similar to: smbusers and smbpasswd

Hi Everyone, This is a follow-up question on Samba. After doing rpm to reinstall the dependencies on libcups.so.2 and libssl.so.2. Samba went on fine. My question is regarding Client machines Win98 could not log on to the samba server. This gave me an error message --> The share name was not found. Be sure you typed it correctly. As far as I can remember I did the following on my samba box.

Greetings: I've been following through the instructions on how to connect an APC BackUPS 650 ES to USB, and have it monitored with NUT... I know my system can SEE the UPS, as DMESG shows this: hiddev96: USB HID v1.10 Device [APC Back-UPS ES 650 FW:818.w1.D USB FW:w1] on usb-0000:00:04.2-1 usbcore: registered new driver usbhid drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: v2.6:USB HID core driver I can see

?Bump. Can someone from dovecot dev team please respond something to my problem ? I've provided all the possible information, and if not please tell me. Or do you only provide support for your own FTS solution bundled with the paid version of dovecot-pro ? If so, you should clearly state it in the wiki. Thanks Le 19/04/2018 ? 10:30, kadafax at gmail.com a ?crit?: > I think I'm

Le 21/05/2018 ? 11:46, Aki Tuomi a ?crit?: > That message is coming from the temporary raw user, not from the actual > user. > > How did you verify that the FTS indexes are not created or updated > automatically? I send an email containing a specific strings ('thahB8ea' in that case) and search agains it: # doveadm search -u username mailbox INBOX body thahB8ea --> No

can you try turning on pluign { fts_enforced = yes } and repeat your test? Aki On 21.05.2018 13:31, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > Le 21/05/2018 ? 11:46, Aki Tuomi a ?crit?: >> That message is coming from the temporary raw user, not from the actual >> user. >> >> How did you verify that the FTS indexes are not created or updated >> automatically? > I send an

I think I'm progressing: if I create a brand new user, send her an email, it will not be indexed right away. I need to doveadm rescan / index the Inbox before. At the end of this email, a dovecot's debug log snipset (grep'ed on this user). In it I can read: "Debug: fts: Indexes disabled for namespace '' Can this be a problem ? Thanks doveconf -n output: # 2.2.34

That message is coming from the temporary raw user, not from the actual user. How did you verify that the FTS indexes are not created or updated automatically? Aki On 04.05.2018 12:47, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > ?Bump. Can someone from dovecot dev team please respond something to my > problem ? I've provided all the possible information, and if not please > tell me. > Or do

Help! I have been using dovecot for some years with great success. A little while ago, I changed my mail server from Fedora to CentOS linux. I reinstalled dovecot, and *almost* everything seems to be working, but one thing. There's *one* user I can't get it to work on without a workaround. The user is "newuser" and the uid is 1111 (actual name and number changed to protect

When adding a new user using throw smbpasswd and the SID to be added already exists in tdbsam database, an error message is displayed like that: hostname# "( echo 'password'; echo 'password' ) | smbpasswd -as 'newuser'" Unable to modify TDB passwd ! Error: Record exist Unable to modify TDB passwd ! Error: Record exists occured while storing the RID index

Hi, I used to set up Samba password on the command line with smbpasswd using the following syntax : smbpasswd -a newuser "usersecretpasswd" smbpasswd -e newuser but it does work any more. How can I do the same without having to type in the password ? Thanks in advance. Michel

I have two instances of an openldap-2.4.39 server running with syncrepl in a master-master replication setup. These are Centos 7.1 test servers which have been running for over 2 months now with no problems. Partly the good behavior of the LDAP servers is due to very little exercise. Yesterday I decided to try and see exactly how well replication was working. With server-2 up and running I

I am running Samba version 3.0.9-1.3E.2 on a server that is joined to a windows server 2003 domain using ADS security. The samba server hosts a share called 'files'. I am having problems mounting this share using a new account I set up. getent passwd shows the information for the new account as does wbinfo -u. Mounting the share with the new users account using the net use command

After upgrading to 3.4.0, I can no longer add new users. Any users that were added beforehand work fine. Any users that I attempt to create cannot login (error: NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE). I was able to get one new user account to work (see below), but I cannot add any new users. The server is Ubuntu 9.10 running Samba 3.4.0. I am using: security = user pam password change = yes Updating

Using the "hidups" driver produces better results, however, I'm not sure if these "unhandled events" errors are good or bad.. I would suspect bad... Any direction would be appreciated.. Thanks, Richard. root@excalibur:/usr/src/nut-2.0.5-pre2# ./drivers/hidups -u root -DDDD -a apc /dev/usb/hiddev0 Network UPS Tools: HID UPS driver 0.13 (2.0.5-pre2) Warning: This is an

Dear all, on CentOs7 based linux w. different versions of Samba (4.6.x from CentOS repos, but also Sernet-Samba-4.7.4 and also compiled from source), "wbinfo -i user at domain.tld" returns different results before the first successful authentication of the user. Server joined as member to Active Directory, idmapping via tdb2. On first attempt, the result returns

Thank you very much, Rowland! Very helpful. But do you say that the change in the output of „wbinfo -i“ is expected after the user has logged in? Should the use of „domain.realm“ vs „NTDOMAIN“ not be consistent, no matter if the user has logged in or not? Many regards, Heiner Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 11.03.2018 um 16:09 schrieb Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org>: > >

Of course SVM is for supervise learning method (classification or regression). You cannot use a boat to fly man !   Justin BEM BP 1917 Yaoundé Tél (237) 99597295 (237) 22040246 ________________________________ Envoyé le : Mardi, 5 Mai 2009, 16h07mn 10s Objet : Re : [R] Support Vector Machines Thank you. I will look this later but I think i've saw this function and i'm not sure

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Here is a description of what I am trying to do (with Samba 3.0.2a & openldap 2.1.27): I have all my users populated into the LDAP with all the applicable attributes; Users can map drives to a server using LDAP as the authentication backend without issue. Where I am running into problems is bringing up a PDC using Samba w/LDAP. * I added

On 21/10/15 17:37, Ole Traupe wrote: > I think I finally managed to understand the [homes] part of the man > pages, and what my problem is: > https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages/smb.conf.5.html > > The misunderstanding comes from my practice I learned on Windows to > just share the "\\server\home" directory and to create per-user > sub-folders

Well, I do. That is not the problem. The problem was that I wasn't used to have user homes to be shares themselves. And when I share \\server\home and want to have the folder \\server\home\newuser to be auto-created, but I actually connect to the share [home] (\\server\home), this section in the smb.conf is always found and so the special [homes] section is never executed (cloned).