom0 kernel from gentoo ebuilds (bugs.gentoo.org), but my dom0 kernel crashes during boot. Any help is appreciated. Console log, grub.conf and .config are included, machine is celeron/466, 128MB of RAM. Console log: Linux version 2.6.9-xen0 (root@zirafa) (gcc version 3.3.4 20040623 (Gentoo Linux 3.3.4-r1, ssp-3.3.2-2, pie-8.7.6)) #2 Sun Nov 14

Hi I plan to set up a big file server, something like motherboard with 4 ide ports and an additional 4 ide daughter card, a PIV proc and 512 or 1024 MB ram, a 100 or 1000 MB NIC, with 6 or 7 200 GB ide HDDs in a sigle box. I don't need lightning performance, just disk space. Of course this would be served by some linux os and samba questions (relative to samba configuration and behaviour) :

Hi there, I'm using rsync with some large trees of files (on one disk, we have 30M files, for example, and a we might be copying say, 500k files in one tree. The file trees are reasonably balenced -- no single directory has thousands of files in it, for example. Our file system, at the moment, is ext3. We are very comfortable with it, and are hesitant to switch away from it, though JFS or

I'm having a problem with an exclude list and I wanted to run it by the group before I cry "Bug!". Here's the scenario: I'm working on a script to selectively synchronize several directories with those on a server using rsync (version 3.0.5 protocol version 30). I am using the --exclude-from command option, and everything works, except when a directory I am specifying

Peter Nelson wrote: > Hans Reiser wrote: > > >Are you sure your benchmark is large enough to not fit into memory, > >particularly the first stages of it? It looks like not. reiser4 is > >much faster on tasks like untarring enough files to not fit into ram, > >but (despite your words) your results seem to show us as slower unless > >I misread them.... >

I don't think that XFS is a desktop filesystem at all. This is from XFS FAQ: qoute ------------ Q: Why do I see binary NULLS in some files after recovery when I unplugged the power? If it hurts don't do that! * NOTE: XFS 1.1 and kernels => 2.4.18 has the asynchronous delete path which means that you will see a lot less of these problems. If you still have not updated to the 1.1

I believe 30 sec is the default for the checkpoint interval.  Is this adjustable? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Hallo, we have a clinical system that generate lot of files that once written are never changed. This file consume lot of disk and tape space*, so my idea was to compress this files. The problem is that it can happen, that the users have to open this files later. Is there a VFS module for samba that show gzipped** read only files as if they were standard files ? Bye Andreas * Disks are

I was trying to run one of my kids favourite games with Wine, alas it crashes accessing a null pointer, early on while loading one of the sprite files (not corrupted). I guess the program should be doing better memory checking but since this works on Windows, maybe Wine has fed him before some broken data. Unfortunately, the terminal output doesn't seem much helpful:

Hi everyone, vmkit had two major improvements recently, so I guess I should let you know :). First, it does not require to patch llvm. So you can use your llvm TOT with it. There are some not-required arch-specific patches in case you encounter problems when executing large applications. These should be mainly for ppc external symbols and x86 SSE. Please post to llvm-dev your test-case if

Hi, It is possible using Harmony - http://harmony.apache.org instead of classpath? Harmony has Garbage Collector and class lib. And is there any plan port it to win32? Regards Eric "Nicolas Geoffray" > Hi everyone, > > vmkit had two major improvements recently, so I guess I should let you > know :). > > First, it does not require to patch llvm. So you can use