similar to: Re: specified network name no more available

On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, Alexander Lazarevich wrote: > Samba guru's: > > Our Samba 3 network performance is half that of Windows 2003 > Server. I really want to stay with samba/unix, but half the > performance? I'm hoping someone can point me in the right > direction so we can keep using samba/unix. I'll try to give > as much detail without giving pages and pages

Hi there! * I put my printer drivers on the [print$] share * Did everything as described in the Samba-Howto Colletcion (made the first connection as root, etc.) * Connected to the printers with a normal user and now I cannot change the default print options allthough the user is in the local Administrators group. Everything is grayed out. Any idea what I am doing wrong? Thank you. +r

>> I was stung by this bug yesterday myself and although >> there are numerous references to this error message >> I haven't seen any qualified resolution of the problem. >> .......... >> ... Because I think someone >> from the Samba team should shed some light on the >> topic and explain under what circumstances this >> pathological behavious

Hi Sambatistas, a few days ago there was a discussion, how to force jobs runas administrator at netlogon. If you use a default.bat at netlogon this is executed as the logon user , therefor you are running in rights problems if you wanna execute job which need admin right like regedit /s . I found myself in this problem too, pushing the user to use the logon screensaver as default, i created a reg

Hello List, i try to build up a samba/ldap pdc using samba 3.0.1 and ldapsmb-1.0. It seems that ldapsmb-1.0 did not work with samba 3.0 in non compat mode. Searching for a newer version was frustrating. The only thing i found were dead links to ldapsmb-1.2. If i look inside all this samba mailing lists, it seems that erverybody is using ldapsmb with samba 3.0. Something is going wrong and i

Hi Volker, Jordan Coleman, Murray Taylor, David Kennel, Frederic Corne and Stephen Jones all wrote about the problem of a specified network intermittently reported "no longer available" when writing to a file. It's the same problem which I complained about on April 7. I then assumed it had to do with the presence of a w2k3 server in the domain. The problem disappeared after I

On Tue, July 12, 2016 12:19 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > > Got an older Dell R410, with an LSI 1068E PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS > (rev 08). It *appears* that a) trying MegaRaid, and b) from what I'm > googling, that what I need are mptfusion-related packages. > Unfortunately, yum shows me nothing available in base, epel, or > rpmfusion. Am I looking for

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:20 AM, Tony Mountifield <tony at softins.clara.co.uk > wrote: > > If I do this from an NEC digital extension I get 141496920000, but if I > do > > it from an NEC POTS extension I get 1942124000 > > That looks like when you pick up the analogue phone and dial 9, it > immediately opens the outgoing line and sends the 141 acces code, but >

On Thu, September 21, 2017 12:42 pm, Joseph L. Casale wrote: >> Than was my first reaction when I realized that logged in with GUI (X11) >> user can turn off (and on) network interfaces. Without being in sudoers >> file. > > Would not being in sudoers prevent them from pulling the cord out? The > rational for the control is well justified for users with multiple >

Hi Damien, Damien Miller wrote on Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:04:41PM +1000: > ok, djm@ Thanks for checking, and thanks to Val and Michael for testing. I just committed the patch to OpenBSD, others will likely take care of merging it to -portable. > (I'd prefer the comment before the return statement, but up to you) Immediately before the return statement, it looked really confusing,

On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 at 00:35, Bruce Hoult <brucehoult at sifive.com> wrote: > Yes, I'd expect only a tiny fraction of commits to change the interface between say, clang and llvm in an incompatible way, but where they do it's essential to get both sides at the same time if you want to to have every commit buildable for things such as bisection or incremental rebasing (as I think

Due to the LTO modifications to the build system it is not possible to do old non LTO builds that involve some old PIC behaviour, this means Cygwin and possible other platforms old behaviours is broken, and they are not LTO'ed yet either. Would it be possible to have both the old PIC behaviour and the new LTO based behavious coincide via a flags like --enable-lto=(yes,no) and for older PIC

I have grouped two capi controllers using * as the outgoing msn. when the first two channels are busy normally and I try to use a third channel the channels from the second controller are used. But when a channel is occupied by the capisuite fax and we need a third channel asterisk responds with "every one is busy congested at this time". I think the same behavious would have happened

The sieve-extprograms extension strips Return-Path headers before passing mail off to the external program. The patch to remove this behavious is trivial (and attached), but since it appears to be deliberate I felt I should investigate further. I believe this is basically a cut-and-paste error. The code to strip Return-Path has been there since the sieve-pipe plugin for Dovecot 1.x, and I believe

Hi, I just started using FLAC and am very impressed. However I have run into a problem with the current (and other) Windows executables. If I encode with a higher compression level (say 7 or 8) I stand a high probability of BSODing or just plain rebooting. Strangely enough this behavious seems to go away if I use the default 5 compression level. Has anyone else had problems

Full_Name: Xiao Gang FAN Version: 2.0.0 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (82.226.247.142) After installing the new version 2.0.0 (downloaded binary), I've got 2 unexpected behavious vs 1.9.1: 1. When installing some packages from source, the making process stoped with the following message: ---------- Making package toto ------------ adding build stamp to DESCRIPTION making DLL

I'm attempting to configure Samba 3.0.4 to work with Windows 2003 Active Directory, mapping users' home directories automatically. Currently we use this method in production with Windows 2000 but wish to migrate to 2003. The problem seems to be Kerberos related. I was able to join the Linux box (RedHat 9) to the AD. I can do a "kinit <username>" successfully. Klist shows a

Hi, I'm trying to get Samba 3.0.2 working against a Windows 2003 Active Directory. I can join the Linux box (RedHat Advanced Server) to the domain using "net ads join" and it appears in the Windows machine's Users and Computers snap in but when trying to map a drive from Windows you just get a continuous password dialog bog and on the Linux box Samba produces the following error

Reposting this with a subject line :-) Hi, I'm trying to get rsync over OpenSSH/Cygwin working. I started with a command like this (which fails): $ rsync -v -v -v --recursive --rsh="ssh -i /home/ul081b/mpdm-keys/rsa-mpdm01mpdm@mpdm-w2k3" MPDM-W2K3::MPDM . opening connection using ssh -i /home/ul081b/mpdm-keys/rsa-mpdm01 mpdm@mpdm-w2k3 MPDM-W2K3 rsync --server --daemon . bash:

Hi, i''m a little bit stuck here with creating a HVM-Windows (w2k3) Guest under Xen 3.1. I''m using ubuntu 7,10 with a 2.6.22.16-xen-patched kernel which seems to be stable for single cpu-linux guests. Cpu is a Q6600 and XD,VT and VT-d is enabled in the bios. When i create the windows guest with ''xm create w2k3 -c" (conf below) I get: "Started domain