similar to: Samba 3.0.3pre1 - Linux 2.6.4 Freeze

I have made rsync 3.0.3pre1 available for release testing. This is another bug-fix release, with the only "enhancements" being some improved terminology in the rsyncd.conf manpage and some improvements in the testsuite. To see a summary of the changes since 3.0.2, visit this link: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src-previews/rsync-3.0.3pre1-NEWS You can download the source tar

I have made rsync 3.0.3pre1 available for release testing. This is another bug-fix release, with the only "enhancements" being some improved terminology in the rsyncd.conf manpage and some improvements in the testsuite. To see a summary of the changes since 3.0.2, visit this link: http://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/src-previews/rsync-3.0.3pre1-NEWS You can download the source tar

Hello, I am currently trying to setup Samba 3.0.3pre1 to share my freshly installed LaserJet. I have NOT had any printer until now, so I can't tell you if the behavior was different before 3.0.3pre1. The problem: My smb.conf contains: > [global] > ## Printing > load printers = yes > printcap name = cups > printing = cups > [printers] > comment

I'm having a problem involving Outlook and .pst files and a lock that is getting "stuck" I believe. Once Outlook crashes in the fashion it does, it is unable to reopen the file, claiming it is already in use. Explorer also does not let me access the file. Rebooting the workstation does not fix it. smbstatus does not show the lock, however hwen I show byte range locks, there is one,

Found interesting info on http://us1.samba.org/samba/ftp/pre/WHATSNEW-3.0.3pre1.txt Gerald (Jerry) Carter <jerry@samba.org> * Fixed iterator in tdbsam. * Fix bug that disabled accounts with a valid NT password hash, but no LanMan hash. Is this means we can have only sambaNTPassword without having sambaLMPassword attribute? it was allowed by the schema anyway. --beast

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.3 code base and is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended for production servers. However, there have been several bug fixes and new features added since 3.0.2a that we feel it is important make it available to the Samba community for wider testing. Common bugs fixed in this preview

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This is a preview release of the Samba 3.0.3 code base and is provided for testing only. This release is *not* intended for production servers. However, there have been several bug fixes and new features added since 3.0.2a that we feel it is important make it available to the Samba community for wider testing. Common bugs fixed in this preview

A month ago I mentioned on this list work on a automated package deployment tool for Windows systems, which is server agnostic. At the time, I didn't have the time to put it up in a place for public consumption. I do now. The utility is named wpkg (punny isn't it?) It's nothing more than a simple .js (jscript) file which needs to be run on Windows, from a directory containing three

Hello! I am using samba running as a PDC at our school. I have read many docs and howtos but I can't find anything about Concurrent logins. I would be a nice feature becouse I don't want my users to login more than one time. Is there anyone that does have a clue? Greetings from Sweden --- Mikael Karlsson Skoldataenheten, Tibro Kommun Sweden +4650414783 mikael.karlsson@edu.tibro.se

Just wondering if anybody out there actually downloaded and got my Wpkg utility working. I'd like to hear what people think about it. Not having a progect page for it and all doesn't make that easy. Hmm. Maybe i'll set up a sourceforge page. Anyways, anybody using it? (for those not aware, it's a utility to automatically install software on windows computers, without any specific

Hi, I was wondering if anyone has had any experience with using the Dfs functionality within Samba. I've been searching for any performance information and or documentation regarding Dfs in particular load balancing i.e. 1) How does it load balance? Is it some sort of round robin? 2) Is there a limit to the number of servers that can used in the load balance? 3) How many requests per

Caller id works on any device but asterisk. I have a zaptel 1 port card. any ideas on where I should start. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20040414/c79b3b3f/attachment.htm

On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 20:35, Chris Lattner wrote: > The problem is that the code generated by the C backend cannot include any > system headers. If the system header were to have a #define (not a rare > occurance) the header could arbitrarily change the CBE code in BAAD ways. > :( I was thinking of Eric doing something like: myfile.c: #include <string.h> #include

> You don't need to do this to get those annoying GCC warnings. They come > out whenever you compile a C program produced by the LLVM CBE that uses > certain GCC "builtins", like memcpy... :( > > -Chris That's weird. Perhaps GCC knows about its own builtin functions and the prototypes for them so that if you declare a similar function with the wrong prototype

Hi, We are using Asterisk running on FreeBSD, as IVR / Voicemail for SER. We have redirected certain calls from SER to *. On * there is some 'testing' extension. It's simply playing some demo now ;-) As long as I use plain G.711 the sound is nice. When I switch to G.729 the sound is choppy, not recognizable. What is going on? Debug shows everything is normal.. I understand that all

I've already installed * 0.9.0. All calls from my GS phone has no ringing sound but the other end rings! I also checked this with my CVS archive. The problem exists in CVSs from (Mar 6) up to now. and I have no problem with my Xten softphone when calling with it. anybody can help? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi all, It appears that something very strange is going on... Here's the deal -- whether someone calls in to my * server or I call out (doesn't matter), I can hear them perfectly: no gaps, no packet loss, nothing ... however, when I speak there seems to be very noticable latency and "choppiness" as if there were packetloss or lots of jitter. I'm using SIP for outgoing

I have a couple of real quick questions for ya'll. I am trying to setup * in a test scenario to emulate my company's 20 agent ACD. 1) First, I am curious if anyone has any configs that they can throw up on the wiki or just send via e-mail. I have a bit of it pieced together and am able to make some very basic queued calls, but I am sure that there are much smarter people out there

Having a bit of trouble understanding, or getting, "ldap passwd sync" working. I assume, setting it to Yes, would make it issue a change password command to the ldap server, just like pam does, ldappasswd does, or any other ldap program. Right? What does only do? -- Jerry Haltom <jhaltom@feedbackplusinc.com> Feedback Plus, Inc.

I'd like to thank the Samba team for making our switch off of Active Directory amazingly smooth. We're a small company, only 30 desktops, but things went great for us. Actually, nobody even notices the Windows DC is even gone! The Exchange migration that went along with this wasn't as hassle free though. =( It's really refreshing to be able to SSH into our file server and see