similar to: vfs module load

I have this one remaining issue before I can declare my Samba rollout to be successful. I have been trying to implement the recycle feature. My server is a Dell Intel, with Redhat Enterprise 3.0 Linux and Samba 3.0.14 (I believe I have all the string and the periods in the right place). Here is the recycle configuration I have for a share, as my test: [contractors] comment = Contractors

Hi, I'm having Problem in getting the file_ext_map (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/file-ext-map/file_ext_map3/file_ext_map3.c?rev=1.2) vfs modules running with samba 3.0.10. I'm trying the cvs-version of the module which was originally coded for samba 3.0.0. It compiles fine against current samba code, but when I try to use it samba complains that it can't find the vfs

Any ideas why a vfs module loads successfully then can't be found? [2005/01/30 03:52:08, 5] lib/util_seaccess.c:se_access_check(309) se_access_check: access (2) granted. [2005/01/30 03:52:08, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_default(203) Initialising default vfs hooks [2005/01/30 03:52:08, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_custom(229) Initialising custom vfs hooks from [/usr/lib/samba/vfs/audit.so]

We installed the Samba 3.5.1 rpms for OpenSuSE 10.2 from ftp.sernet.de. The VFS modules seem to be broken. Is this an error in the packaging or do I need to be looking else where. A snippet from the log file follows: <extracted from log> [2010/03/12 19:58:59, 0, pid=28792, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/vfs.c:66(smb_register_vfs) Failed to register vfs module. The module

This problem continues under 3.0.4 on Solaris 8 - attempting to use the "vfs object" parameter in a share prevents access to the share and results in the following in the log files: [2004/05/10 16:04:57, 0] lib/module.c:do_smb_load_module(57) Error trying to resolve symbol 'init_module' in /usr/local/lib/vfs/audit.so: ld.so.1: /usr/local/sbin/smbd: fatal:

Dear All, I have upgrade my samba from 3.0.33 to 3.3.3, that proces are success but I have a problem for samba-vscan. Error : [2012/01/16 10:32:00.074547, 0] smbd/vfs.c:167(vfs_init_custom) error probing vfs module 'vscan-clamav': NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL [2012/01/16 10:32:00.074559, 0] smbd/vfs.c:309(smbd_vfs_init) smbd_vfs_init: vfs_init_custom failed for vscan-clamav [2012/01/16

Hello First I prepared mks_vir Daemon, necessary libraries and modules, everything work fine (I can scan files for vireses from the command line) after that I had install samba from source next I copies and modyfying necessary mks configuration file like /etc/samba/vscan-mks32.conf and add to /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf following lines in global section: vfs object =

add to each share writeable = yes or read-only = no This Helps! Rauno -----Original Message----- From: werner maes [mailto:werner.maes@cc.kuleuven.ac.be] Sent: 11. mai 2004. a. 16:19 To: samba@samba.org Subject: [Samba] BUG: Vfs audit module & samba 3.0.4 ==> share unaccessible Hello Maybe there's a bug in samba-3.0.4. The following configuration does NO longer work. It did

I just installed samba3+samba-vscan via ports on a FreeBSD 4.x system. Samba is running just fine and thanks to the help of webmin it was easily configured. Today I finally was able to get windows shares to be mounted on my FreeBSD server. So naturally I want to run av scans on it. I set it up to mount the entire C drive and to scan it using clamav which is also installed from ports. I recompiled

Hi Mariusz, I found this thread at SAMBA.ORG: snip... I can't remember for certain, but try using a relative path. > (e.g. vscan-mksd.so). I tried relative and non-relative path, with this same effect but you've right because in manual for samba-vscan we can read that in samba 3.0 we should use relative path. I had increase debug level of samba daemon and in my log I have found

On 25/12/2019 20:04, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 25/12/2019 16:46, Chris via samba wrote: >> Hello, > Merry Christmas Thanks Rowland! Hope you had a Merry Christmas too >> The shares of the file server are on the ZFS of the host and mapped >> via bind-mount. > > Ah, that could be a problem, ZFS uses NFSv4 ACLs >> > Try 'nfs4acl_xattr'

Hi, I just upgraded samba from 3.0.37 to 3.4.6 on a gentoo machine. After converting the passwd file (pdbedit -i smbpasswd -e tdbsam) I tried to login from a windows client but it didn''t work. After commenting the vfs-recycle entries in the shares definition I can successfully login. I cannot find any hint that the vfs objects in samba 3.4 has changed compared to 3.0.x. Can somebody

Hi, I just upgraded samba from 3.0.37 to 3.4.6 on a gentoo machine. After converting the passwd file (pdbedit -i smbpasswd -e tdbsam) I tried to login from a windows client but it didn''t work. After commenting the vfs-recycle entries in the shares definition I could successfully login. I cannot find any hint that the vfs objects in samba 3.4 has changed. Can somebody help? Thanks in

On 27/12/2019 12:59, Chris via samba wrote: > On 25/12/2019 20:04, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > >> On 25/12/2019 16:46, Chris via samba wrote: >>> Hello, >> Merry Christmas > Thanks Rowland! Hope you had a Merry Christmas too >>> The shares of the file server are on the ZFS of the host and mapped >>> via bind-mount. >> >> Ah, that

Hello Maybe there's a bug in samba-3.0.4. The following configuration does NO longer work. It did work fine in samba-3.0.2a. I did not test samba-3.0.3 The share is no longer accessible !!! [BKHI-CC3] path = /home/BKHI-CC3 valid users = @BKHI-CC3-R, @BKHI-CC3-W write list = @BKHI-CC3-W force group = +BKHI-CC3-W create mask = 0664

Hi, guys. I'm new to all of this and need some help with a problem I've been banging my head against for a while. (Tried troubleshooting, checking logs, and lots of Googling for a few weeks now, but just keep hitting dead ends.) SYMPTOM: Missing file `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/vfs/glusterfs.so`, as evidenced by error messages like these: [2018/11/18 07:56:42.551587, 0]

Hi, this is my first pos here, please be lenient. My problem shuld be a FAQ and, in fact I found a lot of references googling around, but nothing could really solve my problem, so here I am. I have a Samba server: Very basic wheezy amd64 installation on a small VIRTUAL server (Xen). Only fancy thing is direct access to a couple of RAID1 (mirror) arrays where data is stored. I normally access

Hai, No exactly Rowland. There is not missing anything. And he is correct, that file is missing in the official ubuntu and debian packages. I suggest report a bug at ubuntu, its missing in all there samba packages. https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?suite=cosmic&arch=any&searchon=contents&keywords=glusterfs.so You can pretty easy rebuild the ubuntu package if you need it.

Hi I've compiled and installed 2.2.5 on a Solaris 2.8 box. When attempting to browse the workgroup, a popup messages is displayed: Simple is not accessible. A device attached to the system is not functioning If I check the log file, the following error messages show up: ............ Jul 3 10:08:26 serv03 smbd[1544]: [ID 702911 daemon.error] [2002/07/03 10:08:26, 0]

I have compiled samba 3.0 on solaris 8 with default options. It's ok. I have problem with the parameters vfs objects. This is my smb.conf Global parameters [global] workgroup = SAMBATESTPDC netbios name = samba3sun preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes domain logons = yes local master = yes