similar to: Samba 3, openldap, follow symlinks doesn't work

Hi I cant get the user auth to work. Do anyone have any suggestions. See config below ---/etc/rsyncd.conf--- log file = /var/log/rsyncd.log pid file = /var/run/rsyncd.pid lock file = /var/run/rsync.lock uid = rsync gid = users [user1_dir] path = /home/rsync comment = user1 test bibliotek read only = false auth users = user1 secrets file =

Hi all! I'm configuring Samba 3.0.1 on Solaris 9 (rel s9_58shwpl3) Sparc. Have successfully installed Ldap libs, Krb5 libs, and, finally - Samba. Trying to join W2KSP4 domain. net rpc join -S dc01 -U Administrator Gives bash-2.05# /usr/local/samba/bin/net rpc join -S dc01-tmn -U Administrator Password: Joined domain MYDOMAIN. Now i start winbindd. The smb.conf file is:

Hello, we are trying to upgrade from 2.0.5a to 2.0.6 (under Digital Unix and Windows 95 clients). After the upgrade we get a lot of errors like these: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Log <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Jan 4 16:18:35 fissio smbd[31799]: [2000/01/04 16:18:35, 0] smbd/service.c:make

Hi Brian, On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 01:20:46 -0800, brian lamb via samba wrote: > Configured as you mention, and prior with the other tweaks I had in the first place, Im getting the same results, which is "FSUTIL utility requires a Local NTFS Volume", and mapping it. Hmm, this works fine for me against a Samba 4.4.2 Btrfs backed Samba share. smb.conf: [global] ... store dos

On Thu, July 30, 2020 17:23, Robert Marcano wrote: > On 7/30/20 5:00 PM, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: >> FreeBSD-12.1p7 >> Samab-4.10.15 running in FreeBSD Jail >> >> >> I just wish to ensure that my conclusion respecting Samba, FreeBSD Jails, and >> NTP is correct. >> >> 1. Unless configured otherwise Windows domain clients will query and

Hello In 2 different subnets I have setup 2 identical samba servers (RH 6.5) as fileservers for windows clients. Each is a member of it's own AD Domain (Windows 2003 Servers). The problem: one of them only is accessible and sharing locally. On the windows-client, trying to mount a share gives this error: C:\Users\testuser>net use y: \\samba_server\topfolder /user:testuser System

Hi All Folks. I encountered following problem WinXP can't connect Samba_Server but Samba_Server can connect WinXP for files sharing WinXP box and Samba_Server are connected directly via a crossover cable as experiment. Firewall of WinXP is off and ipchains on Samba_Server also off. (Remark: The WinXP box has been tested via direct connection with a crossover cable to a WinME box/Win98

I've been searching and researching this and I can't seem to find the answers I'm looking for. I'd like to setup a Samba PDC that Windows clients will join. The PDC will use an LDAP backend to get authorization information (username, home directory, etc). The authentication portion is handled by an MIT Kerberos KDC. I think I'm real close to having it all together but I'm

FreeBSD-12.1p7 Samab-4.10.15 running in FreeBSD Jail I just wish to ensure that my conclusion respecting Samba, FreeBSD Jails, and NTP is correct. 1. Unless configured otherwise Windows domain clients will query and obtain their time from the samba_server DC. 2. Samba_server obtains its time from the OS, in this case a FreeBSD Jail. 3. FreeBSD Jails get their time from their host. 4. If

On Wed, July 22, 2020 14:48, Rowland penny wrote: > On 22/07/2020 19:40, James B. Byrne via samba wrote: >> >> On Wed, July 22, 2020 12:35, James B. Byrne wrote: >>> FreeBSD-12.1p7 jail running Samba-4.10.15 on ZFS. >>> >>> When I run 'samba-tool domain backup offline targetdir=/tmp' I see this: >>> >>> running backup on dirs:

I am working on a FreeBSD jail (12.1p4) using samba410. I have joined this service to our existing Samab DC DOMAIN using samba-tool domain join. This worked as far as I can tell. I have these entries in smb4.conf # BOF # Global parameters [global] netbios name = SAMBA-02 realm = BROCKLEY-2016.HARTE-LYNE.CA server role = active directory domain controller workgroup = BROCKLEY-2016

For some reason It's not erroring now, I will look into it more, but I suspect it鈥檚 the settings, the last thing mentioned David > [globa]l section is fine, as long as it's not also set in the share section. So, yeah, that may have fixed im for the time being not getting the sparse errors, for the first time in 4 months, however, there is a couple other problems, so hopefully they

Hello, samba. I upgraded samba 2.2.5 to samba 2.2.6 in Debian 3.0. Both versions was built myself by script "rules binary". Before: Our network have a few of W2KSP2.rus and a few of W2KSP2RP1.rus. All workstations can logon to samba 2.2.5. After: W2KSP2.rus can't login to samba 2.2.6, though W2KSP2RP1.rus still can logon to PDC on samba 2.2.6. W2KSP2 tells me, that it can not find

On Mon, July 13, 2020 10:23, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 2020-07-13 15:06, James B. Byrne wrote: > >>> Just out of curiosity, are you also using vfs_zfsacl? >> >> Yes. > > But only on DC1, AFAICT! > I see no mention of it on DC2's smb.conf. > That could be the reason why you have two different behaviour. > > bye > av. > That appears to

Hi All, Hope someone here can help me ? *See end for background and system information... I'm looking for advice or links to clear documentation on the use and configuration of "net vampire" and it's ability to download PDC accounts with passwords intact. I have successfully used "net vampire" to synchronize my Samba BDC -- with my companies PDC. I've switched

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ******************************************************************** The contents of this email are intended exclusively for the addressee. If you are not the addressee you must not read use or disclose the email contents ; you should notify us immediately [ by clicking "Reply" ] and delete this email. Nationwide monitors e-mails to ensure its systems

Hello, Samba version: 3.5.6, OS CentOS 5.5 64-bit. The problem: I have a share with symlinks leading outside the share. After mounting the shared resource (cifs), I can't proceed through symlinks (permission denied). Setting options follow symlinks = yes wide links = yes for the share doesn't change Samba behaviour. Could someone enlighten me on how to handle this? Thanks.

A while back I got some good advice about using bind-mount on my Linux server to include directories outside my Samba shares. It had been years since I set up a server and forgot about "follow symlinks" and stumbled on that yesterday. Is there a reason for using one of these over the other one? Hal

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13569 Bug ID: 13569 Summary: --link-dest may follow symlinks and failure to hard link a non-regular file is fatal Product: rsync Version: 3.1.3 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi gang: I am writing a function to manually install a package from the fileserver, without using the native package management system (in this case, yum). This is useful when we, for whatever reason, don''t wish to install the latest package from yum using the built-in support for installing packages. In the process, I''ve found what appears to be a bug. If a file does not