similar to: ext3 0.9.1 doubt

I get 2 rejects applying 2.2.19-ext3 to latest errata rh 2.2.19 kernel. 1) fs/buffer.c Should I put "J_ASSERT(buf->b_count > 0);" before or after " *(int *)0 = 0;"? ===== ext3 0.0.7a patch --- 934,946 ---- if (buf->b_count) { buf->b_count--; + if (!buf->b_count && + (buf->b_jlist != BJ_None && buf->b_jlist

Hi, as I mentioned in earlier mail to ext3-users I have been getting some corruption on an ext3 filesystem that has been serving NFS. I am now confident that I fully understand the problem and have a patch. It only affects data=journal mode and I wonder if it might also be the cause of the corruption noted by a number of people on linux-kernel. First I will explain the problem. Then display

SYSTEM: rh6x based system, 2.2.19-6.2.7 rh errata kernel + 0.0.7a patch, I rebuilt rpm for i686; celeron466, 64MB, PIIX4. root fs is on software raid1 ext2, 6 additional fs's on software raid1 ext2. There's a 3rd HD, not mirrored, which is mounted ext3. EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. I enabled journal with tune2fs -j with unmounted fs. The 3 HDs are tuned with

Hello all, I am trying to integerate 0.0.6b with our kernel RPM here and have come across an interesting conflict. I want to include the raid patch that Red Hat includes in their kernel but that patch includes the following hunk: --- linux/include/linux/fs.h.orig Tue Jan 16 13:30:09 2001 +++ linux/include/linux/fs.h Tue Jan 16 13:47:18 2001 @@ -191,6 +191,7 @@ #define BH_Req 3 /* 0 if the

Hi Stephen, I'm one of developers of SnapFS, which based on Ext3. I got Assertion failure from SnapFS, at ext3_new_block() in fs/ext3/balloc.c: J_ASSERT (!test_and_set_bit(BH_Alloced, &bh->b_state)) If J_ASSERT is only use as debug, why it will modify data? I found the 'BH_Alloced' flag only occures at two place: one is balloc.c as above, the other is at journal_forget() in

In 2.4.20-pre5 an optimisation was made to the ext3 fsync function which can very easily cause file data corruption at unmount time. This was first reported by Nick Piggin on November 29th (one day after 2.4.20 was released, and three months after the bug was merged. Unfortunate timing) This only affects filesystems which were mounted with the `data=journal' option. Or files which are

Hi, I've switched the mailing list manager for the tinc lists from Majordomo to Listar today, for the users this change is fully transparent and for the list owners it just means bounce messages are handled by the system instead of by hand. The only minor change is that you may need to adjust your mail filters since the "Sender:" field now points to

Hi, I've switched the mailing list manager for the tinc lists from Majordomo to Listar today, for the users this change is fully transparent and for the list owners it just means bounce messages are handled by the system instead of by hand. The only minor change is that you may need to adjust your mail filters since the "Sender:" field now points to

IMO, First secure your entry points.. Mail webserver and proxy and the exit points. ( your users environment in my case windows 7/10 desktops.) Im waiting until trevor has the antivirus vfs is ready for samba 4. @David Disseldrop, you know the status about that, since it was you call to get it in samba. ;-) (https://github.com/fumiyas/samba-virusfilter/issues/23) I've seen good work but

This is a 2.2.19 machine with ext3-0.0.7a and quota support running. The symptoms are a particular NFS export hangs (for linux clients but not Solaris clients?) the local filesystem gives the following: EXT3-fs warning (device sd(8,49)): ext3_free_blocks: bit already cleared for block 2213 EXT3-fs error (device sd(8,49)): ext3_free_blocks: Freeing blocks not in datazone - block = 1563120916,

On 06/28/2017 07:13 AM, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > IMO, > > First secure your entry points.. Mail webserver and proxy and the exit points. ( your users environment in my case windows 7/10 desktops.) > > Im waiting until trevor has the antivirus vfs is ready for samba 4. > @David Disseldrop, you know the status about that, since it was you call to get it in samba. ;-)

Hai, Not really a question for samba technical, but i can share this. No need for setting things on samba, that wont help a lot. Below is my setup and its just how you configure your pc's. This and almost all other "malware" is EASY to block, but it wil have impact on how your work. First, start with NEVER work/run as user with administrator rights. If one needs it, then not

From: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> Using static_cpu_has() is pointless on those paths, convert them to the boot_cpu_has() variant. No functional changes. Reported-by: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit at gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp at suse.de> Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li at intel.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen at intel.com> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux

We have a share on a Windows 2000 Server that is mounted onto a RedHat box using the following entry in fstab: //server/filesystem /opt/bumvfs smbfs username=username,password=password,debug=4,dmask=777,fmask=777,sockopt= SO_KEEPALIVE 0 0 On this we create a directory structure such as: \dodgy_test\wxy2\VFStp\VFSnetwork_entities\VFSCommonReports\VFSGM_H\VFSR

i everybody! first at all, sorry about my poor english... i''m working in a little experiment about boucing objects using Effect.Move implementation and a couple Effect.Transitions'' but... i was stuck in the way how Effect.Move works. I need to move a object in two dimensions: X and Y, but in different times.... Effect.Parallel not work for me, because meanwhile the object

Hi Vickie (and others). I think I spoke a bit soon... at least on the global default settings... There are still a few strange things going on... My situation is slightly different from yours (I think). My users don't necessarily have logins on the linux server. I probably should use "security = share" - but with this setting - I couldn't get the driver upload to work. When

Currently, local and remote TLB flushes are not performed concurrently, which introduces unnecessary overhead - each INVLPG can take 100s of cycles. This patch-set allows TLB flushes to be run concurrently: first request the remote CPUs to initiate the flush, then run it locally, and finally wait for the remote CPUs to finish their work. In addition, there are various small optimizations to avoid

I've not been happy with the stories about the "stable" 2.4.x kernels. Everywhere I read people saying "not for production use". Would you recommend adding ext3 to 2.2.19 (ext3-0.0.7a) or moving to 2.4.1x and using ext3 there (ext3-0.9.12)? -- -IAN! Ian! D. Allen Ottawa, Ontario, Canada idallen@ncf.ca Home Page on the Ottawa FreeNet: http://www.ncf.ca/~aa610/

Yes, I'm listening to Aardvark Recorders Present: Local Players - one.mp3 So you want to syndicate? Or you want both localplayers and the LPBN to just share stuff. Anyway I like the idea and am ready to move ahead. I have a bulletin board on the LPBN for the radio station but I think if I create a mail group it will be easier to communicate with all the people that are building the

Hi folks, I'm trying to access a shared printer on a windows machine. The windows box (call it "Doze") is located behind a router/printserver, and is set up thus: -DOZE connects to the printer via the printserver using the PRTMATE port, and then shares the printer via smb -- workgroup CHASS, server name HIS-FACLAB, printer name his-fac-lex -Router forwards all incoming connections