similar to: Fwd: fsck'ing a mounted fs

Hi. Is there any reasonable possibility to check a mounted fs for errors? It would be useful to have server-filesystems (and harddisks) checked periodically on machines that are only rebooted by hardware-failures ;-) Regards, Christian -- * Christian A. Lademann, ZLS Software GmbH mailto:lademann@zls.de * ZLS Software GmbH * Frankfurter Strasse 59 Postfach 1628

Hi. What is the state of ext2resize for Ext3? How about the online-ext3-patch? Regards, Christian -- * Christian A. Lademann, ZLS Software GmbH mailto:lademann@zls.de * ZLS Software GmbH * Frankfurter Strasse 59 Postfach 1628 mailto:zls@zls.de * D-65779 Kelkheim D-65766 Kelkheim http://www.zls.de * Telefon +49-6195-9902-0 Telefax

** ** I posted this message quite a time ago. Some people use my patch and I ** receive queries for a recent version from time to time. This patch didn't ** make it into the mainstream distribution yet. Sorry. ** ** This is the updated version for Samba-1.9.17p1. ** Hello, people. I have implemented some enhancements for Samba: 1. dynamic configuration-values 2. configurable

Hi, * gurus, I wonder if there is a way to alert the in-house extension(s) in case of an incoming external call without actually answering it, before somebody picks up the phone on one of the extensions? This way the caller wouldn't have to pay for the call until somebody answers. Regards, Christian Lademann

Hi, I was surprised that apply and sapply don't return the same results in the example below. Can someone tell me what I'm missing? > zls <- function(x) character(0) > m <- matrix(0, nrow=2, ncol=2) > apply(m, 1, zls) character(0) > sapply(m, zls) [[1]] character(0) [[2]] character(0) [[3]] character(0) [[4]] character(0) > R.version _

Hello, I would like to use cv.tree to run a 10-fold cross-validation experiment on a tree object to help me choose a tree size. Many users seem to allow their cases to be assigned to CV groups randomly, but I have assigned each case to one of 10 cv groups, such that the data from each of my experimental units is included in only one cv-group. According to the manual for the tree Package

Here's one last plea for help from the list before I give up on the totally cool software FAX modem concept in complete despair (for now, at least, until I have more time to dig into it).... I am simply not able to successfully receive a FAX no matter what device I transmit from or how I bring the call into Asterisk. My lastest effort was a call from a Pitney-Bowes FAX machine into an X100P

Hey! I have some RHEL6 hypervisors and the VMs are in raw qemu image files in a local raid array linux raid + lvm + ext3. When a kernel update is installed a reboot is necessary, usually it has been more than 180 days since the last reboot and the file system is fsck'd and this takes 2-3 hours. I am curious to know if there is any documentation that addresses the pro's and con's of

Hi people, I ran into one of these silly issues I'd like to share as I think the reason behind it may be a flaw in the current initrds. The setup; Dual-Xeon Intel-chipset motherboard. SATA-disk attached to ICH, onboard Adaptec SCSI-controller. Installed system, updated packages, no problems. Basic, non-LVM partition setup - OS-disk is /dev/sda, single filesystem-partition /dev/sda1 is

Hey folks, I searched the list archives and found this : echo "AUTOFSCK_TIMEOUT=5" > /etc/sysconfig/autofsck echo "AUTOFSCK_DEF_CHECK=yes" >> /etc/sysconfig/autofsck http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2006-November/029837.html http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-September/thread.html#81934 Will this do all disks? I want to do a reboot of a couple

Hi, can anyone give me an example of when an fsck would repair something that the ext3 driver would not? with full "data=journal" journaling, would fsck ever need to be run if all the partitions were ext3? the ext3 mini-howto refers to "certain rare hardware failure cases (e.g. hard drive failures)" that would require a filesystem check, but doesn't go into details.

The 03/07/13, Jamie Fargen wrote: > Hey! > > I have some RHEL6 hypervisors and the VMs are in raw qemu image files in a > local raid array linux raid + lvm + ext3. When a kernel update is installed > a reboot is necessary, usually it has been more than 180 days since the > last reboot and the file system is fsck'd and this takes 2-3 hours. > > I am curious to know if

Hi - I've been asked to turn on autofsck on ext3 filesystems for CentOS 4 and 5 servers on reboot after a crash by adding AUTOFSCK_TIMEOUT=5 AUTOFSCK_DEF_CHECK=yes to the file /etc/sysconfig/autofsck Is this necessary for ext3 filesystems? Is this a safe thing to do for a ext3 filesystems? I haven't used autofsck since the ext2 days. -- Agile --

Hi all, I have a strong Dell server running RHEL5.5 every now and then the server hangs (SSH access is frozen) and when attemping to login the prompt hangs and after a while the message " can't update CMOS clock from 2 to 47 CIFS VFS No respone for cmd 114 mid 188" only a reboot causes it to work properly again. i tried fsck'ing with no luck. I must say the server does work very

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, This may or may not be a bug. However, it is DEFINITELY NOT how I would expect and want to see sshd work! If you run lsof against sshd on a privilege separated user, it shows that sshd's CWD is /. I would hope that the CWD would be at a minimum /var/empty/sshd and I would really have thought it would be something along the lines of

I have a test 4.x-stable system that I recently rebooted into. The last time I had updated it was May 3rd. I cvsup'ed it, did the buildworld/installworlds, and everything seemed fine. I then thought I would update all the ports. When upgrading XFree86, the /usr partition ran out of disk space. Now the partition shows up as: (21) df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity

Hi, I'm trying to set up two ACT SIP/IAX capable phones to communicate with each other on the same internal network, using asterisk 1.0.9 on SuSE 9.3 (because I intend to grow the situation after this basic setup is functioning) The phone IPs are set to 192.168.0.201 and 202 respectively. I've had a look at iax.conf and extensions.conf but cannot see how to tie these IPs to an

Hi! Are these results i got from my benchmarking "normal" or is there something strange happening in my system? This box is going to be a mailserver, so i tested various fs to decide on which i should utilize. I personally dislike reiserfs because it has proven somehow unreliable on our servers (although it got better in the more recent kernels), ext3 would be quite good (fsck'ing

excuse the newbie nature of the post, we recently inherited a linux server which has ext3 on it and we have encountered problems before being afforded the opportunity to properly educate ourselves... We had a situation where the server froze and required a hard restart. On reboot we get the following notices which were captured in the dmesg log EXT3-fs: INFO: recovery required on readonly